I’m too lazy to make a pool, but who dies first?
Joe broke early but Mitch is coming on strong! I say Mitch. The Mr. Freeze thing is not looking good.
... Too Right you do! ... It's a morbid and shameful thingYou’re right! It’s terrible that I’m making light of two of the most powerful men in the free world. Shame they both wear diapers.
for YOU to do a ghoulish thread like this one!
That said - - put me down for a tenner on ol' Mitch
croaking first...
#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again
Term limits are something we can all agree on. Nobody should be allowed to be a "career politician".Nope, some things are meant to hard to change for a reason, the SCOTUS is something sancrosanct, even when the Conservative majority wasn't this big, I would have said the same thing, as, you would say today if the Libs were in the majority.
Term limits for SCOTUS too. Way too much power for someone to have for more than, say, 12-16 years. Originally Posted by tommy156
Nope, some things are meant to hard to change for a reason, the SCOTUS is something sancrosanct, even when the Conservative majority wasn't this big, I would have said the same thing, as, you would say today if the Libs were in the majority.So a Supreme Court Justice can stay till he/she is how old?
Your not going to have the power to remove the final arbiters of law in this country, because you don't like whose in power. Originally Posted by Devo
You’re right! It’s terrible that I’m making light of two of the most powerful men in the free world. Shame they both wear diapers.... Too right, mate! ... Damn right terrible that
I cannot except your bet however. I believe ole Mitch is a goner. Skin tone is ghost white with a far away stare! Do we have any takers??? Originally Posted by Charley3
Nope, some things are meant to hard to change for a reason, the SCOTUS is something sancrosanct, even when the Conservative majority wasn't this big, I would have said the same thing, as, you would say today if the Libs were in the majority.Term limits for all or for nobody. SCOTUS included. Why should someone who must adhere to term limits get to appoint someone who doesn’t?
Your not going to have the power to remove the final arbiters of law in this country, because you don't like whose in power. Originally Posted by Devo