Encounter: Really good SA chick in an uppity area nashville.

Date: from march until early june 2018
Name: sara
Phone: see ros
Email Address: -
URL / Website: i lost her SA profile
City: nashville
State: Tennessee
Address: Car play and my place Ill blend a few reviews into one ive seen her many time
Activities: BBBJ, HJ, MISH, CG, K9, SURFBOARD, BREAST WORSHIP, COCK WORSHIP, LKF, DFK, COF CIMNQBS.
Hair Length and Color: Same as pics but black not green when i saw her
Age: early 20s
Smoking Status: I Couldn't Tell
Ethnic Background: Black/African
Physical Description: Same as pics but much better in person she doesnt take good pics. Tiny little spinner with curves. Great tits, great ass, pretty face, perfecto. A valley girl accent that will make you cum in your pants. Great chick.
Recommendation: You bet I do

can you PM me what SA is.

can you PM me what SA is. Originally Posted by cablatino

"Seeking Arrangement", a sugar daddy dating site. I think it's changed its URL to "seeking.com" (the old URL of "seekingarrangement.com" redirects to "seeking.com"), but the website still calls itself "Seeking Arrangement" once you get there.

Back when I used to work that site it made a big deal about being a strict "sugar dating" site--that is, it specifically had new members acknowledge when they registered there that they had to be seeking a sugar relationship (ladies were looking to get an allowance, while men were looking for a woman to give an allowance to for a longerish term relationship); asking for or accepting a "pay per visit" (PPV) arrangement was specifically a bannable offense. That's probably still the rules there, but I haven't visited in quite a few months so things may have changed.

Even given that PPV was against the rules, a significant number of the women there were "flexible" enough about their arrangements that they'd entertain such an arrangement if offered, which pretty much made them the moral equivalent of escorts--and for that matter if you looked carefully enough you'd find a few ECCIE ladies on the site (usually they were there in the hopes of picking up a legit sugar daddy, not using SA as an additional marketing tool for their escort practice).

The advantage to working SA for PPV encounters, based on my both personal experience and reading men's posts in other forums here, is that since most of the ladies who were willing to accept PPV arrangements weren't in fact "in the hobby" formally, most of them had no idea of their "market value", so one could with a little skill negotiate an outrageously affordable encounter (a $300 overnight visit? I've seen it happen). The downside of it was running the risk that one would run into a lady who'd be insulted by the suggestion of a PPV arrangement ("What do you think I am? A PROSTITUTE?") and would report one to the admins there, which always (AFAICT) result in a swift ban from the site. The other downside was that (IMHO) SA was ridiculously expensive--you can't do more than browse the site without ponying up money, and the rates they'd charge you ($70/month for a one-month upgrade, though you could get the equivalent of a lower monthly rate if you subscribed for three months or a year at a time) weren't worth it, IMHO. The last disadvantage to the site IMO was that an absurd proportion of the women there suffered from ridiculous expectations, seriously thinking that most of the guys there would pay them an allowance of $5-10K per month for a purely platonic, social arrangement with no matress mauling whatsoever.

There, more than you really want to know, I'm sure. If you want to play with it yourself just point your browser to "http://www.seeking.com/" and try your luck. Happy hunting!

Cheers,

bcg

Good read

Good read

Good read

Originally Posted by LovesBBFS

yep good advice

While I get that some of the providers are now using some of these websites and the reviews in some cases are entertaining, I think we would be better served by the creation of an SA Encounters section for those that want to read them. Admins have created sections for Spas, strip clubs, studios - why not SA/SugarBaby reviews. Since many of us may never use the SA sites, these encounter reports kind of clutter the provider sections and aren't relevant and make search more tedious.

Thanks for the info

While I get that some of the providers are now using some of these websites and the reviews in some cases are entertaining, I think we would be better served by the creation of an SA Encounters section for those that want to read them. Admins have created sections for Spas, strip clubs, studios - why not SA/SugarBaby reviews. Since many of us may never use the SA sites, these encounter reports kind of clutter the provider sections and aren't relevant and make search more tedious. Originally Posted by archon

I fully agree. I will never use an SA site and pay their fees. I'm not comfortable with what they want from me, so I'll avoid them. So, a separate thread for them is a good idea. Get these reviews off here - most of them don't provide information that is useful to many of us.

JaG

Nice review

I fully agree. I will never use an SA site and pay their fees. I'm not comfortable with what they want from me, so I'll avoid them. So, a separate thread for them is a good idea. Get these reviews off here - most of them don't provide information that is useful to many of us.

JaG Originally Posted by JustaGuyinMS

youre missing out seriously, the quality is usually better on sa for cheaper rates than a pro. there are crackwhores on there too but when you find the good ones the are usually much better than any pro or crackwhore youd find.

we used to have the "other" section where sa reviews were posted but its gone so most areas have adapted to this. i think tennessee could use any kind of reviews, shit id read tranny/male escort reviews here this board is so dead.

Nice review
Originally Posted by trey32