OBAMA NEGOTIATING TO LET IRAN GET THE BOMB!

Obama the liar has now become Obama the traitor.


Phased US-Iran nuclear deal taking shape..........

http://news.yahoo.com/phased-us-iran...-politics.html

Obama the liar has now become Obama the traitor.


Phased US-Iran nuclear deal taking shape..........

http://news.yahoo.com/phased-us-iran...-politics.html Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Your ridiculous postings are becoming more and more frantic. When does the impeachment bus start loading? Fucking idiot....

Whirlaway riddle me this- which country right now has a more unstable regime Pakistan or Iran?

Read the fucking story, Whir-LIE-turd.

That's not really what the story says, is it? Doesn't really say they're trying to let Iran get the bomb, does it?

For a change, Whir-LIE-turd is spinning, "editorializing" and lying.

Ha...you are political neophyte. You think Obama would ink a deal that says "Iran can have the bomb by date here". That isn't how it is being scripted.

Read the article, a PHASED US Iran Nuke Deal !

One variation being discussed would place at least 10-year regime of strict controls on Iran's uranium enrichment program. If Iran complies, the restrictions would be gradually lifted over the last five years of such an agreement.

Obama is comfortably out of office and Iran is free to go nuclear.

That isn't why the world doesn't want Iran to have nukes..but is a liberal rationale for letting them go nuclear.

Do you think Iran should have nukes?

Whirlaway riddle me this- which country right now has a more unstable regime Pakistan or Iran? Originally Posted by wellendowed1911

That isn't why the world doesn't want Iran to have nukes..but is a liberal rationale for letting them go nuclear.

Do you think Iran should have nukes? Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Do you know that their top nuclear scientists studied at MIT. Do you further know that we even helped pay for part of their education through the atomic energy commission? That was when your old buddy Carter was president. If Iran plays by the rules we set out for them, who are we to deny another sovereign country? What would you do if someone told us we couldn't have the bomb? We are, after all, the country that dropped the first and only two in war.

?.....who are we to deny another sovereign country Originally Posted by UnderConstruction

Take your statements and transpose them back to about 1932 to 1937 in Nazi Germany.

Iran is theocracy, ruled by Islamic Clerics who would put you against the wll at the drop of a hat for no other reason than you don't believe in the same way they do.

The only difference between the Nazi's and the Clerics that rule Iran is about 60 years.

Take your statements and transpose them back to about 1932 to 1937 in Nazi Germany.

Iran is theocracy, ruled by Islamic Clerics who would put you against the wll at the drop of a hat for no other reason than you don't believe in the same way they do.

The only difference between the Nazi's and the Clerics that rule Iran is about 60 years. Originally Posted by Jackie S

Has Iran invaded its neighbors recently?

Ha...you are political neophyte. You think Obama would ink a deal that says "Iran can have the bomb by date here". That isn't how it is being scripted.

Read the article, a PHASED US Iran Nuke Deal !

One variation being discussed would place at least 10-year regime of strict controls on Iran's uranium enrichment program. If Iran complies, the restrictions would be gradually lifted over the last five years of such an agreement.

Obama is comfortably out of office and Iran is free to go nuclear. Originally Posted by Whirlaway

HA... you are a fucking loony! Why do you think anybody should agree with your perverse interpretation of any "script?"

Whirlaway riddle me this- which country right now has a more unstable regime Pakistan or Iran? Originally Posted by wellendowed1911

Exactly when did the US let, or aid, Pakistan in getting the bomb? Pakistan has nothing to do with Obama's treason. You're deflecting again.

And the government worker strikes again with stupidity; When did the liberal academic community start deciding who could study what? Iran has been providing training and IEDs to the insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan. Are you sure you've read a newspaper?

If Iran plays by the rules we set out for them, who are we to deny another sovereign country? Originally Posted by UnderConstruction

You overlook history. Iran is still a signatory to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. While it has never withdrawn from this treaty, for years it has failed to "play by the rules". Obama seems ready to overlook this history of violations and loosen up all of the non-proliferation treaty's strictures for Iran. If he does, then the whole idea of nuclear non-proliferation - as carefully codified in treaties and diplomacy over 50+ years - will be undermined.

Do you know that their top nuclear scientists studied at MIT. Do you further know that we even helped pay for part of their education through the atomic energy commission? That was when your old buddy Carter was president. Originally Posted by UnderConstruction

So what? As I just mentioned, Iran was a signatory to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty under the Shah. There was no reason for us not to share peaceful nuclear technology with them. You really are ignorant on the history and the issues at stake here.

.

The whining liberals want a "Jobs Program" for the terrorists.

They can rebuild Iran when the Israelis get done with them.

You overlook history. Iran is still a signatory to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. While it has never withdrawn from this treaty, for years it has failed to "play by the rules". Obama seems ready to overlook this history of violations and loosen up all of the non-proliferation treaty's strictures for Iran. If he does, then the whole idea of nuclear non-proliferation - as carefully codified in treaties and diplomacy over 50+ years - will be undermined.




So what? As I just mentioned, Iran was a signatory to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty under the Shah. There was no reason for us not to share peaceful nuclear technology with them. You really are ignorant on the history and the issues at stake here.

. Originally Posted by lustylad

So you admit that situations change over time? As long as the leader was someone of our choosing, our puppet, it was ok. Just like all the other regimes we've supported and given weapons to and then when it comes back to bite us, we feign indignation. How dare they? God forbid the people get tired of that set up. Oh no, history and diplomacy will be undermined. Whatever will we do? Untwist your panties, call up one of these bitches and get yourself a good pegging. It will make it all better.

Whirlaway riddle me this- which country right now has a more unstable regime Pakistan or Iran? Originally Posted by wellendowed1911

Great point there, wimpyendowed! It's a double standard! If the Pakis have nukes, then the Persians should. If the Persians have them, then the Saudis and the Egyptians and the Turks should too! Let's just let tear up the NPT and proliferate away! That will make the whole world a more stable place!

For what it's worth given your flawed understanding of history and reality, Pakistan never signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty but Iran did. So it's not a double standard for us to insist that Iran stop violating a treaty to which it remains nominally a signatory.