She seems to hold posters in contempt and hails lurkers. Is that you girls general opinion?
Originally Posted by FlectiNonFrangi
Here is the deal, most lurkers, those who read the boards but don't actually register and post a million reviews tend to be more discreet, and generally much more respectful.
Whereas you might get some guy who posts a million reviews and thinks he is "god" on an escort review board, who thinks he carries some kind of clout and persuasion with the other hobbyists, can treat a lady differently and use his "infamous board persona" to try and scare a lady into doing something she isn't comfortable with, or get freebies, or haggle, or blackmail or things of that nature. Wow, that was one long sentence! lol
I am not saying that all hobbyists do this but by design the system has been abused. You just don't have that problem with a lurker at all. If a lady chooses to do an activity with a lurker, something she normally wouldn't do at all with most, where she wants it to remain private and discreet, a lurker is not going to rush home to post a review that he got that activity. A lurker isn't going to say "I can write an awesome review of you if you do X,Y,Z for me, and make you lots of money if you give me a discount". Reviews are often times held over a ladies head.
So I think that is where Maggie McNeil is coming from.