I get that the devil is in the details. But, why would anybody oppose the idea that every human being is entitled to decent healthcare? I mean....should you not get healthcare if you get cancer....just because you don't have a job or health insurance?
Aren't we all entitled to medical care to help us live?
Why do all the GOP/Rightwingers/TeaPartiers oppose the idea that we should try to fashion a healthcare system that provides healthcare to people regardless of their financial circumstances?
Thoughts?
Originally Posted by timpage
I count the goalposts in three different places in one post...
...every human being is entitled to decent healthcare... you mean every American or every human being? What do you consider decent?
..entitled to medical care to help us live...I believe there are some "young invincibles" who have no "medical care" and are living quite fine, thank you. Yet, you would want them to pay for that medical care they aren't receiving.
...Why do all the GOP/Rightwingers/TeaPartiers oppose the idea that we should try to fashion a healthcare system that provides healthcare to people regardless of their financial circumstances?...We already have a healthcare system that does that. There was a lot of debate that anyone could go into a public American hospital and get life saving healthcare and not pay for it. WTF bring this up all the time. As we've said many times, try getting timely cancer treatment in Europe without insurance.
Let me ask you a question: if a law was passed that made the medical industry worse for delivering quality care for most Americans, would you own up to it?