Making Appointments

Hope this is a hoax. But if not, thanks to new laws (or the deletion of them) privacy is now completely DEAD unless you pay this website not to sell your text messages and face book messages and other digital data. https://financespace.co/12368743356

Evening Waleli,

The article and the service (TruthFinder) seem to be a hoax. When you click on the “publisher’s” title site (Finance Space), it just opens up various popups to other spam sites.
TruthFinder is a site/service that promotes it self as a service that can access various databases, but all it does is searches through public info. with the aim of having people pay $$ for “background checks” and also to spam them as well. Hope this clears any concerns.

Hope this is a hoax. But if not, thanks to new laws (or the deletion of them) privacy is now completely DEAD unless you pay this website not to sell your text messages and face book messages and other digital data. https://financespace.co/12368743356 Originally Posted by Waleli

I have four different ladies caution me about what we say in private messages here on ECCIE. They all claimed that management can read your private messages; so be cautious.

OK, I don't know for sure about this at all. Just repeating what the girls have told me. The solution was to just PM each other and request that the conversation continues to emails off site. We should all have a private email just for the hobby.

So don't get excited. If this is true or not, nothing is lost by going immediately off site.

Nothing is secure today. The only secure message are messages typed, printed and hand delivered to their recipient. If history teaches us anything both the Germans and the Japanese during WWII thought their electronic codes were secure, and the Allies broke the codes within two years of the wars outbreak.

Always assume your electronic communication can be read, either by hacker, website management, or a cleavor private investigator your SO has hired.

Nothing is secure. I agree. And discretion is precisely why I ask for no reviews. I am always shocked when men talk about how important discretion is on one hand while writing reviews with the other. Cognitive dissonance gives me a headache.

Clients are customers and demand discretion.
We do not advertise on the internet.
Reviews are for our knowledge, has nothing to do with the companion.

So I assume with your no review policy you know that you are not allowed to advertise on this site?
How are you going to get business with your signature line alone?

I am not too worried because I've probably only seen six or eight people from this website in the eight or ten years that I've known about it because very few men coming from this culture are discreet enough to get an appointment with me.

The one time I trusted the system and checked someone's reviews before seeing him I was arrested. Falsely, I might add. But I don't want to have to go through that kind of a hassle ever again. So now I only see people with very few or no reviews. No more legal problems either.

I don't want the business of people who demand discretion but won't answer an ad unless it is indiscreet, then refuse to respect the ladies enough to offer discretion in return, and put everybody at risk by exercising bragging rights. The review system is blatantly indiscrete.

If you want to kiss and tell, then you guys need to spend your time lobbying to get the law changed instead of breaking it.

Reviews aren’t bragging rights... they are payment for your ability to advertise on this site.
You can’t be discreet if you advertise your services on the internet.
You’ve announced to the entire world that you have something you are selling.

And you cannot have a no review policy and advertise or maintain a bio page on ECCIE. You can ask the gent not to review you but it is up to him whether he does or not. And if he does it will stay on the site.

What two consenting adults do in private once they've had a chance to get to know each other and become friends is nobody's business and YMMV. Reviews are completely irrelevant. A lady can do a whole lot more with someone who is flexible, in good shape, easts a healthy diet, and doesn't smell horrible from the inside out due to poor diet and never systemic cleansing, than she can with someone who can't even touch his toes or someone who has a wart on his dick that is bursting like a flower. What two consenting adults choose to do in private together, once they have met and become friends, would be perfectly legal, regardless of whether or not a fee is involved for time and companionship, if you guys were not insisting on having your bragging rights. Why can't men trust in their ability to be charming and inspire desire? Why can't they embrace the mystery? Is it because you are so wounded and shocked that your wives are not delivering their end of the marriage contract that you have formed a coercive force to drive women out of business if they won't submit to whatever you desire for money?

Because it’s a review site misguided companion.

The question is why men need to work each other up before seeing a lady. Why isn't it more exciting to embrace the mystery and see how much mileage YOU can get by inspiring a woman's desire instead of walking in with expectation some other guy has created for you. Men require women to embrace the mystery by refusing to schedule regular appointments and requiring them to be available at your beck and call. You can't be counted on to keep an appointment without putting up a deposit, which nobody will. They insist on "discretion" while writing reviews that could get them arrested. If the police ever want to use data mining to go after people and make money, they can. The evidence is there. The ladies are supposed to be "discrete" but you won't make appointments with them unless they put themselves at risk by blatantly advertising they are willing to break the law, promise you they will things that are illegal to sell and quote a price for the service. The notion of detailed reviews and discretion is oxymoronic. It doesn't even make any sense. I once had a guy say that he had to go out and get some strange every once in a while or he couldn't get it up for his wife at home, and she would think he was having an affair. He wanted me to put myself at risk and promise him I would have sex with a perfect stranger, sight unseen. I refused. Why are women willing to put themselves at risk like that? The answer to that question is why Fosta will eventually close this sight down. I say that based on what women are telling me about how they feel about the "necessity" of being reviewed. Personally, I haven't found it to be a necessity, and didn't realize women are not allowed to advertise unless they will permit reviews. That was news to me. But I rarely advertise because the quality of inquiries here is so indiscreet. So maybe nobody has ever reported me.

You sound unhappy.
I think you’re in the wrong career.
Here you are a commodity that is passed around for a price.
This whole site is designed for guys to do exactly that.
And the way you make decisions on who to give money to, is by reviews.
You should embrace that reality.
No one wants that ymmv see what happens jazz when you’re on the paying side.

I realized I was better suited to being a madam in the eighties and opened an escort service. I am long since retired. But I do still enjoy a good massage trade with a mature respectful gentleman every once in a while. The way this business has evolved is quite alarming and degrading for women, and I will go to my grave advocating on their behalf as that is my nature and purpose in life. And you guys have no idea how much resentment you are breeding by insisting on bragging rights so that you can walk in someone's door with a sense of entitlement that you may or may not even be able to live up to because of YMMV. You also have no idea how much more wonderful your sexual experiences would be if the women were not stuffing their resentments in order to accommodate you. There is a whole world of sexuality based on inspired desire that most men will never experience because they demand to be guaranteed an inferior accommodating fake experience.

I have four different ladies caution me about what we say in private messages here on ECCIE. They all claimed that management can read your private messages; so be cautious.

OK, I don't know for sure about this at all. Just repeating what the girls have told me. The solution was to just PM each other and request that the conversation continues to emails off site. We should all have a private email just for the hobby.

So don't get excited. If this is true or not, nothing is lost by going immediately off site. Originally Posted by sjohnlewis

Of course they can read your private messages, it depends on their administrator permission level, on all sites, there is always someone that can view everything that posted on a site, your IP's, pictures, everything, doesn't matter what site your using either.so if you have something to say you don't want to be seen on this or any other site, you better take it off line.