OK, so I was arrested for public intox (not really but for simplicity let's just say it's me). Anyway obviously I am worried about anything on my record (although only a misdemeanor here in OK). Also, "ticket" or whatever is $140. So here are my questions...oh by the way I will NOT have a lawyer. Court-appointed not available, pro-bono not available, and I can't afford one, so NO ATTORNEY:
1. How common is it for someone to get acquitted of public intox if they argue that they were not drunk, or rather that the prosecution can't prove that they were drunk? (no breathalyzer is required for intox) In other words, while the arrest may have been proper (some police arrest to for public intox for arguing with them), you can't really prosecute on the merits of the case?
2. How common is it or what would the chance be of me getting a reduced fine if I ask for mercy and mention financial hardship would be suffered?
3. How common is it or what are the chances that I could get deferred adjudication or withhold of adjudication if I call up the prosecutor or if I bring it up in court?
4. How can I possibly get it expunged later on? What steps do I need to take now in order to ensure that it is possible to get it expunged later on? (There is a previous DUI a few years back by the way)
5. Is a diversion program/deferred disposition possible?
6. Without a lawyer, I'm just toast aren't I?
http://ocdw.com/engine/emw.exe/*qsho...20Intoxication
^ This guy had WITNESSES and he STILL got convicted. Only on APPEAL did he get acquitted. I've read about lower courts doing crap like this before. They just rubber-stamp convictions with traffic and stuff like this. We just can't afford a lawyer, so any advice? Just pay the fine? A lot of questions, I know, but I would appreciate if anyone could answer one or two of the questions.