Donald declares his value of his wealth

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...st-wealth.html

nothing like flaunting his wealth blatantly! lol!

If he is going to save the western world like we want him to, then his net worth is priceless.

If he is going to save the western world like we want him to, then his net worth is priceless.

Originally Posted by Chief Manley

the best part is, he didn't have to file his assets until next year, but he filed it anyway.

I know there are going to be people who are going to be pissed off anyway.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...st-wealth.html

nothing like flaunting his wealth blatantly! lol! Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

the fact that Trump has not released his tax returns is only meaningful to the libtard left such as Assup and WTF, convinced that there is some smoking gun in them. well .. if there was, don't you think the IRS who has continuously audited Trump for decades would have found it by now?

plz show me one time .. ever .. that Trump has been found to have violated tax laws? just one ... bahhaaa

it's not there snowflakes .. got that? and it gets better .. or worse if you are a snowflake .. did not Obama direct the IRS to improperly deny and audit virtually any conservative and/or religious group thought to be against the liberal agenda? they did.

so isn't it likely that the traitorous Obama administration, with well over a year before elections, after Trump announced his candidacy for Lord Emperor .. er .. Der Fuhrer .. ah .. President! yes. that's it .. "President" bahhaaaa would have used its full unfettered corrupt might to unearth any .. any at all .. dirt on the Lord Emperor?

they most certainly did and found nada .. nothing! got that snowflakes??


have a nice day!




bahahaaaaaaaaa

Nobody has ever denied the fact that President Trump knows how to make a buck.

the fact that Trump has not released his tax returns is only meaningful to the libtard left such as Assup and WTF, convinced that there is some smoking gun in them. well .. if there was, don't you think the IRS who has continuously audited Trump for decades would have found it by now?

plz show me one time .. ever .. that Trump has been found to have violated tax laws? just one ... bahhaaa

it's not there snowflakes .. got that? and it gets better .. or worse if you are a snowflake .. did not Obama direct the IRS to improperly deny and audit virtually any conservative and/or religious group thought to be against the liberal agenda? they did.

so isn't it likely that the traitorous Obama administration, with well over a year before elections, after Trump announced his candidacy for Lord Emperor .. er .. Der Fuhrer .. ah .. President! yes. that's it .. "President" bahhaaaa would have used its full unfettered corrupt might to unearth any .. any at all .. dirt on the Lord Emperor?

they most certainly did and found nada .. nothing! got that snowflakes??

have a nice day!

bahahaaaaaaaaa Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

The questions concerning Trump's tax returns have never been about the legality of them. I doubt that with all the accountants on the Trump payroll that there was anything done that would be seriously incorrect.

However:

"There is also the fact that, unlike a tax return, these financial disclosure forms don't require Trump to detail how much he paid in taxes, the profits and losses from his various businesses, whether he has any holdings in foreign companies and whether (and how much) he has donated to charity. (Read this great Jeanne Sahadi piece for a comprehensive look at what tax returns tell you that financial disclosures don't.)


All of which makes the rhetoric coming from Trump and his top aides regarding his level of transparency about his finances misleading."

Source: http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/16/politi...ces/index.html

And let's remember that Trump PROMISED that he would release his tax returns after all audits were completed and now that turns out to be a LIE since he has since said he might release them AFTER he is out of office. Personally, I don't care. I will judge President Trump on his accomplishments, or lack thereof, while he is in office. So far, a solid "D".

The questions concerning Trump's tax returns have never been about the legality of them. I doubt that with all the accountants on the Trump payroll that there was anything done that would be seriously incorrect.

However:

"There is also the fact that, unlike a tax return, these financial disclosure forms don't require Trump to detail how much he paid in taxes, the profits and losses from his various businesses, whether he has any holdings in foreign companies and whether (and how much) he has donated to charity. (Read this great Jeanne Sahadi piece for a comprehensive look at what tax returns tell you that financial disclosures don't.)


All of which makes the rhetoric coming from Trump and his top aides regarding his level of transparency about his finances misleading."

Source: http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/16/politi...ces/index.html

And let's remember that Trump PROMISED that he would release his tax returns after all audits were completed and now that turns out to be a LIE since he has since said he might release them AFTER he is out of office. Personally, I don't care. I will judge President Trump on his accomplishments, or lack thereof, while he is in office. So far, a solid "D". Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Since it's not a legal mandate, "What difference does it make" that Trump may have lied about releasing his tax returns, speedy? The other candidate lied about why Ambassador Stevens died, speedy. I know which is the greater lie, speedy, even if you lib-retarded jackasses can't figure it out.

Where are the tax returns?

Why is that so secret to Twitler?

What is he hiding?

Can't be a "tune in tomorrow" thing. He's definitely dirty. Period.

The other candidate lied about why Ambassador Stevens died, speedy. I know which is the greater lie, speedy, even if you lib-retarded jackasses can't figure it out. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

What exactly does that have to do with a tax question?

What exactly does that have to do with a tax question? Originally Posted by JCM800

It's called deflection. It's all this idiot has ever done.

He is not obligated to release his tax returns. there is no law on that requirement.

Unlike listing his assets which is required by law and he didn't have to release those details this year.

big difference between the 2.

Where are the tax returns?

Why is that so secret to Twitler?

What is he hiding?

Can't be a "tune in tomorrow" thing. He's definitely dirty. Period. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

The idiocy of someone telling someone to prove a negative. I say that Assup literally eats shit, let him prove that he doesn't.

What exactly does that have to do with a tax question? Originally Posted by JCM800

Trump's tax returns had nothing to do with the OP; yet, speedy deflected the thread in that direction and pointedly called Trump a liar. The counter-point to his ignorant POV is that hildebeest was the bigger liar and that her ineptness to protect people under her care was of much greater concern than dim-retards constantly harping about Trump's tax returns -- which he is under no legal obligation to produce. Hildebeest, as Secretary of State, was legally obligated to provide adequate security for State Department personnel. She didn't.

What's your inane question have to do with the price of bacon?

It's called deflection. It's all this idiot has ever done. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Mebbe Trump should used the same deduction that Slick Willy used on HIS taxes. You know assup, the one where Slick Willy donated HIS used, skid-marked underware to " charity " for the tax deduction !!!

Since it's not a legal mandate, "What difference does it make" that Trump may have lied about releasing his tax returns, speedy? The other candidate lied about why Ambassador Stevens died, speedy. I know which is the greater lie, speedy, even if you lib-retarded jackasses can't figure it out. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Get off the Benghazi crap. When Ambassador Steven's sister states that Clinton was completely blameless I'll take her statement over your OPINION.

Clinton lost in no small part because many voters considered her to be a liar. Whether she is or is not is irrelevant when determining whether or not Trump is a liar. If Trump lied, then he lied. It is one of many statements he has made which are either lies or hypocritical.