Ol' Joe say...four more years of Trump will result in racist wildfires all over the country

The country will burn up with Trump racist climate change denial and will all be under water...WTF is this nut saying?? Watch: Biden Speech, a Painful Festival of Bugs and Confusion

I don’t know who thought of setting up Joe Biden giving a speech from in front of a field on Monday. But whoever did may be looking for a new job now, given how badly it came off.

The idea of being outside in and of itself probably wasn’t a bad idea. But if there’s one that’s true, you can’t control all the elements of an outdoor shoot.

Although they did put the media in the circles, even outside.

https://twitter.com/jellen805/status...d-confusion%2F

It ended up with people focused more on the bugs that were feasting on Biden than on whatever it was he was saying.

He was just explaining that “climate chain” was racist but dang, there were those darn bugs again!


Then Biden claimed that if we voted for the president rather than him, the world was going to burn/go under water because of climate change. The teleprompter must have advised him to put more energy into saying it, but doing so made it sound hilariously overdramatic.

https://twitter.com/CBSNews/status/1...d-confusion%2F

First, the areas with issues like California, are largely controlled by Democrats and the issues are not about ambiguous “climate change” as much as about actual arson, lack of water and the failure to clear out overgrowth. But when he talks about things “ablaze,” it’s cities that have been set ablaze, with rioting and looting from leftists, not climate change. In that, his campaign staff and his running mate, Kamala Harris, donated to get people arrested during the riots out on bail. So when Biden tries to blame Trump for the weather, he needs to check in the mirror over what his own people were actually doing to make things worse.

But apparently being out of the basement, battling the bugs and expending that energy was too much.

He seemed to have trouble getting through it all. What was happening here? Couldn’t he see the teleprompter?

Then he seemed to either forget what year it was and/or that he was not in fact running for re-election with Barack Obama in 2012. He claims he and Obama made solar energy “cost competitive” with regular energy (wrong, solar energy is not able to replace regular energy as we can see in California). But he promises to do more, “if we are re-elected.” Huh?

Finally, he moved quickly away again, not taking any real questions, although someone did ask the hard-hitting question if the “gloves were off” against Trump.

His folks must just be counting the days hoping they can pull him over the line. But the debate is coming, which promises to be an acid bath for him. Trump accepted the offer to have Joe Rogan moderate a four hour debate. Biden hasn’t accepted yet. It’s hard to imagine he could survive such a four hour debate, with real questions.

Saving American History Act of 2020

To prohibit Federal funds from being made available to teach the 1619 Project curriculum in elementary schools and secondary schools, and for other purposes.

Just sheer denial. This is what that nut is saying.

Trump wants to control what kids learn about slavery. That's so wrong in so many ways.


https://www.usatoday.com/story/opini...mn/5785438002/

It is not unreasonable to argue that we ought to be reasonable burdening our children with the torrent of blood and tears that darken the timeline of our country. How much is too much and at what age should children know how much of the ugliness? These are fair questions for parents and educators and the lawmakers who ultimately oversee the public education system.

It will get even worse.

climate chain is racist

build back bedder

Slavery of Africans by Africans

https://www.ironbarkresources.com/slaves/whiteslaves04.htm


Various societies in Africa and Asia enslaved prisoners of war. Slavery was also widely practiced amongst the Indians in the Northwest Coast and Eastern Woodlands of the United States, as well as on the islands in the Caribbean Sea. Lynn H. Nelson, from the Department of History of Kansas University, noted that African complicity was an integral part of the African slave trade.

• "It is difficult to determine when slavery became an important economic factor in African history. Certainly African enslaved each other from an early date; this is a common feature of most societies pursuing an agriculture based on manual labor. By about 900 A.D., however, a regular slave-trade had developed between the Niger River valley and the Muslims of Spain. With Negroes brought from West Africa and Slavs from Russia, the Spanish Muslim capital of Cordoba became one of the greatest slave-markets in the world. With the decline of Muslim Spain, this bulk of this trade shifted to East Africa. By this time, some peoples of Africa had come to depend upon the slave trade, and Zanzibar had become the great slave emporium. Wars between African tribes were not fought to kill, but to take prisoners who could be exchanged with Arab slave-traders for imported goods. It has been estimated that 25% of the slaves taken out of Africa ended up in Muslim lands. Even more important, this centuries-old trade had rooted the institution in the African economy and had established the general pattern of that trade."[25]

Zayde Antrim has also pointed out that African slavery was in existence well before the arrival of the Europeans.

• "Not only was slavery an established institution in West Africa before European traders arrived, but Africans were also involved in a trans-Saharan trade in slaves along these routes. African rulers and merchants were thus able to tap into preexisting methods and networks of enslavement to supply European demand for slaves. Enslavement was most often a byproduct of local warfare, kidnapping, or the manipulation of religious and judicial institutions. Military, political, and religious authority within West Africa determined who controlled access to the Atlantic slave trade. And some African elites, such as those in the Dahomey and Ashanti empires, took advantage of this control and used it to their profit by enslaving and selling other Africans to European traders."[26]

Hugh Thomas in his book on the history of Slavery, The Slave Trade, has detailed the African involvement in the production of victims for slavery. African monarchs often bought slaves from dealers, in order to sell them again to Europeans, to other Africans, or to Arabs especially. The rulers of Benin, the kings of Ashanti, Congo, and Dahomey; and the Vili rulers of Loango, sold great numbers of slaves over many generations. Jean Barbot, who was on a slave ship during the 17th century said "the slaves [whom the African monarchs] possess and sell are prisoners of war, or, if from among themselves, are condemned to slavery for some crime. But there are also those who have been kidnapped by their compatriots, these being mainly children...". The Muslims in Africa also had a heavy interest in the slave trade. Hugh Thomas noted that the Muslims traded their African slaves to many countries, selling them as far off as Java and India in the Middle Ages; and even to the Chinese.[27]

Richard Hellie in Slavery in Russia 1450-1725 says,

• "In Africa down to the 1930's, the various tribes continued to raid one another to capture slaves both for domestic use and to sell to outsiders. Moreover, in spite of the picture presented in Alex Haley's Roots, white slave traders almost never entered the interior in pursuit of prey but rather purchased their cargo from Africans at the ocean front; coastal Africans would not allow Europeans either into or through their own countries ...some scholars claimed that slavery in Africa was a response to the international slave trade, but it is now obvious that (Black) slavery was an old domestic institution that was adapted for supplying the international market when it developed." [28]

Hellie's view was echoed by Thomas Jackson in American Renaissance.

• "Among the Tuareg of the southern Sahara, during the 19th century 70-90% of the population were probably slaves. In the Sahel and the savannah, half the population might be slaves, while in the forests the figure could be as low as 10 to 20 percent. Professor Oliver in "The African Experience" argues that the European and American demand for slaves may not have increased the supply. White slave traders almost never ventured into the interior and were dependent on a varying supply over which they had no control. They followed the flow of captives rather than create it, shifting their bases up and down the coast according to where tribal wars were producing the most slaves. Africa clung to slavery long after it was abolished elsewhere. Between the world wars, Liberia, founded by freed American slaves, was censured by the League of Nations for practising slavery." [29]

An article from the Mel Fisher Maritime Heritage Society in Florida shows how widespread slavery was at that time.

• "At the dawn of the transatlantic trade, slavery was not new, nor were Africans the only people to be enslaved. Slavery is mentioned in the Bible, and most ancient societies including Egypt, China, India, Mexico, Peru and Greece made use of slave labor. Slaves were usually prisoners of war, conquered peoples, debtors or criminals. In Europe, the Roman Empire took slaves from every nation it overcame, including England, France, Spain and Germany. Slavery persisted in the Mediterranean Basin throughout the 17th century.
  
  The institution of slavery was present in Africa long before the arrival of Europeans on its shores - slaves had been taken from parts of the continent since the time of ancient Egypt. In the early 19th century, caravans of 18,000 to 20,000 black Africans were brought to Cairo for resale, and slaves of every color were sold in the great markets of North Africa, even as late as the first part of the 20th century.
  
  ...By 1650, most of the coastal states in Europe had possessions in the Americas. The Spaniards dominated Central America, the Dutch and Portuguese colonized in Brazil, and the English and the French had settlements primarily in the West Indies and North America. All of these countries eventually imported slaves from Africa to support their American colonies. European royalty, nobility and leading merchants were the principal supporters and benefactors of the slave trade."[30]

The Economist admitted that the British, French, Spanish and Portuguese were not the only people involved in the African slave trade.
"In Africa, slavery was accepted as the norm in most societies. Before Europeans arrived, and long after, millions of Africans were marched north across the desert by Arab traders. Most had been taken in war. The guns given in exchange helped wars to multiply and grow larger. Prisoners who might earlier have been absorbed into the victor's army or workforce, or killed, were now fed to European and American ships seeking human cargo, from Gambia round to Mozambique. Other Africans were sold as slaves because they owed a debt; some even by their own families. Some, like Equiano, were simply grabbed; though only in the early years by Europeans, because that upset relations with the African coastal kings, who wanted to keep control of the trade."

"Between the mid-15th century and the late 19th, 12m Africans, about a third of them women, made that voyage. Whites had found a new world, and needed blacks to exploit it. Seized - by other blacks, not whites - force-marched to the coast carrying ivory or copper, then inspected like animals, sold and crammed into ships, they made the 30-40-day voyage chained and forced to lie in their own ordure and vomit. Then taken out, inspected again and resold, they were branded and forced to dig in mines, clear land, plant and harvest sugar."

"Gradually in the 18th century an anti-slavery lobby built up in Europe, notably in Britain, the superpower of the seas. In 1772 Lord Mansfield, a judge, ruled that a runaway slave there could not be forced back by his master to the West Indies. The ruling was interpreted (questionably, but this was the effect) as confirming that there could be no slavery in Britain. In America, it created fears that Britain might try to abolish slavery in its colonies. The desire to maintain slavery was not the least motive for the American war of independence, in which some blacks fought on the British side. In 1807 Britain banned the slave trade, and began using its navy to stop it. But slavery itself did not end in the British Caribbean until 1838, in the United States (in practice) 1865, in Spanish-owned Cuba 1886, in Brazil 1888. The memory of slavery and its lasting social effects sour race relations in Europe and America to this day."[31]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

FTFY

Not.

The country will burn up with Trump racist climate change denial and will all be under water...WTF is this nut saying?? Watch: Biden Speech, a Painful Festival of Bugs and Confusion

I don’t know who thought of setting up Joe Biden giving a speech from in front of a field on Monday. But whoever did may be looking for a new job now, given how badly it came off.

The idea of being outside in and of itself probably wasn’t a bad idea. But if there’s one that’s true, you can’t control all the elements of an outdoor shoot.

Although they did put the media in the circles, even outside.

https://twitter.com/jellen805/status...d-confusion%2F

It ended up with people focused more on the bugs that were feasting on Biden than on whatever it was he was saying.

He was just explaining that “climate chain” was racist but dang, there were those darn bugs again!


Then Biden claimed that if we voted for the president rather than him, the world was going to burn/go under water because of climate change. The teleprompter must have advised him to put more energy into saying it, but doing so made it sound hilariously overdramatic.

https://twitter.com/CBSNews/status/1...d-confusion%2F

First, the areas with issues like California, are largely controlled by Democrats and the issues are not about ambiguous “climate change” as much as about actual arson, lack of water and the failure to clear out overgrowth. But when he talks about things “ablaze,” it’s cities that have been set ablaze, with rioting and looting from leftists, not climate change. In that, his campaign staff and his running mate, Kamala Harris, donated to get people arrested during the riots out on bail. So when Biden tries to blame Trump for the weather, he needs to check in the mirror over what his own people were actually doing to make things worse.

But apparently being out of the basement, battling the bugs and expending that energy was too much.

He seemed to have trouble getting through it all. What was happening here? Couldn’t he see the teleprompter?

Then he seemed to either forget what year it was and/or that he was not in fact running for re-election with Barack Obama in 2012. He claims he and Obama made solar energy “cost competitive” with regular energy (wrong, solar energy is not able to replace regular energy as we can see in California). But he promises to do more, “if we are re-elected.” Huh?

Finally, he moved quickly away again, not taking any real questions, although someone did ask the hard-hitting question if the “gloves were off” against Trump.

His folks must just be counting the days hoping they can pull him over the line. But the debate is coming, which promises to be an acid bath for him. Trump accepted the offer to have Joe Rogan moderate a four hour debate. Biden hasn’t accepted yet. It’s hard to imagine he could survive such a four hour debate, with real questions. Originally Posted by bb1961

Bugs don't land on Trump...his orange make up must be made from old powdered no pest strips

Not. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

meanwhile in present day Africa ...


Africa’s Forever Wars

https://foreignpolicy.com/2010/02/11...-forever-wars/


Why the continent's conflicts never end.

By Jeffrey Gettleman | February 11, 2010, 8:53 PM




There is a very simple reason why some of Africa’s bloodiest, most brutal wars never seem to end: They are not really wars. Not in the traditional sense, at least. The combatants don’t have much of an ideology; they don’t have clear goals. They couldn’t care less about taking over capitals or major cities — in fact, they prefer the deep bush, where it is far easier to commit crimes. Today’s rebels seem especially uninterested in winning converts, content instead to steal other people’s children, stick Kalashnikovs or axes in their hands, and make them do the killing. Look closely at some of the continent’s most intractable conflicts, from the rebel-laden creeks of the Niger Delta to the inferno in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and this is what you will find.



What we are seeing is the decline of the classic African liberation movement and the proliferation of something else — something wilder, messier, more violent, and harder to wrap our heads around. If you’d like to call this war, fine. But what is spreading across Africa like a viral pandemic is actually just opportunistic, heavily armed banditry. My job as the New York Times‘ East Africa bureau chief is to cover news and feature stories in 12 countries. But most of my time is spent immersed in these un-wars.


I’ve witnessed up close — often way too close — how combat has morphed from soldier vs. soldier (now a rarity in Africa) to soldier vs. civilian. Most of today’s African fighters are not rebels with a cause; they’re predators. That’s why we see stunning atrocities like eastern Congo’s rape epidemic, where armed groups in recent years have sexually assaulted hundreds of thousands of women, often so sadistically that the victims are left incontinent for life. What is the military or political objective of ramming an assault rifle inside a woman and pulling the trigger? Terror has become an end, not just a means.


This is the story across much of Africa, where nearly half of the continent’s 53 countries are home to an active conflict or a recently ended one. Quiet places such as Tanzania are the lonely exceptions; even user-friendly, tourist-filled Kenya blew up in 2008. Add together the casualties in just the dozen countries that I cover, and you have a death toll of tens of thousands of civilians each year. More than 5 million have died in Congo alone since 1998, the International Rescue Committee has estimated.


Of course, many of the last generation’s independence struggles were bloody, too. South Sudan’s decades-long rebellion is thought to have cost more than 2 million lives. But this is not about numbers. This is about methods and objectives, and the leaders driving them. Uganda’s top guerrilla of the 1980s, Yoweri Museveni, used to fire up his rebels by telling them they were on the ground floor of a national people’s army.Museveni became president in 1986, and he’s still in office (another problem, another story). But his words seem downright noble compared with the best-known rebel leader from his country today, Joseph Kony, who just gives orders to burn.


Even if you could coax these men out of their jungle lairs and get them to the negotiating table, there is very little to offer them. They don’t want ministries or tracts of land to govern. Their armies are often traumatized children, with experience and skills (if you can call them that) totally unsuited for civilian life. All they want is cash, guns, and a license to rampage. And they’ve already got all three. How do you negotiate with that?


The short answer is you don’t. The only way to stop today’s rebels for real is to capture or kill their leaders. Many are uniquely devious characters whose organizations would likely disappear as soon as they do. That’s what happened in Angola when the diamond-smuggling rebel leader Jonas Savimbi was shot, bringing a sudden end to one of the Cold War’s most intense conflicts. In Liberia, the moment that warlord-turned-president Charles Taylor was arrested in 2006 was the same moment that the curtain dropped on the gruesome circus of 10-year-old killers wearing Halloween masks. Countless dollars, hours, and lives have been wasted on fruitless rounds of talks that will never culminate in such clear-cut results. The same could be said of indictments of rebel leaders for crimes against humanity by the International Criminal Court. With the prospect of prosecution looming, those fighting are sure never to give up.


How did we get here? Maybe it’s pure nostalgia, but it seems that yesteryear’s African rebels had a bit more class. They were fighting against colonialism, tyranny, or apartheid. The winning insurgencies often came with a charming, intelligent leader wielding persuasive rhetoric. These were men like John Garang, who led the rebellion in southern Sudan with his Sudan People’s Liberation Army. He pulled off what few guerrilla leaders anywhere have done: winning his people their own country. Thanks in part to his tenacity, South Sudan will hold a referendum next year to secede from the North. Garang died in a 2005 helicopter crash, but people still talk about him like a god. Unfortunately, the region without him looks pretty godforsaken. I traveled to southern Sudan in November to report on how ethnic militias, formed in the new power vacuum, have taken to mowing down civilians by the thousands.

meanwhile in present day Africa ...


How did we get here? Maybe it’s pure nostalgia, but it seems that yesteryear’s African rebels had a bit more class. They were fighting against colonialism, tyranny, or apartheid. The winning insurgencies often came with a charming, intelligent leader wielding persuasive rhetoric. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Those same kind of "racist" wildfires are springing up here. It's tribal in our, the U.S., case. The FBI stops thugs from killing more fascists. Fascist authorities continue to kill citizens they're sworn to protect.

You think our society is any better because the streets are paved?

Those same kind of "racist" wildfires are springing up here. It's tribal in our, the U.S., case. The FBI stops thugs from killing more fascists. Fascist authorities continue to kill citizens they're sworn to protect.

You think our society is any better because the streets are paved?

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

i find it both appalling and disgusting you actually believe that.

is this a fascist or a radical anarchist? you know which it is .. yes you do.


2 California sheriff's deputies shot in apparent ambush on patrol car

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/2-calif...ounty-sheriff/





https://www.politico.com/news/2020/0...-ambush-413281


2 California deputies shot in apparent ambush; anger and protests follow

Protesters gathered outside the emergency room at the hospital where the injured deputies were being treated.


“To the protesters blocking the entrance & exit of the HOSPITAL EMERGENCY ROOM yelling “We hope they die” referring to 2 LA Sheriff’s ambushed today in #Compton: DO NOT BLOCK EMERGENCY ENTRIES & EXITS TO THE HOSPITAL,” the sheriff’s department tweeted. “People’s lives are at stake when ambulances can’t get through.”

is this your glorious people's revolution or a bunch of radical anarchists?

Saving American History Act of 2020




Just sheer denial. This is what that nut is saying.

Trump wants to control what kids learn about slavery. That's so wrong in so many ways.


https://www.usatoday.com/story/opini...mn/5785438002/








Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Slavery was bad.

What else needs to be taught?

Joe thinks by "believing the science" the mean global temperature of the Earth will magically begin to decrease and a century of environmental damage will be reversed overnight.

Would be cool if you could be for the environment but against crazy SJWs at the same time.

Wacky has done more for the black people’s than anyone with the possible exception of Lincoln and Trump.

LOLLING

Wacky has done more for the black people’s than anyone with the possible exception of Lincoln and Trump.

LOLLING Originally Posted by HoeHummer

if yous say so, Yssup Rider

Bugs don't land on Trump...his orange make up must be made from old powdered no pest strips


Originally Posted by matchingmole

This is the best I've ever seen H I S hair, though. That actually looks pretty normal.