$80,000,000 is a lot of money, even for a billionaire. He'd have come out better by just admitting he did it. Originally Posted by 1blackman1Do you believe there's a greater than 50% probability he pays the $83 million?
$80,000,000 is a lot of money, even for a billionaire. He'd have come out better by just admitting he did it. Originally Posted by 1blackman1
Judge and jury both said he did.
(Oh, and Trump Didn't do it, mate. ... He's Innocent)
#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again
Judge and jury both said he did.
Fact of the business is that he's a slanderer and a sexual assaulter. He has committed public defecation, errr, defamation and continues to shite on the laws of this country.
Why don't we re-litigate the entire case right here on ECCIE, like the missing GA ballots? Or the moon landing, for that matter!
LOLLING! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Only Trump is infallible, right?
baahbaaahblacksheeeeep Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
83 but close enough.Nobody knows what if anything happened at the Department Store except Carroll and Trump. But Trump and his attorneys weren’t allowed to question whether Carroll was lying at the trial. The jury had to accept with certainty that Trump raped her. Is that Orwellian or what? If I weren’t posting from a cell phone I’d link to LustyLad’s Kangaroo Court post.
what if Trump didn't assault that woman Carroll? Trump haters will believe anything negative about Trump but that doesn't mean is true does it?
you do know that Carroll has accused over 20 men of sexual assault? yet it's only Trump she sued in court.
it's also worth noting she had decades to make this claim and didn't until after Trump ran for president and that Reid Hoffman a billionaire major Dem supporter bankrolled her legal expenses?
nothing political here yeah?
Carroll also couldn't remember when exactly this supposedly happened in her court testimony changing the date several times.
most rape victims typically don't forget the time and date when it happened.
and if im not mistaken Carroll could only bring this civil charge long after the fact because New York passed their "metoo" law allowing a window for it.
and there is another possibility that she and Trump did have consensual sex and she just got vindictive that Trump wouldn't see her again.
if that's the case then not only is it clearly a sham political stunt it's also making false claims of a crime by Carroll
bahahahhaa Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
This trial wasn't about the sexual assault.For the sake of argument say he didn’t sexually assault her. If that’s the case, should he have to pay damages for defamation?
This judgment was for defamation. Trump is the poster child for defamation. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider