Encounter: Sienna Synn

User ID: N/A
Date: 03/21/24
Name: Sienna Synn
Phone: 573-291-7261
Email Address: N/A
URL / Website: N/A
City: Columbia
State: Missouri
Address: N/A
Activities: BBBJ, GFE, DATY, No kissing or CIM.
Hair Length and Color: Past the shoulder red hair
Age: 25
Smoking Status: I Couldn't Tell
Ethnic Background: White/Caucasian
Physical Description: A stunning redhead about 5'9" with an incredible, fit body. Her pictures on skipthegames don't do her justice. Many, but tasteful tattoos. Beautifully proportioned breasts. She is an above average provider.
Recommendation: Yes

John Carter of Mars per chance? Was Sienna as beautiful as the Thuvian princess? But seriously since no CIM was allowed was it still a good finish? Curious if she is worth the price of admission?

So what is your definition of GFE? For me, if kissing isn't allowed then it isn't GFE for me. But to each his own.

Here’s a Link
https://sumosear.ch/phone/573-291-7261
Click on the Picture and it shows the Ad .

So what is your definition of GFE? For me, if kissing isn't allowed then it isn't GFE for me. But to each his own. Originally Posted by mizurymule

This was my 1st thought too.

No kissing (lfk/dfk), not gfe.

Hello fellow mongers
Some hateful provider has either gotten a couple of her lapdogs to start a vicious and unfounded rumor, or she has a fake account or two and done it herself, about this lovely lady Miss Sienna Synn. Was hoping anyone who has seen her lately would take the time to give her an honest review. Hopefully this will stop this BS in it's tracks.
I plan to see her myself when I get back up to CoMo area next week.
Reason Im asking is so she doesn't quit the business! Her feelings are hurt and I think some support would help her out a lot!

Thank you!

Oh and the lies are being posted on the other forum we all use. USA.

Joe cool, what is your review of this one?

#12 - In our review forums, be mindful of the 'maturity' of threads you are posting to, ie. the date of the last item posted. We ask that you refrain from posting to a review in which the last post was made 30 or more days ago. Some exceptions may apply if you are providing relevant, valuable or updated information about the provider, but as a general rule of thumb, this can best be accomplished by writing a new review altogether and avoiding the bumping of old ones.

Thread Closed