Trump socialism

Texxan52's Avatar
Trumps plan for a 100% tariff on foreign made cars is pure socialism. A Capitalist would say if US Automakers can't compete so be it. What do you high school graduate economist think?
adav8s28's Avatar
Trumps plan for a 100% tariff on foreign made cars is pure socialism. A Capitalist would say if US Automakers can't compete so be it. What do you high school graduate economist think? Originally Posted by Texxan52
It's not pure capitalism for sure. However, China puts tariffs on products made in the USA. If one side does it, the other side should be able to do it as well.
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Trumps plan for a 100% tariff on foreign made cars is pure socialism. A Capitalist would say if US Automakers can't compete so be it. What do you high school graduate economist think? Originally Posted by Texxan52

one of the main reasons US automaker aren't as competitive is the UAW. they add 5-7 thousand to the cost of a US car.

China doesn't have unions. well the Union of the Communist party that is but their labor is far cheaper.


It's not pure capitalism for sure. However, China puts tariffs on products made in the USA. If one side does it, the other side should be able to do it as well. Originally Posted by adav8s28

Correct. it's China that not only puts tariffs on US products but also limits production in such areas as cars to keep their cars as the most available product. if China let Ford and Chevy sell unlimited numbers the demand would hurt their car makers. China won't allow that.

it's not a level playing field with China, not even close and they also require US tech and manufacturing to give them their trade secrets.

they tariff our products, limit imports from the US, restrict production and make us share our manufacturing tech.

what would an actual economist call that?

unfair trade practices


and so is Trump.
eyecu2's Avatar
one of the main reasons US automaker aren't as competitive is the UAW. they add 5-7 thousand to the cost of a US car.

China doesn't have unions. well the Union of the Communist party that is but their labor is far cheaper.





Correct. it's China that not only puts tariffs on US products but also limits production in such areas as cars to keep their cars as the most available product. if China let Ford and Chevy sell unlimited numbers the demand would hurt their car makers. China won't allow that.

it's not a level playing field with China, not even close and they also require US tech and manufacturing to give them their trade secrets.

they tariff our products, limit imports from the US, restrict production and make us share our manufacturing tech.

what would an actual economist call that?

unfair trade practices


and so is Trump. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
Well, many parts used in the US assembly and subassembly are using Chinese parts most metal castings happen over there, things like engine blocks, rotors and other relays and things like light housings and plastics. This separatism and trade tarrifs are certainly in order when there are imbalances in trade.

But not for political statements purely. Saber rattling for the rally cries is a ruse at best.

Imagine Donald putting a hundred percent import tax on foreign-made autos, or parts. It would do nothing but drive up the cost of every car sold in America by $5,000 to $10,000 and delay cars by a year or more.

Some thoughts on the import of Chinese parts:
There are hundreds of Chinese companies with office in the US selling components used by car manufacturers, and the trade is worth tens of billions.

See:

https://www.usitc.gov/publications/3...ompliant_0.pdf
If you are wondering what impact a Chinese trade ban would have on the US auto industry, terrible, but only for a short period until alternative suppliers can be found. Unlike the situation in Russia, the US auto industry doesn’t depend on overseas suppliers for electronics and other high tech components. The sorts of things bought from the Chinese could be built anywhere, including the US, albeit at higher cost.
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Well, many parts used in the US assembly and subassembly are using Chinese parts most metal castings happen over there, things like engine blocks, rotors and other relays and things like light housings and plastics. This separatism and trade tarrifs are certainly in order when there are imbalances in trade.

But not for political statements purely. Saber rattling for the rally cries is a ruse at best.

Imagine Donald putting a hundred percent import tax on foreign-made autos, or parts. It would do nothing but drive up the cost of every car sold in America by $5,000 to $10,000 and delay cars by a year or more.

Some thoughts on the import of Chinese parts:
There are hundreds of Chinese companies with office in the US selling components used by car manufacturers, and the trade is worth tens of billions.

See:

https://www.usitc.gov/publications/3...ompliant_0.pdf
If you are wondering what impact a Chinese trade ban would have on the US auto industry, terrible, but only for a short period until alternative suppliers can be found. Unlike the situation in Russia, the US auto industry doesn’t depend on overseas suppliers for electronics and other high tech components. The sorts of things bought from the Chinese could be built anywhere, including the US, albeit at higher cost. Originally Posted by eyecu2

exactly what Trump would prefer .. more US based manufacturing in all areas not just the auto industry. this problem has existed for decades and partly the fault of US success. we are one of the highest average income per capita in the world. we are 4th and the top three are far smaller nations. of the big nations we are number 1 by a mile. the next big nation is Australia at 12th.


this means we've always had the size for resources and population for a large work force.

however, our success means you can't pay a US factory worker 10 bucks an hour. good manufacturing jobs in the US have to pay more simply because we became the largest economy in the world and have the highest standard of living.

you can pay 10 bucks an hour in Mexico for example. which is in large part why US companies moved plants off shore. the excessively high US corporate tax rate had a lot to do with that also. now it's more competitive which helps keep jobs in the US and to create new jobs.


Trump wants more US manufacturing more than a tariff war with China but if that's what it takes to level the playing field he'll do it. would he go as high as 100%? probably not, that's more campaign rhetoric to make the point but China .. and other nations ... do use tariffs to get unfair advantage on the US. Trump is not wrong on that.

you are right, in the long term the US economy can make up the difference far easier than China who is so dependent on exports to the US with no other big player to easily take our place it could actually crash China's economy.


Trump knows this and so does Xi. for this alone Xi will bargain. he has no choice not to.
  • Tiny
  • Today, 04:57 PM
Trumps plan for a 100% tariff on foreign made cars is pure socialism. A Capitalist would say if US Automakers can't compete so be it. What do you high school graduate economist think? Originally Posted by Texxan52
Please give credit where credit is due. This was Joe Biden's idea:

https://www.utilitydive.com/news/joe...-final/727014/

Just like Kamala took a couple of the Trump/Vance team's ideas, like the child tax credit, and one upped them, so too is Trump trying to outdo the Democrats.

What's ironic about Biden's 100% tariff on Chinese electric vehicles and 50% tax on solar cells is that he's also pumping $1.2 trillion into green pork with the Inflation Reduction Act. That's according to Goldman Sachs. So while he's breaking the budget with green pork, he's also going to drive up the cost of low end EV's maybe by 100% and solar cells by 50%! Incredible! That's no way to run economic and climate policy!

And yeah, Trump's taking a bad idea and making it worse by proposing to expand Biden's tariff to all foreign cars.

I wouldn't call this socialism. Stupidity is a better description.