Review Recommendations

This is a review site, and it seems many people ONLY write "yes" reviews. Chances are they have had a "no" experience at least once. Why is there such hesitation in writing "No's"? We all know that the "no reviews" are the most helpful. Keep in mind I don't buy the whole "She must have had an off day so I am not going to ruin her perfect record with a bad review". If her record is so perfect, she will surely survive one "NO". Plus that "no" could be what it takes to keep a lady who may be slipping to get back to her "A" game. What does everyone think?

Ladies, would you see a gentleman again who you know wrote a "no" review of you? Or "no" to another lady?

Gents, could not writing "no reviews" be because you are afraid ladies will see you wrote a bad review and subsequently "blacklist" you because they don't want to take the chance of you writing another "no"? I know there is not a single lady who will admit to such a practice, but it does happen.

"If you don't have something nice to say...."

Seriously though, I think everyone has had bad experiences, both provider and hobbyist. I suppose if the encounter were truly horrible, I might post a negative review. I've had encounters where the provider and I didn't seem to click, for whatever reason, and I just didn't write a review at all. Cest la vie.

I've been fortunate in that I've had mostly great experiences with the ladies I've seen. However, I don't think just wrtiting a negative review would spark a "blacklist" reaction from the provider. Although, if such a thing happened, I would hope the other providers who have seen the hobbyist would be able to decipher the "blacklist" was some type of retaliation.

No fear in writing a "no" review. I maintain good relations with the handful of providers I frequent so why would they care if I gave someone else a "no." The provider I gave the "no", I wouldn't want to see again anyway. Don't really care about some "blacklist", I'd just live on my repeat providers. They'd still see me because I don't think there's any code between providers- they just worry about their safety and as long as you handle yourself as a gentlemen and carry cash...
Couple of theories why so many "yes" reviews: it's the structure and success of this board mostly. Reviews here take work and are really only written by a handful of veteran guys. Everyone else is a lurker. Veterans can sniff out those bad providers and we all do our research. The info provided here yields more successful experiences. Frankly, I think the rookies that write reviews are just happy with anything since sex is sort of like pizza...
Since I have been here, never had a "no'- just lucky- no bad experiences. A fair "no" is the most valuable of all reviews.

Am I the only one who remembers the Hot Cindy Lou incident? It was back on the old board. A newbie had the temerity to call out this woman for the fraud that she was and he was lambasted by white knights attacking him for telling the truth. They drove the poor bastard out of the hobby or at least back to being a lurker. I still have the PMs she sent me calling me an asshole and casting aspersions on my hygiene. She did mention a providers' blacklist that she was putting me on. Well, she didn’t exactly cover herself with glory when she made her exit from the biz, did she ladies? I guess it’s only OK to write a negative review as long as the woman isn’t in with the powers that be. And what is the point of the endless positive reviews of ladies who have been reviewed more times than I can count. Unless they slip, what’s the point? To get premium access? End of vent.

eeeeehhhh..never mind..what he said..this shit ain't gonna change..

Sometimes not too eager to relive a shitty experience ...

Hotcindylou was 16 years older than she claimed good lord ...

And what is the point of the endless positive reviews of ladies who have been reviewed more times than I can count. Unless they slip, what’s the point? To get premium access? Originally Posted by jokacz

Yes. Unfortunately, that's one of the drawbacks of the system as it's set up here.

Hotcindylou was 16 years older than she claimed good lord ... Originally Posted by whosdair

That was after she raised her e.com age from 29 to 39. Try 26 years older.

Frankly, I think the rookies that write reviews are just happy with anything since sex is sort of like pizza... Originally Posted by mwebber

I was thinking that of a review this weekend. Of a provider I see a lot. dam I didn't know I had it so good.

It would take a lot for me to give a "no". Yet then I have never met perfect, very very close, but not perfect. But then I am far from perfect myself. If Hunter would post more, or the others I see where not UTR and where on here. I would be so busted. But I would still see them.

With that said, the one I review 2 times in "other". First "yes", then "yes but I need to cut and run". Now I would have to say "NO". Wish it was not so.

It takes a set of brass balls to do a "no". Hell I did a so-so review of a time that did not go well, still gave her a "yes". That still was right in my mind. And got blasted by White, Grey, and Black Knights in rusted suits of armor. And I'm still here.

Edit: and my "not my cup of tea" reviews are just that. Not for me. But can see why other would love to.

Am I the only one who remembers the Hot Cindy Lou incident? It was back on the old board. A newbie had the temerity to call out this woman for the fraud that she was and he was lambasted by white knights attacking him for telling the truth. They drove the poor bastard out of the hobby or at least back to being a lurker. I still have the PMs she sent me calling me an asshole and casting aspersions on my hygiene. She did mention a providers' blacklist that she was putting me on. Well, she didn’t exactly cover herself with glory when she made her exit from the biz, did she ladies? I guess it’s only OK to write a negative review as long as the woman isn’t in with the powers that be. And what is the point of the endless positive reviews of ladies who have been reviewed more times than I can count. Unless they slip, what’s the point? To get premium access? End of vent. Originally Posted by jokacz

That's what happens when you write things when certain people have a "protected" status/aura on them when people in power are on their side. Doesn't matter what site the old or the new it happens and will continue to happen. There will always be untouchable favorites that will get you in trouble if you go against the grain. There are certain provider names that have an odd tendacy to get threads a "lock down" if certain truths/opinions are expressed. Case in point the above mentioned provider and a similar one that got into legal issues...but oh god forbid we bring that up...cause thats a No No.

ALOT of VERY GOOD points being made in this thread. Thanks guys. After all is said and done, it will be funny to go back and look at this thread and see who didn't post. Their silence will speak volumes.

Hopefully this thread won't get locked LOL

I will say this it's my money if I feel that I didn't have a good time I will say so.

From the way it looks like things run a Gent can say yes and then trash talk a lady behind her back and write total lies about her in the part of a review that she can't see.
I have seen Gents that have said no but I have asked them why, both Gents said it was because the Lady was drunk or on some sort of drug.

ALOT of VERY GOOD points being made in this thread. Thanks guys. After all is said and done, it will be funny to go back and look at this thread and see who didn't post. Their silence will speak volumes.

Hopefully this thread won't get locked LOL Originally Posted by GP

mmmmm That can go both ways.

From the way it looks like things run a Gent can say yes and then trash talk a lady behind her back and write total lies about her in the part of a review that she can't see.
I have seen Gents that have said no but I have asked them why, both Gents said it was because the Lady was drunk or on some sort of drug. Originally Posted by Lexxxy

if you would like I will post why I'm saying "no" now on one I review a "yes" before. In the open In this thread. And its not for the reasons you posted. mmmm nap time will check latter