I dont remember Amy using these top 3 pics in the past. Also, Im SURE the second pic is another lady currently posting ads on BP. This ad just seems fishy to me. Anyone else?
http://kc.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/3171283
- paragod
- 01-20-2010, 05:13 PM
- paragod
- 01-20-2010, 05:25 PM
I found the second pic from Amy's ad in the ad below. Different name, different phone number.
BE CAUTIOUS
http://kc.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/3157230
BE CAUTIOUS
http://kc.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/3157230
- Guest121212
- 01-20-2010, 06:17 PM
The return of the "lonely, bored housewife" ads . . . makes one wonder if "soccer mom" is next?
Kisses,
- Jackie
Kisses,
- Jackie
- paragod
- 01-20-2010, 06:55 PM
- Guest121212
- 01-20-2010, 09:31 PM
I didn't say anything, don't quote me on it and don't ask me any questions I can't answer . . . 
Kisses,
- Jackie
Kisses,
- Jackie
- MsElena
- 01-20-2010, 10:27 PM
Paragod,
The 1st and 3rd pictures have been on CL/BP in KC and Omaha for well over a year. Legit? Don't know, but I do remember that there have been a few discussions on ASPD about her.
The 1st and 3rd pictures have been on CL/BP in KC and Omaha for well over a year. Legit? Don't know, but I do remember that there have been a few discussions on ASPD about her.
- Guest052813-01
- 01-21-2010, 02:44 AM
I saw Amy about 2 years ago when she first came to KC, so Amy is legit. The tip and bottom pics are ones Amy has used in the past. The second pic was used in a lonely, bored housewife ad on BP recently; not sure about the third pic. And Amy was using an Oklahoma-based phone (area code 405).
- lookn2u4fun69
- 01-21-2010, 05:38 AM
She has used the top and bottom pics for a long time. i have never seen her so i don't know if they are accurate or not.
Any ad that says "lonely bored housewife " in my opinion is LE and i would avoid.
Any ad that says "lonely bored housewife " in my opinion is LE and i would avoid.
- Guest052813-01
- 01-21-2010, 05:45 AM
She has used the top and bottom pics for a long time. i have never seen her so i don't know if they are accurate or not.The bottom pic (showing her face) is accurate - that is her (at least, it was her a couple years ago). The top pic, not sure because she was blonde when I saw her.
Any ad that says "lonely bored housewife " in my opinion is LE and i would avoid. Originally Posted by lookn2u4fun69
- amberxxx
- 01-24-2010, 08:05 PM
I know amy is not the bored house wife nor is she police,I know she's legit and have talked with her on numerious occassions. Maybe that will clear the air on the bored house wife.
- Jackie Dallas
- 01-24-2010, 08:11 PM
amy is a true southern belle!! AND not le at all
- SFviii
- 01-24-2010, 09:23 PM
Amy may be legit but her ad info & pics are inaccurate. 
[ame="http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=12560"]Review: Amy - Southern Beauty? - ECCIE - Your source for escort reviews[/ame]
SF8
[ame="http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=12560"]Review: Amy - Southern Beauty? - ECCIE - Your source for escort reviews[/ame]
SF8
- Guest121212
- 01-25-2010, 12:50 AM
Allow me to clear up a misunderstanding that may be partially my fault -
My posting was not made to infer that the ad (Amy's) was anything other than different from that which she had posted in the past and appeared that her photos had been hijacked from legit ads and placed to form what appeared to be an advertisement with a common title that LE has used in the KC area in the past . . . I have been informed (by someone claiming to be her via a profanity laced email) that she apparently books with two numbers and there was / is the outstanding question that someone else had used her images in another advertisement altogether (which I inferred from her disjointed and incomplete correspondence, again, laced with expletives) . . . I apologize if my post led anyone to the false assumption that I was "calling out" the advertisement directly as LE (I honestly didn't desire to make that inference but I can certainly see how that association could have been made in retrospect). As for the confusion regarding her different phone numbers, the possibility that another "provider" may be using her images and the poor review . . . well, I'll leave it to someone with better detective skills than myself to figure it all out.
I will say, as has been echoed here in this thread, that ANY ad that states "lonely, bored housewife" in the KC market will be met with overwhelming suspicion based on previously confirmed LE postings.
My postulate that the "soccer mom" ads maybe next was based solely on conjecture based on a detailed accounting of ad cycles and patterns that had been noticed over the course of the last several weeks in the KC market and other proprietary information.
I am sure Amy herself would be welcomed and I'd encourage her to sign-up for an account here and pursue verified provider status (if she hasn't already) so that she herself may directly contribute to clearing up any discrepancy as may have been addressed previously in this thread.
If my posting negatively impacted the young lady in any manner, allow me to apologize directly. However, I will state for the record that in instances of a provider using two numbers to book simultaneously in the same market WILL send up a flurry of red flags . . . as will mixing "inaccurate" (or substantively different) images throughout an advertisement.
Kisses,
- Jackie
My posting was not made to infer that the ad (Amy's) was anything other than different from that which she had posted in the past and appeared that her photos had been hijacked from legit ads and placed to form what appeared to be an advertisement with a common title that LE has used in the KC area in the past . . . I have been informed (by someone claiming to be her via a profanity laced email) that she apparently books with two numbers and there was / is the outstanding question that someone else had used her images in another advertisement altogether (which I inferred from her disjointed and incomplete correspondence, again, laced with expletives) . . . I apologize if my post led anyone to the false assumption that I was "calling out" the advertisement directly as LE (I honestly didn't desire to make that inference but I can certainly see how that association could have been made in retrospect). As for the confusion regarding her different phone numbers, the possibility that another "provider" may be using her images and the poor review . . . well, I'll leave it to someone with better detective skills than myself to figure it all out.
I will say, as has been echoed here in this thread, that ANY ad that states "lonely, bored housewife" in the KC market will be met with overwhelming suspicion based on previously confirmed LE postings.
My postulate that the "soccer mom" ads maybe next was based solely on conjecture based on a detailed accounting of ad cycles and patterns that had been noticed over the course of the last several weeks in the KC market and other proprietary information.
I am sure Amy herself would be welcomed and I'd encourage her to sign-up for an account here and pursue verified provider status (if she hasn't already) so that she herself may directly contribute to clearing up any discrepancy as may have been addressed previously in this thread.
If my posting negatively impacted the young lady in any manner, allow me to apologize directly. However, I will state for the record that in instances of a provider using two numbers to book simultaneously in the same market WILL send up a flurry of red flags . . . as will mixing "inaccurate" (or substantively different) images throughout an advertisement.
Kisses,
- Jackie
- paragod
- 01-25-2010, 06:20 PM
Well said Jackie.
- sexiamy
- 01-25-2010, 06:32 PM
Hi guys its amy I am legit I used to be a blonde now a brunette I need new pics due to the fact I have lost a lot of weight and looking good I might say sorry if some hobbiest didn't like me in the past but I do have a website with a lot of great reviews so thank you did not want people to think I was le sorry jackie for having a potty mouth