"A War That Would Last Days, Not Weeks "

Yep...that is what Obama promised more than four months ago...another phony promise from a failed leader....


http://abcnews.go.com/International/...ry?id=13164938


But the non-war war continues on...and so does our involvement....

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...-conflict.html

Yep...that is what Obama promised more than four months ago...another phony promise from a failed leader....


http://abcnews.go.com/International/...ry?id=13164938


But the non-war war continues on...and so does our involvement....

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...-conflict.html Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Pardon me, I had forgotten about America's very limited role in Libya. I thought you were referring to the comments made by the Bush Administration when the decision was made to invade Iraq!

"We will, in fact, be greeted as liberators. . . . I think it will go relatively quickly... (in) weeks rather than months." Vice President Cheney [3/16/03]

Yep...that is what Obama promised more than four months ago...another phony promise from a failed leader....


http://abcnews.go.com/International/...ry?id=13164938


But the non-war war continues on...and so does our involvement....

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...-conflict.html Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Here is the President's statement from the top link.

"President Obama told a bipartisan group of members of Congress today that he expects the U.S. would be actively involved in any military action against Libya for "days, not weeks," after which he said the U.S. would take more of a supporting role, sources tell ABC News."

Here is your chance to correct or retract your original statement which is at best a major misunderstanding of the statement made or at worst just another lie calculated to undermine the United State's position as the beacon of democracy on the world stage. These anti-Americans would destroy freedom itself while pursuing their mad-dog attacks on the President.

It’s simple. Info from the link you provided proves your statement wrong. You can ignore the fact you were wrong which means this thread is total bullshit, change the subject, or attack someone or something to divert attention from you being wrong yet again.
Historically, this is the path you follow and the reaction I expect this time. Or you could man-up, admit you were wrong and explain why you posted this misinformation in the first place. Then I would admit I was wrong about my assessment of your possible responses.

What say you?

Now think about how much it has cost. I believe the total amount expended by the United States for the first 30 days of air operations was over $500 million USD.

I like the Air Force, but DAMN they got expensive toys!

In the end, whatever our "limited role" is, we will be spending money...a lot of money. And once we get contractors involved, it'll get worse.

Yep...that is what Obama promised more than four months ago...another phony promise from a failed leader....


http://abcnews.go.com/International/...ry?id=13164938


But the non-war war continues on...and so does our involvement....

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...-conflict.html Originally Posted by Whirlaway

What a dumb comment. No president ever tells the truth about how long a war will last. Look at Iraq, Viet Nam, Korea, etc. You are a blind fool who only sees the things that support your hatred, just as the other side only sees the things that supports theirs.

I suggest you wait until we are out of Iraq, see how many days it took after someone declaired "mission accomplished", then wait that many days until you gripe about Lybia.

But no, you will almost certainly come up with some sicko math that "proves" we've been in Lybia longer than we have been in Iraq plus Afghanistan combined. Buffoon!

What a dumb comment. No president ever tells the truth about how long a war will last. Look at Iraq, Viet Nam, Korea, etc. You are a blind fool who only sees the things that support your hatred, just as the other side only sees the things that supports theirs.

I suggest you wait until we are out of Iraq, see how many days it took after someone declaired "mission accomplished", then wait that many days until you gripe about Lybia.

But no, you will almost certainly come up with some sicko math that "proves" we've been in Lybia longer than we have been in Iraq plus Afghanistan combined. Buffoon! Originally Posted by Old-T

LOL....you tell'm Old-T!

Whirlaway, you knows you are spouting stupid shit when you got me and Old-T agreeing!

Old-T , I'm reading a pretty darn good book that explains why we think the way we do....The Believing Brain. Cuts to the chase on why there are two groups throwing shit at each other across the fence.

http://www.amazon.com/Believing-Brai.../dp/0805091254

LOL....you tell'm Old-T!

Whirlaway, you knows you are spouting stupid shit when you got me and Old-T agreeing!

Old-T , I'm reading a pretty darn good book that explains why we think the way we do....The Believing Brain. Cuts to the chase on why there are two groups throwing shit at each other across the fence.

http://www.amazon.com/Believing-Brai.../dp/0805091254 Originally Posted by WTF

What about the weak scholarship and the fact that a H.S. psychology teacher doesn't like it? When will you learn how to figure out the real issues?

When will Will Robinson's dad stop at a gas station and ask for directions back to Earth?

Reminds me of Slick Willy.....he says it will last days but then says it won't....Obama says he is for nuclear power, then says he isn't, he says he supports a balanced budget ammendment but then does the rhetorical head fake again...and it goes on and on with this guy...he says he has a plan, but then Carney can't produce it....see the trend ?

Here is the President's statement from the top link.

"President Obama told a bipartisan group of members of Congress today that he expects the U.S. would be actively involved in any military action against Libya for "days, not weeks," after which he said the U.S. would take more of a supporting role, sources tell ABC News."

What say you?
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Right wingers are apparently not smart enough to follow a sentence that conveys more than one thought. "Actively involved" and "supporting role"'just go in one ear and out the other. Or maybe they can't hear as well as they should because they have the establishment's dick stuck in one ear and hanging out the other!!!

I connect the dots ! It is easy PigNASuit, give it a try......Obama says he isn't for a single payer healthcare system one day, then on another (and in private) he says it is his ultimate goal..he says he is for a balanced budget but won't produce one, or vote for the ammendment, he says he will close Gitmo, then says it can't be done....he says he will get us out of Afghanistan, but that war continues and now he has us in a 3rd war, he says he will post all legislation on line for 3 days before voting but then does otherwise, he says with the $1 trillion stimulus unemployment won't go over 8.0%, yada yada.....he is the new congential liar, appropriately replacing the old one !

Right wingers are apparently not smart enough to follow a sentence that conveys more than one thought. "Actively involved" and "supporting role"'just go in one ear and out the other. Or maybe they can't hear as well as they should because they have the establishment's dick stuck in one ear and hanging out the other!!! Originally Posted by TexHomoHog

HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! I love the way your rhetoric has gotten cruder....makes me think my bitch-slaps are having an effect....

If by supporting role, you mean doing most of the work, I agree.....those Frenchies ran out of bombs and equipment.....NATO can't do this kind of work, so the majority is being done by us....we do most of the work but none of the leading HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!....of course, it is a half-ass job.....rules of engagement are wimpy.....Odumbo sure doesn't like to lead.....I have no idea who the Libyan rebels are, and neither does Odumbo....nobody really knows if removing moammar gadhafi is in our best interests, but Odumbo is committed.....if he would have started the campaign a month earlier when the rebels had the advantage, it would have been mission accomplished in only days....but no, Odumbo had to suck the cock of every UN member first.......Odumbo doesn't believe in American Exceptionism and in being the leader of the free world.......

Reminds me of Slick Willy.....he says it will last days but then says it won't The English language is apparently tricky for even the native born. You either don't know what the lack of the word "expect" does to your statement or are intentionally misleading (you know, lying) people by your omission of it.....Obama says he is for nuclear power, then says he isn't, he says he supports a balanced budget ammendment but then does the rhetorical head fake again...and it goes on and on with this guy...he says he has a plan, but then Carney can't produce it....see the trend ? Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Yes Slick Whirly, I see it.

You will continue making vague, non-definitive statements which are bordering on or outright "non-factual" and you won't produce a link to save your life.

Here is the link:

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obam...ed-budget-amen


Obama says: "President Barack Obama says America does not need a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution, and he once again blamed much of the fiscal problem on Bush-era tax cuts.

“We don’t need a constitutional amendment to do our jobs,” Obama told reporters at his Friday news conference. “The Constitution already tells us to do our jobs -- and to make sure that the government is living within its means and making responsible choices.”

Ok,,,,so why hasn't this guy produced a balanced budget? His most recent budget (the prior budget was passed 849 days ago), had defecits skyrocking, adding trillions to our debt !

We need a balanced budget because guys like Obama are driving our economy off the cliff !

Some day I will come on here and find that the fringe wackos actually address a question asked of them.

But today is not that day. Not that I am surprised. They are too filled with hate and the RW Talking Points of the Day to actually LISTEN or--heaven forbid--THINK!

The point I made is that every politician says one thing today and equivicates tomorrow. They have to because there are far too many dolts who have the right to vote, and too few of the dolts bother to think.

Whirl, Munch, Mitch, and the rest of the mindless zombie brigade, keep on droning to the beat of your hob nailed boots.

-----

Some day I will come on here and find that the fringe wackos actually address a question asked of them. You doofus, you never asked a question..all you did is opine !

But today is not that day. Not that I am surprised. They are too filled with hate and the RW Talking Points of the Day to actually LISTEN or--heaven forbid--THINK! Wow; you nailed it Old T ! Throwing the "hater" word around lends so much intelligence to you post !

The point I made is that every politician says one thing today and equivicates tomorrow. They have to because there are far too many dolts who have the right to vote, and too few of the dolts bother to think. Ok; big f-ing observation ! You win the astute ECCIE post of the day award!
Whirl, Munch, Mitch, and the rest of the mindless zombie brigade, keep on droning to the beat of your hob nailed boots. Originally Posted by Old-T