Keep this philosophy in mind the next time you hear or are about to repeat a rumor:
In ancient Greece (469 - 399 BC), Socrates was widely lauded for his wisdom. One day the great philosopher came upon an acquaintance, who ran up to him excitedly and said, "Socrates, do you know what I just heard about one of your students ...?"
"Wait a moment," Socrates replied. "Before you tell me, I'd like you to pass a little test. It's called the Test of Three."
"Test of Three?"
"That's correct," Socrates continued. "Before you talk to me about my student let's take a moment to test what you're going to say. The first
test is Truth. Have you made absolutely sure that what you are about to tell me is true?"
"No," the man replied, "actually I just heard about it."
"All right," said Socrates. "So you don't really know if it's true or not. Now let's try the second test, the test of Goodness. Is what you are about to tell me about my student something good?"
"No, on the contrary..."
"So," Socrates continued, "you want to tell me something bad about him even though you're not certain it's true?"
The man shrugged, a little embarrassed.
Socrates continued, "You may still pass though, because there is a third test -- the filter of usefulness. Is what you want to tell me about my student going to be useful to me?"
"No, not really..."
"Well," concluded Socrates, "if what you want to tell me is neither True nor Good nor even Useful, why tell it to me at all?"
The man was defeated and ashamed and said no more.
This is the reason Socrates was a great philosopher and held in such high esteem. It also explains why Socrates never found out that Plato
was banging his wife.
- St.Mateo
- 11-12-2010, 02:20 AM
- sexydiamond
- 11-12-2010, 02:47 AM
Keep this philosophy in mind the next time you hear or are about to repeat a rumor:I like that!!!
In ancient Greece (469 - 399 BC), Socrates was widely lauded for his wisdom. One day the great philosopher came upon an acquaintance, who ran up to him excitedly and said, "Socrates, do you know what I just heard about one of your students ...?"
"Wait a moment," Socrates replied. "Before you tell me, I'd like you to pass a little test. It's called the Test of Three."
"Test of Three?"
"That's correct," Socrates continued. "Before you talk to me about my student let's take a moment to test what you're going to say. The first
test is Truth. Have you made absolutely sure that what you are about to tell me is true?"
"No," the man replied, "actually I just heard about it."
"All right," said Socrates. "So you don't really know if it's true or not. Now let's try the second test, the test of Goodness. Is what you are about to tell me about my student something good?"
"No, on the contrary..."
"So," Socrates continued, "you want to tell me something bad about him even though you're not certain it's true?"
The man shrugged, a little embarrassed.
Socrates continued, "You may still pass though, because there is a third test -- the filter of usefulness. Is what you want to tell me about my student going to be useful to me?"
"No, not really..."
"Well," concluded Socrates, "if what you want to tell me is neither True nor Good nor even Useful, why tell it to me at all?"
The man was defeated and ashamed and said no more.
This is the reason Socrates was a great philosopher and held in such high esteem. It also explains why Socrates never found out that Plato
was banging his wife. Originally Posted by St.Mateo
- LazurusLong
- 11-12-2010, 12:33 PM
The problem is that some folks don't understand that what may not be useful to them may be useful to me and some others. This hobby has risks and most of us choose to minimize those risks by how we choose to see providers.
I for one don't go look for working girls on the street and haven't been to a strip club in a couple years due to my risk aversion level.
Say a provider has an incurable disease that will harm others, it would be very bad for her to have that "rumor" spread unless there is proof (which is a slippery slope in this hobby).
Proof such as a person who would know intimate details of such a thing and would even be able to share that with the ECCIE staff.
I know the current position of the ECCIE staff prohibits such disclosure of "rumors" like that but doesn't the site need to weight more than what Socrates postulated in the text above and examine the wider population who could be harmed unless this matter was disclosed?
I for one don't go look for working girls on the street and haven't been to a strip club in a couple years due to my risk aversion level.
Say a provider has an incurable disease that will harm others, it would be very bad for her to have that "rumor" spread unless there is proof (which is a slippery slope in this hobby).
Proof such as a person who would know intimate details of such a thing and would even be able to share that with the ECCIE staff.
I know the current position of the ECCIE staff prohibits such disclosure of "rumors" like that but doesn't the site need to weight more than what Socrates postulated in the text above and examine the wider population who could be harmed unless this matter was disclosed?