Tired of the BP Review Non-Sense

Ever since I've been a member of eccie, I've noticed how the worst reviews tend to get the most comments and highest circulation, especially in the Houston forums. There has been countless threads and post about LE and their use of BP to set up stings, robberies, pimps, nc/ns, and bait and switch. Why does it seem that at least 90% of the b&s or recommendation of "no" come from BP. FYI what's to review if it's a nc/ns, or a canceled session due to a b&s? Yet these reviews constantly push the worth while reviews further down the recent post line.

Why does a website that does not verify allowed to have reviews take up the space of verified provider reviews. I'm not saying that BP reviews should be banned, but shit, what's wrong with them having their own review section like MPs & Agencies?

Maybe if we started reviewing street walkers then we'd get some changes around here.

~Scorpio

You tell em daddy. It does make sense give them there own forum..

Ever since I've been a member of eccie, I've noticed how the worst reviews tend to get the most comments and highest circulation, especially in the Houston forums. There has been countless threads and post about LE and their use of BP to set up stings, robberies, pimps, nc/ns, and bait and switch. Why does it seem that at least 90% of the b&s or recommendation of "no" come from BP. FYI what's to review if it's a nc/ns, or a canceled session due to a b&s? Yet these reviews constantly push the worth while reviews further down the recent post line.

Why does a website that does not verify allowed to have reviews take up the space of verified provider reviews. I'm not saying that BP reviews should be banned, but shit, what's wrong with them having their own review section like MPs & Agencies?

Maybe if we started reviewing street walkers then we'd get some changes around here.

~Scorpio Originally Posted by scorpioseventy7

Here's the thing.

BP isn't for everyone and I highly don't recommend that newbies go that route because as you pointed out its very risky but then again so is the hobby in general.

Believe it or not BP reviews are useful to some moreover every now and then new talent comes from it.......hell even some of the girls that are HDH and top notch started off on BP so needless to say the purpose of allowing BP reviews on ECCIE is to allow for the flow of information to continue.

As to why people bump them up well for a variety of reasons, some love drama and some just feel like making a comment or whatever but thats why we tell people the search button is your friend.
Yea it sucks certain reviews get pushed down but in all reality you should be doing your homework and researching anyways which is why we have showcases, the review tab under providers name and a shitload of other tools to help navigate............besides we move NCNS's to the co-ed even if she's not on Eccie there have been instances where they join to dispute it and eventually become members.

As far as SW's go, well they are reviewed and have been since ASPD. Those are located in the "Other reviews" section along with TS's, Mocco and other realms of the hobby. BP just doesn't fit that criteria since the girls there are advertising as escorts.

So BP reviews wont be going anywhere man sorry.

Verified girls get the reviews pushed down because they are verified. You've already read many reviews on the verified girls nothing new is most likely there. Bp is the start for just about all of the chicks here. The only reason most of the chicks here don't do the same shit as the chicks on bp is they know they will get called out on it. Hell we go chicks here that get called nuts and bat shit crazy on each review, girls that offer BBFS, we got pimps here too. Fuck even claims the mods want free pussy. So to think that some how this site is just the pennicale of all hookerdom is false it's the same shit just a bit more controlled. Don't give so much respect to the verified provider tag it means nothing at all no one checks the girls out. If they have an ad on bp in a few days they can be a verified provider.

Ever since I've been a member of eccie, I've noticed how the worst reviews tend to get the most comments and highest circulation, especially in the Houston forums. There has been countless threads and post about LE and their use of BP to set up stings, robberies, pimps, nc/ns, and bait and switch. Why does it seem that at least 90% of the b&s or recommendation of "no" come from BP. FYI what's to review if it's a nc/ns, or a canceled session due to a b&s? Yet these reviews constantly push the worth while reviews further down the recent post line.

Why does a website that does not verify allowed to have reviews take up the space of verified provider reviews. I'm not saying that BP reviews should be banned, but shit, what's wrong with them having their own review section like MPs & Agencies?

Maybe if we started reviewing street walkers then we'd get some changes around here.

~Scorpio Originally Posted by scorpioseventy7

I fucking LOVE this man !!!

However, this isn't Burger King - we wont be having it our way, hehehe

What would this board be without bp reviews, some men like to shop around and they love bp, and they like blab how their sessions went, its a review board.

A good portion of ladies that are reviewed are verified providers here. Lol

Plus reading a good bp review of pimps,lies, and the strangeness makes such good reading at times.

Ever wonder why most reviews from BP has BP in the title? For example; Review: TOFTT with BP Betty Big Lips or Review: BP Dolly Suckmouth took me for a sucker!!! Or perhaps why we almost never see Review: Janet Reno of P411 is a doll or Review: Eccie Diamond Star is The Best!!

Why is this so, because BP wants and need their own unverified provider review section. Otherwise there would be no need to warn us that this review is gona suck. The fact of the matter is, is that verification, screening, reviews & boards such as eccie has made the hobby safer for the escort/hobbyist. Websites such as BP are not the same and do not give a shit about either party or the industry as a whole. Furthermore, their so called escorts do not either, otherwise they'd get off their lazy asses and get with an agency or get verified, post a showcase and screen like the rest of the escorts that have exercised some diligence. In short, verified escorts go the extra step to get verified, and pay for screening services because they need better exposure, and with that exposure comes reviews and with reviews comes revenue.

To break it down to a 3rd grade level....in so many ways, verified escorts pay to get reviewed. And I don't see how it is fair to the escort or the hobbyist for that matter, who pays annual fees for screening or premium access to review sites, for someone who does not, to enjoy the same benefit. It's about paying dues. If a BP escort wants to be reviewed in the verified independent provider section, then she should get her ass verified. But just like there's a difference between hookers, escorts, sugar babies, and courtesans; there's a diffidence between hobbyist and and johns. I do not expect a john that merely wants to frequent escorts to understand the logic of a connoisseur of gifted companions. We are not the same.

SS7 just made me hot!
Thanks

good reading.... Things to ponder...

Great read...Very interesting thoughts..

Why is this so, because BP wants and need their own unverified provider review section. Otherwise there would be no need to warn us that this review is gona suck. The fact of the matter is, is that verification, screening, reviews & boards such as eccie has made the hobby safer for the escort/hobbyist. Websites such as BP are not the same and do not give a shit about either party or the industry as a whole. Furthermore, their so called escorts do not either, otherwise they'd get off their lazy asses and get with an agency or get verified, post a showcase and screen like the rest of the escorts that have exercised some diligence. In short, verified escorts go the extra step to get verified, and pay for screening services because they need better exposure, and with that exposure comes reviews and with reviews comes revenue. Originally Posted by scorpioseventy7

I am not a fan a BP myself but as Mojo has already said....

There is most likely NOTHING that can or will be done about members who want to post their experiences with providers on BP in the Review sections

There are also plenty of "Verified Eccie Providers" who use BP as well...and profit from it. It's just another avenue whether one likes it or not.

To break it down to a 3rd grade level....in so many ways, verified escorts pay to get reviewed. Originally Posted by scorpioseventy7

I don't know many escorts on here that pay to get reviewed

If a BP escort wants to be reviewed in the verified independent provider section, then she should get her ass verified. Originally Posted by scorpioseventy7

It's just a Independent Review section, a provider does not have to be "verified" in order to receive a review or a hobbyist to write a review of her

But just like there's a difference between hookers, escorts, sugar babies, and courtesans; there's a diffidence between hobbyist and and johns. I do not expect a john that merely wants to frequent escorts to understand the logic of a connoisseur of gifted companions. We are not the same. Originally Posted by scorpioseventy7

IMHO, either you're paying for it or you're selling it...there is NO difference.

Hookers, Escorts, & Courtesans expect to be paid...Tricks, Johns, & Hobbyist pay





Scorpio, your concerns should be brought up the Admins/Owners if you feel so strongly about them....

Just my lil .02

Maybe if we started reviewing street walkers then we'd get some changes around here.
Originally Posted by scorpioseventy7

They already do in the "other reviews" section.

The fact of the matter is, is that verification, screening, reviews & boards such as eccie has made the hobby safer for the escort/hobbyist. Websites such as BP are not the same and do not give a shit about either party or the industry as a whole. Originally Posted by scorpioseventy7

Well Eccie and BP are not the same. Eccie is a discussion board, its built for hobbyiest to gather information and make informed decisions. BP is a straight up ad site, their sole existence is advertising nothing more.

Furthermore, their so called escorts do not either, otherwise they'd get off their lazy asses and get with an agency or get verified, post a showcase and screen like the rest of the escorts that have exercised some diligence. Originally Posted by scorpioseventy7

Verified escorts had to start somewhere right? At one point those lazy asses you speak of started off as bp girls and some turned into the HDH's and highly reviewed ladies on ECCIE, p411, and other places. You have it all wrong though, some girls that give good service on BP are new and im sure being a new provider is not easy. You dont know who to trust and where to go.

Ever since I've been a member of eccie, I've noticed how the worst reviews tend to get the most comments and highest circulation, especially in the Houston forums. There has been countless threads and post about LE and their use of BP to set up stings, robberies, pimps, nc/ns, and bait and switch. Why does it seem that at least 90% of the b&s or recommendation of "no" come from BP. FYI what's to review if it's a nc/ns, or a canceled session due to a b&s? Yet these reviews constantly push the worth while reviews further down the recent post line.

Why does a website that does not verify allowed to have reviews take up the space of verified provider reviews. I'm not saying that BP reviews should be banned, but shit, what's wrong with them having their own review section like MPs & Agencies?

Maybe if we started reviewing street walkers then we'd get some changes around here.

~Scorpio Originally Posted by scorpioseventy7

Totally agree with Scorpio!

LOL I can see it...Pretty soon we will have 50 different review categories:

Independant Reviews
BP Reviews
Eros Reviews
TER Reviews
Whatever Ad sites the girls use Reviews
and so on...

Why make it more difficult than it needs to be? Those sites are just some of the sites that girls use for advertisement. Like others have stated, some of the girls here are on BP as well. So where would the review go? Too much hassle imo. Hell most of the ppl here don't even put their reviews in the right category.