So the New York Times writes a story that Trump may be a national security problem because he "lost" the election under unusual circumstances and he can use his knowledge of national security to trip up Biden. The take away is that Trump is different from all other former presidents somehow. I guess being a businessman is not as good as being a politician. So, we either kill Trump (and by extension; Carter, Clinton, Bush, and Obama) or we tell the POTUS nothing when he is in office. That's how they feel about Trump.
At the same time, the New York Times publishes a story about how Biden should be getting national security briefings now. Before we know if he will take office, before we know if he is competent to have this information, before we know that China does not have him or Hunter by the short hairs.
Can someone explain this disparity to me. Not being a liberal I have trouble with fantasy.