blonde trying to comprehend

what are the" tebows "?
MC's Avatar
  • MC
  • 09-28-2012, 12:46 AM
I'm guessing it has to do with the prayer pose that Tim Tebow does.



"Tebowing"
offshoredrilling's Avatar
Lexxxy's Avatar
Holy hell, I just learned something new, I had no clue either.
richguy2851's Avatar
Yes, that behavior, along with pointing to the sky, which is often demonstrated by hypocritical athletes, directly attributed to lessons from a book, written a long time ago by men telling men, and espcially women, what they should do and not do.
Perfect Gentleman's Avatar
HEEE HEE Bet you thought they were talking about some new sexual position.
MC's Avatar
  • MC
  • 09-28-2012, 09:15 PM
Originally Posted by jackfengshui
Mid-Session Tebow would be funny as hell.
Franklin4's Avatar
WOW!!!
Pornstar Samantha Saint tebowing:

GP's Avatar
  • GP
  • 09-29-2012, 08:27 AM
Ahem....

#12 - Respect the posted "Image Standards" which apply to our public coed forums. (including Showcase) In short, images which depict subjects which are topless are allowed, but below the waist nudity which displays exposed genitalia or images depicting pornography are to be avoided. Additionally, posting URL links to external sites depicting pornography is not permitted. (use RTM to report images which you feel may not be in compliance)
but it is nice!
brutusbluto's Avatar
Actually, it has been determined by the powers that be that only if labia is explicitly showing as in a wide open shot of the genitalia region would be in violation of the image standards. The pics in this thread are all OK.
great photo, sexy and funny, happy to see the mods, and the eccie powers to approve
Lexxxy's Avatar
I am laughing so hard imagining a review with it.
"DFK,FIV,K9, Tebowing, Russian, Bbbj, & Facial while Tebowing"
GP's Avatar
  • GP
  • 09-30-2012, 07:03 AM
Actually, it has been determined by the powers that be that only if labia is explicitly showing as in a wide open shot of the genitalia region would be in violation of the image standards. The pics in this thread are all OK. Originally Posted by brutusbluto
Thanks for the update BB. Just going by what past practice has been. Perhaps the "powers that be" should revise the rule to indicate the new leniency in image standards.