Encounter: Great time at the Bird

User ID: -
Date: Early December
Name: Flamingo Club
Phone: -
Email Address: -
URL / Website: -
City: Lawrence
State: Kansas
Address: East Lawrence
Activities: Lap dance, convo
Hair Length and Color: -
Age: -
Smoking Status: -
Ethnic Background: -
Physical Description: Girls were really cute. Nice variety.
Recommendation: Yes
I'm curious why one would go to the bird instead of driving a little bit further out of town and getting some full contact at Paradise Saloon. Haven't been to either in probably over 10 years, so I'm interested in the current situation out there.
TailHooked's Avatar
You are getting full contact at the Bird for the same price as you do at at Paradise. Now you pay more for the VIP room at Paradise, they get nude. Won't do you much. There are cameras to cover every inch of Paradise now. It is just there are better looking girls at the Bird. Paradise can't keep enough decent girls because it is slow most of the time. The club is 4 yrs behind on property taxes. Someone pulled up Douglas County records and showed me. I heard from a regular that the owner borrowed money from a doorman and still hadn't paid him back in full. Also stiffed a contractor.
The club is 4 yrs behind on property taxes. Someone pulled up Douglas County records and showed me. I heard from a regular that the owner borrowed money from a doorman and still hadn't paid him back in full. Also stiffed a contractor. Originally Posted by TailHooked
But, apparently they could afford to put cameras everywhere, so now there's even less reason to go there.
They should pull the cameras and let some fun happen for cash flow.
Do they do that for liability purposes? Honestly if I owned one, i'd have a couple cameras on the main floor and outside, but in VIP I wouldn't. If dancers get caught giving extras, is the building owner liable? If not, then I don't understand why they would do it.
TailHooked's Avatar
Do they do that for liability purposes? Honestly if I owned one, i'd have a couple cameras on the main floor and outside, but in VIP I wouldn't. If dancers get caught giving extras, is the building owner liable? If not, then I don't understand why they would do it. Originally Posted by Jayhawk69
I am sure it helps with liability. In the past only the cash register, VIP, front vestibule and parking had cameras. You know the staff and owner used to watch the VIP videos of all the guys trying to get extras. A bartender told me. To a degree it was tolerated. Now if the owner saw a girl doing extras that he liked and who turned him down, both the girl and customer would be banned. Times used to be good there. At one time Sidney Simms, Sweet Salem, Red and a couple of others worked there at the same time. All reviewed here. The owner knew they had ads up too. There was even a 17 yr old who got by management for a week or so. A couple of guys got banned for meeting her outside the club. KBI came inquiring not long after.
Times have changed. Wish it would go backwards some and fun would happen. I would actually spend money there. I've stopped there a few times only a few where attractive.
Man, sad to hear it's gone downhill like that. Used to be my favorite years ago.