The topic was the movie 2000 mules. The topic is still 2000 mules.
You obviously didn't look at any of the readily available information on why the data collection methods used couldn't provide the info the movie presented as fact.
If I know the information is suspect and why it is suspect, (besides knowing it's produced by a convicted felon who made illegal campaign contributions in a federal election) why would I waste my time and money watching it(rhetorical question)?
After hearing all the negative reviews about its conclusions, why wouldn't you check out the validity of the experts in the field who said it was impossible to arrive at the conclusions using the available system and equipment?
Did you say maturity when you meant senility since there's no real evidence of any fraud mentioned in the movie was committed? Please explain.
The produces, as did true the vote, refused to supply requested data and methodology needed to confirm results.
https://www.factcheck.org/2022/06/ev...iAAEgLyC_D_BwE
https://www.reuters.com/article/fact...-idUSL2N2XJ0OQ
https://apnews.com/article/2022-midt...fa5c6dac406762
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/29/u...cy-theory.html
Unlike some I know what I said. I am also mature enough to figure out on my own who received those 100 of thousand arrested ballots.
Watch it, you might actually learn something
Originally Posted by oilfieldace