Six women actually agreed on something. Amazing! Originally Posted by mwsatxHere's another amazing fact. All six of those women were middle aged and never had children. They possibly saw George Zimmerman as the son they never had. Now would you convict your only child? Hmmm, maybe that was the strategy.
At least one woman was a mother and another spoke of her husband and SON shooting guns. So that's two mothers.It doesn't take a "mother" to comprehend rules, laws, and the importance of obeying them.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/george-zimm...ry?id=19437833 Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Here's another amazing fact. All six of those women were middle aged and never had children. They possibly saw George Zimmerman as the son they never had. Now would you convict your only child? Hmmm, maybe that was the strategy.Here's a factual FYI: five of the women had children.
Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
Why are you trying to pick an argument when I just pointed out that at least two of the jurors had children? Originally Posted by JD BarleycornI'm not. Just challenging your suggestion that "motherhood" (emotionalism) had something to do with the decision, which is a sexist (gender biased) remark.
Here's another amazing fact. All six of those women were middle aged and never had children. They possibly saw George Zimmerman as the son they never had. Now would you convict your only child? Hmmm, maybe that was the strategy.Among many dumb comments on a topic filled with dumb comments, this might actually be the dumbest.
Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
Here's another amazing fact. All six of those women were middle aged and never had children. They possibly saw George Zimmerman as the son they never had. Now would you convict your only child? Hmmm, maybe that was the strategy.Where did you get your "amazing fact", which is, of course, false?
Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin