Encounter: Blair in CoMo

User ID: Blair_Fox
Date: June 2021
Name: Blair Fox
Phone: 573) 206-8866
Email Address: -
URL / Website: https://tryst.link/escort/naughtygirlnextdoor
City: Columbia
State: Missouri
Address: East side of town
Activities: DFK, DATY, DATO, BBBJ, CFS, CG, mish, FIV
Hair Length and Color: Shoulder length, blonde
Age: 22
Smoking Status: Smoker
Ethnic Background: White/Caucasian
Physical Description: Spinner-type body, petite, with bolt-ons. Tattoos all over. She is pretty, but with a lot of acne scars - covered with caked on make-up. Nose-ring. She is the girl in the pics, but those are carefully picked and edited, no doubt.
Recommendation: No

Thanks for the review but why post about something that happened 3 months ago??? She seems really young and new so the ‘No’ recommendation seemed a little unnecessary but to each their own. Hope your next encounter is up to your expectations! Cheers!

Thanks for the review but why post about something that happened 3 months ago??? She seems really young and new so the ‘No’ recommendation seemed a little unnecessary but to each their own. Hope your next encounter is up to your expectations! Cheers! Originally Posted by Yourmvp

I agree with you that the "NO" recommendation was not correct.
It should have been "HELL NO"
Poor service should never be rewarded.

Thanks for the review but why post about something that happened 3 months ago??? She seems really young and new so the ‘No’ recommendation seemed a little unnecessary but to each their own. Hope your next encounter is up to your expectations! Cheers! Originally Posted by Yourmvp

Honestly, I felt a bit bad about that recommendation because it's certainly possible that she'll up her game. But I could not recommend her as a "yes" either. Surely, you read my reasoning in the ROS. I know it was a late review, but it was accurate for when I saw her... it was only several weeks ago. Hopefully, she improves and "yes" recommendations will outnumber mine. I was simply being honest; if I wrote it right after my visit, I think it would have been a harsher review. This one is tempered with time.

Honestly, I felt a bit bad about that recommendation because it's certainly possible that she'll up her game. But I could not recommend her as a "yes" either. Surely, you read... Originally Posted by Rootup

A false "yes" will never lead to this.

...mine. I was simply being honest; if I wrote it right after my visit, I think it would have been a harsher review. This one is tempered with time. Originally Posted by Rootup

That's the entire point of the review. At times it's tough to give that "no" review, but if it's warranted, then it needs to be stated so. I believe a "no" review does require more time to write for the reasoning you provided.

Thanks for appreciating that. I understand that a review closer to the date of the encounter is helpful generally... in this case, I don't think it makes a difference much. I still stand by my "no" recommendation based on this encounter.