A case in point that makes the distinction - sex was okay, pictures were not...
http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2012/06/...ures-were-not/
Doesnt matter if the photos are made public. According to the law he filmed or took pictures of child porn, and then sent those pictures via the internet. He took them, possessed them, and sent them. 8 years doesnt seem long enough. Originally Posted by KenMonkIf she wasn't of legal age to consent to sex I would agree with you.
#10 - Topics regarding children, and certain images depicting children are not material for an adult-themed board. You must be at least 18 years of age to register and participate here, and along those lines, our subject matter is to surround individuals of the proper age range. Any mention or reference to underage sex is strictly forbidden and may result in loss of your posting privileges.Nuff said? Closed