USA TODAY No collusion: How Americans were fed a false tale about Donald Trump's 2016 campaign

  • oeb11
  • 11-09-2021, 05:32 AM
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opini...ezH?li=BBnb7Kz





Does anyone still believe the story that Donald Trump colluded with Vladimir Putin to win the 2016 presidential election? If so, special counsel John Durham’s indictment of Igor Danchenko should put their minds at rest.
© The Associated Press Special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation was supposed to have been the grand reckoning for Donald Trump, the comprehensive exposure of the colluders and how they undermined American democracy. Mueller’s 2019 report was long on how Moscow attempted to interfere in the 2016 election. But on the matter of collusion with the Trump campaign, Mueller came up empty. The 39-page document is rich with detail on the origins, use and abuse of the Russian collusion story as a means to undermine the 2016 Trump campaign.

Danchenko is identified as the person who collected information “that ultimately formed the core of the allegations” in the infamous dossier by Christopher Steele. Danchenko was indicted on lying to the FBI in 2017 about who he was working with and where his information came from.
Start the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.
Source linked to Hillary Clinton

The indictment exposes former Hillary Clinton aide Charles Dolan, identified only as “PR Executive-1,” as an important Danchenko source. Dolan allegedly fed Danchenko information he claimed he had obtained when he “had a drink with a GOP friend,” but later admitted he had fabricated the story. The indictment also shows that PR Executive-1 was an important source for reporting by The Washington Post and the Times of London when the Steele dossier scandal broke in January 2017.
The Danchenko indictment is particularly telling in detailing how the fake story was inserted into the political ecosystem, starting with Dolan and perhaps others. Danchenko allegedly fed the falsehoods to Steele, a British former intelligence operative hired by Fusion GPS to conduct the research.
Fusion GPS had been retained by Clinton campaign lawyer Marc Elias, whom law professor Johnathan Turley has called a "potential apex target” of the Durham probe. Clinton supporters in the government slipped the information to sympathetic operatives in the Justice Department, who used it to mount a spying campaign on Trump. And the American news media spread the rumors, which undermined the Trump presidency.
While the Danchenko indictment offers many new details on what was sold as a "well-developed conspiracy of cooperation" between the Trump campaign and Russia, ample evidence of the falsehood of this notion has been available for years.
Opinions in your inbox: Get a digest of our takes on current events every day
As early as October 2017, The Post reported that the “Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee helped fund research that resulted in a now-famous (Steele) dossier containing allegations about President Trump’s connections to Russia and possible coordination between his campaign and the Kremlin.”
As was later revealed, the dossier became the basis for Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants against Trump aide Carter Page, and unprecedented FBI surveillance on the Trump campaign before the election.
Accusations were a political dirty trick

By 2017, it was clear that “Russian collusion” was just a political dirty trick. But the narrative was firmly embedded in the liberal mind, and the wheels of the Washington investigative apparatus were turning, so the false story lived on.
Its legitimacy was bolstered in 2018 by Pulitzer Prizes awarded to The New York Times and The Washington Post for “deeply sourced, relentlessly reported coverage” of “Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and its connections to the Trump campaign, the President-elect’s transition team and his eventual administration.”
Special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation was supposed to have been the grand reckoning for Trump, the comprehensive exposure of the colluders and how they undermined American democracy. Mueller’s 2019 report was long on how Moscow attempted to interfere in the 2016 election. But on the matter of collusion with the Trump campaign, Mueller came up empty, and for good reason. The collusion never existed.
Now the Durham investigation is laying bare the extent of the conspiracy to derail the Trump campaign and thwart his presidency. The probe has so far led to the arrest of three people accused of spreading the false Russia conspiracy theory.
This is good news, and hopefully more indictments will follow. It is important to understand how operatives connected to the Hillary Clinton campaign conspired to harness the political system to undermine American democracy and weaken a legitimately elected president.
James S. Robbins, a member of USA TODAY's Board of Contributors and author of "This Time We Win: Revisiting the Tet Offensive," has taught at the National Defense University and the Marine Corps University and served as a special assistant in the office of the secretary of Defense in the George W. Bush administration. Follow him on Twitter: @James_Robbins



Comment - USA today - as AP - are publications of the LSM and democraticommunist propaganda arm
amd participated i teh Years long 'Big Lie" of 'Russian collusion" - a Lie still extant among democraticommunist nomenklatura and proletariat- one that H... and harris have publicly called for continuing to 'get to the bottom' of it."
The only 'bottoms - are the obese fat asses on those two criminals.


Yet teh LSM refuses to acknowledge its' "Big Lie" - and liberal posters on their forum still fall into line with the democaticommunist propaganda Lies - refuted in thjs piece..


So - to those 'true believers' in democraticommunist party propaganda and Lies - i write:
Sad - that Truth, FACTs, and Reality are Trumped Uber Alles by your marxist, racist ideology.



Buck fiden
From my cold dead hands!
  • oeb11
  • 11-09-2021, 06:07 AM
Addendums:


Durham Probe
Published 11 hours ago

WaPo media critic says Durham indictment is 'bad news' for those who hyped Steele dossier

Erik Wemple writes, 'A reckoning is years overdue'

https://www.foxnews.com/media/washin...steele-dossier


Greg Gutfeld: Of course the media won't admit it got the Steele dossier wrong

They have so much egg on their face, their eyeballs need Lipitor

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/greg...-dossier-wrong




Gregg Jarrett: The Hillary Clinton crony behind the phony dossier identified in Durham indictment

The genesis of the smear against Trump came from Hillary herself as a strategy to distract from her own email scandal

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/greg...ham-indictment
and all the deaf, dumb and blind Marxist wart hogs in here gobbled the lies hook line and sinker

(even the one claiming to be libertarian)
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Who you call in’ a wart hog, buddy?
pal, if you aren't a Marxist wart hog, then its not you
rexdutchman's Avatar
TDS started went billary lost ,,, theys just couldn't believe the plan FAILED
  • oeb11
  • 11-09-2021, 09:59 AM
a poster is still pissed off his inamorata H..... lost
Deservedly!
Not SAD!
... USA Today surely tryin' to re-write the way
their-own reporters buggered the goose with this.

Hmmm... How much should Trump sue the news-media
and FBI for slander and libel to His good name. $10 Billion??

### Salty