THIS Ad is NOT solicitation for prostitution or any sexual acts for profit. Donations R for Time & Companionship.

"Ad is NOT solicitation for prostitution or any sexual acts for profit. Donations R for Time & Companionship."

I read it all the time. What's the point? Do any of these girls or any of us guys really believe that the police can't lie to "entrap" us into breaking the law? Damn right they can! If you don't KNOW that learn to beat off! Is it really as silly as it seems to be? I get that the idea is that if your ever caught you might have some defensible position by claiming time was sold but sex was given. As my Daddy used to say, "I was born at night but not LAST night." However, I do understand what you are hoping to accomplish.

Years ago I took a nude modeling class and the class paid a different young girl - sometimes old and ugly girl - to sit for an hour while we painted and/or drew her. Nothing illegal there! I always thought that IF - one were to sell say 1 hours video session or 1 hour nude photo shoot sessions or one hour nude drawing posing sessions - I mean frankly the guy could draw you as a stick figure or take one picture - at which point you announce "Wow, I am getting so horny - wanna fool around?". Now, I am no lawyer, but to me that is a case that would be far more defensible then trying to convince a jury or judge the you are "only selling time" - look your honor - it says so right on the prostitution solicitation ad!

I do get that a young lady might not want a picture of herself turning up in say 20 years when she is married to the new chief of police who has no idea of her past and she is trying to keep her own daughter off the stripper pole - but let's be honest here - with today's selfie society that seems hell bend on publishing every boring detail of their mandate existence with photo blogs. I am pretty sure that in the future EVERY woman save the desperately hideous will have at least one compromising photo of herself dancing though the internet. (not to mention the myriad of dick pic that should be out there as well)

It might also suggest the direction the powers at be might decide to take should the world take that sudden turn toward legislating morality. I mean what could be wrong with a website that rates the quality of say nude models for paint, drawing or photos and/or nude amateur porn stars for budding amateur videographers?

Funny isn't it, should a woman want to kill a baby it is her right to choose what she does with her body - if she chooses to engage in the act that leads to a baby ... not so much? Perhaps if the world blows up tomorrow ECCIE - the escort client information exchange should become SSIXC - pronounced "sick" sexual surrogate information exchange and we can all start looking for someone to carry our next child. I mean not everyone can afford invetro-fertilization right? Some of us might want to do it the old fashion way - I certainly love old school .

Maintain position Scotty, continue to monitor - Kirk out!

Funny isn't it, should a woman want to kill a baby it is her right to choose what she does with her body - if she chooses to engage in the act that leads to a baby ... not so much? Originally Posted by 5T3V3

It is kinda hypocritical from the left, that they say 'its her body, its her choice' when it comes to abortions, but its NOT her body/her choice when it comes to making that baby (having sex, for pay)..

Well, as a photographer, I'm always looking for hot, aspiring models to shoot.


Got my bases covered.

"Ad is NOT solicitation for prostitution or any sexual acts for profit. Donations R for Time & Companionship."

I read it all the time. What's the point? Do any of these girls or any of us guys really believe that the police can't lie to "entrap" us into breaking the law? Damn right they can! If you don't KNOW that learn to beat off! Is it really as silly as it seems to be? I get that the idea is that if your ever caught you might have some defensible position by claiming time was sold but sex was given. As my Daddy used to say, "I was born at night but not LAST night." However, I do understand what you are hoping to accomplish.

Years ago I took a nude modeling class and the class paid a different young girl - sometimes old and ugly girl - to sit for an hour while we painted and/or drew her. Nothing illegal there! I always thought that IF - one were to sell say 1 hours video session or 1 hour nude photo shoot sessions or one hour nude drawing posing sessions - I mean frankly the guy could draw you as a stick figure or take one picture - at which point you announce "Wow, I am getting so horny - wanna fool around?". Now, I am no lawyer, but to me that is a case that would be far more defensible then trying to convince a jury or judge the you are "only selling time" - look your honor - it says so right on the prostitution solicitation ad!

I do get that a young lady might not want a picture of herself turning up in say 20 years when she is married to the new chief of police who has no idea of her past and she is trying to keep her own daughter off the stripper pole - but let's be honest here - with today's selfie society that seems hell bend on publishing every boring detail of their mandate existence with photo blogs. I am pretty sure that in the future EVERY woman save the desperately hideous will have at least one compromising photo of herself dancing though the internet. (not to mention the myriad of dick pic that should be out there as well)

It might also suggest the direction the powers at be might decide to take should the world take that sudden turn toward legislating morality. I mean what could be wrong with a website that rates the quality of say nude models for paint, drawing or photos and/or nude amateur porn stars for budding amateur videographers?

Funny isn't it, should a woman want to kill a baby it is her right to choose what she does with her body - if she chooses to engage in the act that leads to a baby ... not so much? Perhaps if the world blows up tomorrow ECCIE - the escort client information exchange should become SSIXC - pronounced "sick" sexual surrogate information exchange and we can all start looking for someone to carry our next child. I mean not everyone can afford invetro-fertilization right? Some of us might want to do it the old fashion way - I certainly love old school .

Maintain position Scotty, continue to monitor - Kirk out!
Originally Posted by 5T3V3

Damn valid points as any choir preached sermon should be. But you forgot to address the thesis of your argument and that is even as the handcuffs slap down and Little Miss Honeypot Timeshare broker is boohooing her case to officer Couldntcareless she's totally undermining herself with imprudent knowledge about what constitutes soliciting. An ad that accepts a sexual encounter could happen and isn't in exchange for something of no value still can be soliciting even if no one buys. The way we share our social media dialogue and street euphemisms totally negates the usefulness of coded words in place of actual legal jargon but the courts don't care how WE say it, it's how it's interpreted. To say we are offering time is just as silly to say it's sex because no one sells or offers blocks of time in an advertisement. Unless they own a timeshare.

Damn valid points as any choir preached sermon should be. But you forgot to address the thesis of your argument and that is even as the handcuffs slap down and Little Miss Honeypot Timeshare broker is boohooing her case to officer Couldntcareless she's totally undermining herself with imprudent knowledge about what constitutes soliciting. An ad that accepts a sexual encounter could happen and isn't in exchange for something of no value still can be soliciting even if no one buys. The way we share our social media dialogue and street euphemisms totally negates the usefulness of coded words in place of actual legal jargon but the courts don't care how WE say it, it's how it's interpreted. To say we are offering time is just as silly to say it's sex because no one sells or offers blocks of time in an advertisement. Unless they own a timeshare. Originally Posted by KayC_K

Not to interject but just ask every Lawyer,mechanic,plumber and many more if they sell their time in the phone book or online advertising.

To say we are offering time is just as silly to say it's sex because no one sells or offers blocks of time in an advertisement. Unless they own a timeshare. Originally Posted by KayC_K

I think you just invented a new hobby ... Timeshare Pussy! Oh wait, that's what sugar babies are for!? Damn, so close.

I swear though interesting idea ... How would that work ... work 5 days a week = 260 working days. Take a couple weeks vacation and some holidays let's say you work/timeshare 220 day year. Now rent that time for $800 a day which would earn $176,000 per year. Damn, pussy is a valuable fucking commodity! Pun intended.

And the ironic thing is most ladies don't actually give you the full amount of time you agree to pay for.

Damn valid points as any choir preached sermon should be. But you forgot to address the thesis of your argument and that is even as the handcuffs slap down and Little Miss Honeypot Timeshare broker is boohooing her case to officer Couldntcareless she's totally undermining herself with imprudent knowledge about what constitutes soliciting. An ad that accepts a sexual encounter could happen and isn't in exchange for something of no value still can be soliciting even if no one buys. The way we share our social media dialogue and street euphemisms totally negates the usefulness of coded words in place of actual legal jargon but the courts don't care how WE say it, it's how it's interpreted. To say we are offering time is just as silly to say it's sex because no one sells or offers blocks of time in an advertisement. Unless they own a timeshare. Originally Posted by KayC_K

I guess.

If you want to quit this and go work regular jobs, that's cool. Money's a lot slower. It takes MAAAAAANY hours to make in a week what you used to make in a day.

The whole system is a play on words. They do it...or used to. It's getting to the point where they don't care that you know they're scumbags. They're 'the law', and just about do what they want. That's the point where it's getting to. They don't give a shit about trampling on us, and will give less and less of a shit as time goes by...because no one will do anything about it.

I just ask the dude if he’s a cop. They have taught tell you, ya know...

I just ask the dude if he’s a cop. They have taught tell you, ya know... Originally Posted by B Three

No they don't. BY law, cops are allowed to lie.

I just ask the dude if he’s a cop. They have taught tell you, ya know... Originally Posted by B Three

I see you are new here. First off, welcome. Secondly, Gharkal is correct. That is one of the oldest misconceptions out there. Be careful. They will tell you "no" all the way up until they have enough evidence collected to slap a pair of cuffs on you.

Two dull bulbs there. lol

Maybe we need a Badge Detector App...one that can detect a cop badge up to within, say, 300 feet or something.

Maybe we need a Badge Detector App...one that can detect a cop badge up to within, say, 300 feet or something.

Originally Posted by Randall Creed

EL OH ELL!

[/B]

Not to interject but just ask every Lawyer,mechanic,plumber and many more if they sell their time in the phone book or online advertising.

Originally Posted by burkalini

If the advertised time included anything except conversation from their specific area of expertise it may be marketed at just time. But there isn't a lot of demand for the conversation and witty banter so it sounds a lot more like PROFESSIONAL CONSULTATION.