Was anything from eccie seized, turned over to, or taken by the feds or any state agency during the last few months?
How can I be assured by eccie that any information that I put on this website or even the act of viewing this website isn't being monitored by the feds?
In the months that eccie was down, the URL led to another website. Who is responsible for that website, why was it chosen as a redirect and what happened to the information of the people who signed up for it?
I notice that many of the mods or very frequent posters have not returned. Is there a reason for that besides "personal choice?" I can think of several people who posted 20+ times a day who aren't posting. Without naming names did anyone get arrested by the feds because of this site? Has anyone been told by "management" not to return?
On the other hand, I notice several posters who we're banned (I thought forever) from this site who have started posting again. Have all the points, suspension and bans been lifted?
Thanks!
Originally Posted by gnadfly
excellent questions indeed. i've wondered about all of these questions. it is my personal and professional opinion as a senior UNIX system administrator that the site was hacked. first, let's rule out the possibility that the site was seized by the FBI. if so, then
by law, the FBI would have posted their banner page stating so. it's law that they have to do so. just like backpage. no other US agency would have domestic jurisdiction to do so. not the CIA, the NSA or even Homeland Security.
since no banner page was put up, i feel certain the site was not seized then restored as some sort of shadow op. it would have been easier for the FBI to start their own site ..
and legal .. to do this. besides, who would login to a site that for several weeks had the FBI banner page displayed then suddenly returned as if nothing happened? i wouldn't.
so, this leaves three possibilities left. that the site was taken offline by the site owners or it was hacked. or it crashed.
let's discuss the possibility the site was taken offline i.e. a controlled shutdown of the server(s) by the owners. would the owners take the site offline, let it go "blank" for several weeks (not to mention the domain redirection, more on that in a moment) without posting a page stating so? i think not, as it would not be good for business. a simple webpage stating this is very easy to do. no need to return the basic bulletin board software to state the site was being restored (classic sign of either a hack or a crash). no such page was put up, meaning to me the site was not shutdown by the ownership to make changes.
now, two possibilities left. did it crash or was it hacked? if it crashed, again it would have been easy for the site via whoever hosts the site to display a notice that it had crashed and was in the process of being restored. that didn't happen. for weeks, the site displayed a blank page. surely, the hosting company could have displayed a page stating this, and/or restored the site much faster. this didn't happen
so let's discuss the domain redirection hack, a common hack technique. the site was hacked, in my opinion, and a "battle" began to control the domain name. this explains why the site displayed a blank page for over two weeks, then that bizarre site for another two weeks. i only tried that link once, it was blocked by my anti-virus software, Malware Bytes, as a malware site. i did not override that, as i could have, to see what exactly that site was. it was not ECCIE and certainly chock full of malware, so what was the point?
so, as far as i am concerned, the site was hacked, crashed by hackers, and these hackers did a domain redirection hack via the domain name. this is why it took over a month before the owners could regain control of the domain. it takes time to do that. since they are the rightful owners, they were eventually able to regain control and post the basic vbulletin board software stating the site was being restored. that they opted to make changes to address these new laws is just part of what happened.
it is my opinion, and there were rumors of such, that the site was hacked. the behavior of the site for over a month tends to indicates this.
the site ownership is not going to admit the site was hacked. would you? you would be acknowledging that some external hack group took your site offline? unless you are Experian, Bank of America or some other large public entity and
had to admit it, would you? No.
the site was hacked. that's my opinion. it fits the pattern of what happened.
that's the bad news. the good news is the site is back under the control of the rightful owners and there is no reason to fear the Fed's had any control even temporary, of the site.