You’ve no clue what the fuck you’re talking about Jack. But that doesn’t surprise me at all. Maybe you should actually read 1 decision she wrote and if you can comprehend it, you can make an educated statement about her common sense. Originally Posted by 1blackman1Just exactly what was that 1 decision she wrote that should catapult her into the Supreme Court?
Harvard undergradAnd it seems, dumb as a fence post.
Harvard law school
Harvard law review
Federal attorney trial experience
Private practice trial experience
10 years federal district judge
1 year federal appellate judge
That’s more experience than Barrett and slightly better than Kavanaugh. Originally Posted by 1blackman1
And it seems, dumb as a fence post.
She might define “the Peter principle” Originally Posted by Jackie S
The Peter principle is a concept in management developed by Laurence J. Peter, which observes that people in a hierarchy tend to rise to "a level of respective incompetence": employees are promoted based on their success in previous jobs until they reach a level at which they are no longer competent, as skills in one job do not necessarily translate to another.[1]
Harvard undergradWhat are her views on Crime, especially crimes which may involve those that have limited ability to defend themselves such as children, the elderly or the disabled? Education is a given, it isn't the only thing that makes a good judge.
Harvard law school
Harvard law review
Federal attorney trial experience
Private practice trial experience
10 years federal district judge
1 year federal appellate judge
That’s more experience than Barrett and slightly better than Kavanaugh. Originally Posted by 1blackman1