Rates are REALLY Being Driven Low

In an increasingly hollowed-out economy, most of us are working cheaper and cheaper (at least, in constant-dollar terms). Looks as if our sisters who do sex work are suffering with this noxious trend, too. Click here for the evidence. For those who don't elect to click through, it's a tabloid scandal story about how presidential candidate and U.S. Senator Ted Cruz is being accused of five mis-aimings of the "Cruz missile" at targets other than the one he's legally married to, including ... are you ready? ... a "$1,000 a night escort."

Day-ummmm! How'd he get an overnight for $1K? That's pretty low.

Yup, things are getting tough in the demimonde, if there's any truth to that.

Prolly threatened to put the vampire bite on her neck

Don't know where you are. But not the case in most cities I work.

Don't know where you are. But not the case in most cities I work. Originally Posted by Addison Nash

You make my point for me, ma'am. I checked your showcase, and your overnight is half again that ($1K). And the experience is worth every penny, I have no doubt.

Really, I just had a good chuckle over that breathless "$1000 a night call girl" stuff. Some ignoramus with a keyboard obviously thought that was impossibly high-end stuff. In fact, I've seen that rate, and even a tiny bit lower, offered by ladies who appeared substantial and reputable. But I think most ladies here, who specify an overnight rate at all, are talking quite a bit higher (such as your lovely self).

You think thats bad...look up what happened in greece when there economy collapsed. There was such a huge rush of women into escorting it drove the price down to $4.50 hr. Daaamn. If you dont think that is possible here think again how things will be if unemployment sky rockets with the already failing economy we have

I have done several over nights for $800 ... Not impossible ... But then again my strategy isn't to get naked and fuck for 8 hours straight. We have sex ... Then we eat dinner then we might watch a movie that we both would like to see or we could go out dancing or drinking if she likes maybe a little post movie session or post drinks session then we actually sleep and a nice little bang session in the morning and she is gone. It is more of a pay per pop pricing strategy than a pay by the hour strategy like most girls use but the ladies that charge that way seem to last longer and be happier with the hobby IMHO. It is definately a more GFE session in my opinion. Of course as always there is always some young dumb and full of cum idiot that will try and get 8 hours of strait fuck for $800 or 900 and fuck it all up for the rest of us.

I'm with you ST3V3. The good news for the ladies is the guys that can bang for 8 hours straight can't afford overnights. Those of us that can are more interested in the full GFE experience which includes dinner and potentially breakfast.

For every thread about low rates, I can show you 10 complaining about high rates.... what's the point? Simple economy - supply vs. demand and willingness and ability.

It is definately a more GFE session in my opinion. Of course as always there is always some young dumb and full of cum idiot that will try and get 8 hours of strait fuck for $800 or 900 and fuck it all up for the rest of us. Originally Posted by 5T3V3

Actually I find that those idiots actually make a true BFE date look more desirable by contrast. It is good something can make me look good--it certainly isn't my receding hairline.

I think this proves that Republicans play dirty... even with each other. Seemingly the same person(s) who are responsible for "advocating" for Cruz by way of sensationalizing a semi-nude photo of Melania Trump are also implicated in outing two of the women Cruz allegedly had affairs with.

Something else this proves is some of y'all who cry broke are are lying. I understand being a member of the U.S. Senate isn't all about the money (or at least it's not supposed to be). But with all the unscrupulous dealings that the public is only minimally aware of, I refuse to believe Cruz didn't have the ability to compensate a sex worker more for her time.

As for rates, there are so many factors at play. There are sex workers, at least in larger cities on the East and West Coasts as well as perhaps Chicago, who charge 1k for a couple or few hours and are seemingly doing just fine.

Anyhoo, since ethics have absolutely no bearing on who is deemed adequate to lead masses of people, Marco Rubio would have been my pick from the Republican pot because he is the sexiest...

I think this proves that Republicans play dirty... even with each other. Seemingly the same person(s) who are responsible for "advocating" for Cruz by way of sensationalizing a semi-nude photo of Melania Trump are also implicated in outing two of the women Cruz allegedly had affairs with.

Something else this proves is some of y'all who cry broke are are lying. I understand being a member of the U.S. Senate isn't all about the money (or at least it's not supposed to be). But with all the unscrupulous dealings that the public is only minimally aware of, I refuse to believe Cruz didn't have the ability to compensate a sex worker more for her time.

As for rates, there are so many factors at play. There are sex workers, at least in larger cities on the East and West Coasts as well as perhaps Chicago, who charge 1k for a couple or few hours and are seemingly doing just fine.

Anyhoo, since ethics have absolutely no bearing on who is deemed adequate to lead masses of people, Marco Rubio would have been my pick from the Republican pot because he is the sexiest... Originally Posted by Lena Duvall

Gotta get in a rub about Republicans. lol Ok did you hear about all the gun violence in Chicago. You know they have one of the tightest gun control laws in the nation. Democrats and their gun control. Isn't Obama a former Illinois politician? Doesn't Hillary support more gun control? Enough said. What a man can afford is irrevelant. What a man is willing to pay is the actual question.

Actually I find that those idiots actually make a true BFE date look more desirable by contrast. It is good something can make me look good--it certainly isn't my receding hairline. Originally Posted by Old-T

Even on your very worst day,(bad hair day, bad attitude, etc) you would be a treat for any lady to get to spend time with. Especially compared to what I imagine it would be like, to spend time with some of the less female friendly individuals one might encounter on this board.

I think this proves that Republicans play dirty... even with each other. Seemingly the same person(s) who are responsible for "advocating" for Cruz by way of sensationalizing a semi-nude photo of Melania Trump are also implicated in outing two of the women Cruz allegedly had affairs with.

Something else this proves is some of y'all who cry broke are are lying. I understand being a member of the U.S. Senate isn't all about the money (or at least it's not supposed to be). But with all the unscrupulous dealings that the public is only minimally aware of, I refuse to believe Cruz didn't have the ability to compensate a sex worker more for her time.

As for rates, there are so many factors at play. There are sex workers, at least in larger cities on the East and West Coasts as well as perhaps Chicago, who charge 1k for a couple or few hours and are seemingly doing just fine.

Anyhoo, since ethics have absolutely no bearing on who is deemed adequate to lead masses of people, Marco Rubio would have been my pick from the Republican pot because he is the sexiest... Originally Posted by Lena Duvall

I have no idea why they spend so much time, effort, and money digging up what they think we all believe is unacceptable behavior, rather than the norm for these yahoos. Seems to me, the money, time, and effort could be spent on something more meaningful and helpful to the people of the United States.

Who cares who is having sex with who, how often, or even if they pay for it? It's not like any of them took a chastity vow with their constituents, or we the people, are even of the opinion that people don't screw around on each other as often as they can and for every reason in the book. Some even have "agreements", but simply put on the goodie two shoe faces of marriage and devotion, in order to get votes. Stable family illusions and all that jazz. LOL Hey, not judging, just observant.

I agree....Sexy is as good as any other reason people might choose to vote or not to vote for a candidate, IMO.

Gotta get in a rub about Republicans..

^^^^^ I did not send for you.. and clearly my cheekiness flew over your head. The only rubbing I did this morning was rubbing one out after watching some stellar porn!

[
How would he know where to find a $1000 overnight.

I dont really see him screening with the type. Frankly I would think his people would keep him away from the type.....

Not a diss, its just well the circle doesnt get that small...

In an increasingly hollowed-out economy, most of us are working cheaper and cheaper (at least, in constant-dollar terms). Looks as if our sisters who do sex work are suffering with this noxious trend, too. Click here for the evidence. For those who don't elect to click through, it's a tabloid scandal story about how presidential candidate and U.S. Senator Ted Cruz is being accused of five mis-aimings of the "Cruz missile" at targets other than the one he's legally married to, including ... are you ready? ... a "$1,000 a night escort."

Day-ummmm! How'd he get an overnight for $1K? That's pretty low.

Yup, things are getting tough in the demimonde, if there's any truth to that. Originally Posted by James1588

I totally agree. I hope to live to see the day where our leaders are honest about the fact that their lives also reflect those of regular everyday people—blended families, non-monogamy, and *gasp* even hiring sex workers.

Consensual sexual actions that transpire between two or more grown ass people don't inherently affect people's decision making skills or leadership capabilities. In fact, if folks where less repressed and closeted, humanity would be so much better off.

Who cares who is having sex with who, how often, or even if they pay for it? It's not like any of them took a chastity vow with their constituents, or we the people, are even of the opinion that people don't screw around on each other as often as they can and for every reason in the book. Some even have "agreements", but simply put on the goodie two shoe faces of marriage and devotion, in order to get votes. Stable family illusions and all that jazz. LOL Hey, not judging, just observant.

I agree....Sexy is as good as any other reason people might choose to vote or not to vote for a candidate, IMO. Originally Posted by MaxiMilyen