For the edification of lantern

This is the Global Climate Change I was talking about.

Not the one out of many, many, many, many, many examples you claim define the subject.
You don't want it to be true so it isn't. You'll keep using those non-examples everytime you argue the point. Because if you haven't believed the evidence so far, then you never will. I would even accept an argument about the degree of change but not that it's a hoax.

I can't handle facts? I love facts. I prefer bad news to fake news. You know most studies that claim there is no warming are funded by fossil fuel companies, right?

I would add links about the studies but you won't look at the ones I've included.

https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
https://climate.nasa.gov/causes/
https://climate.nasa.gov/effects/
https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
https://climate.nasa.gov/faq/

Nice basket of nothing there munchie. Note you didn't debunk ONE FACT. Epic fail. Never said there was no warming, just the fact of Gore's statements and that the numbers were falsified based on THE "SCIENTiSTS" OWN E-MAILS. Reading comprehension is your friend. But if you can't understand that I'm not going to waste my time explaining it to you.

You asked me a question. You asked; "You mean that global warming HOAX where the scientists got caught red handed FALSIFYING data?"
I said; "This is the Global Climate Change I was talking about."
You already wasted your time by responding to a post I told you had nothing to do with your post.

Nice basket of nothing there munchie. Note you didn't debunk ONE FACT.If they are facts, how would I debunk them?
Epic fail. Never said there was no warming, No, you called it a hoax. That would be an epic fail. just the fact of Gore's statements and that the numbers were falsified based on THE "SCIENTiSTS" OWN E-MAILS. Reading comprehension is your friend. But if you can't understand that I'm not going to waste my time explaining it to you. Originally Posted by Lantern2814

Sorry bud. Doesn't calling global warming a hoax mean the same thing as there isn't any? If not, what does it mean?

You could have added the ages of all the kids your parents had that lived along with the fact Gore was wrong or that someone fudged some numbers and it still would be off-topic where you thought it was cute to put it in. None of that has anything to do with any of my posts.
Off topic, like I said.

You asked a question. I answered it. I said that you were talking about a different thing than I was. I pointed out global warming isn't a hoax like you incorrectly stated it was.

https://imgflip.com/i/1russ0

RTM'ng you munchie. Yet more personal insults. All you have. When you fudge the numbers, your entire premise is now FALSE. Guess that's too deep for you to understand. When you are already burying yourself, stop digging. Pointing out you not debunking ONE thing. By the way, you may want to remember the rules you like to lecture about. Then again Lexus got banned for calling your bullshit bullshit so who knows.....

https://imgflip.com/i/1russ0 Originally Posted by RetiredSubmariner

Anything listed under science that is about consensus is, by its nature, flawed.

Anything listed under science that is about consensus is, by its nature, flawed. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

I'm with you on this one, Barleycorn.

I think you have posted the most effective edification on this thread, though Lantern needed no edification.

A consensus based on a 2 question questionnaire is not a consensus.

1) Do you believe that the earth is warming?

2) Do you believe that mans activity plays any part of that warming?

That's the 98% "consensus" we keep hearing about.

I'm still waiting for beach front property ( gore said it was going to happen in 2014 ) oh well

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Thank you sir.

Then again Lexus got banned for calling your bullshit bullshit so who knows..... Originally Posted by Lantern2814

How do you know wtf LexusLover got banned for?

How do you know wtf LexusLover got banned for? Originally Posted by WTF

WTF is thinking...

Thank you sir. Originally Posted by RetiredSubmariner

you're very welcome.