Controversy over Natalie pics?

I do not read reviews, but I've had numerous calls alerting me that on the agency review page there are allegations that one of my escorts, Natalie, doesn't look anything like the pics of her on my site.

All the pics of her on my site were taken by myself, of Natalie, on August 5 in my incall in San Antonio. For those of you who are not familiar with my incalls, they are all furnished with antiques, as is the room in the pics.
These are unedited pics of the room in which the pics of Natalie are taken so anyone who's interested can see that they match the room in which Natalie appears.

I try to take pics of the girls whenever they will permit it. Natalie was more than willing to have pics taken, including her face, and suggested doing very explicit pics as well.

Hmm.. she seems a bit thin in these photos...

Is this one of those tricks?
Find the "providers" in this picture?
Circle and send in to win a prize?

I'm curious about Marina's pics, especially this one:
http://www.theaustinescorts.com/files/sxR87828.jpg

Can you confirm these are real? Note: I'm not accusing you of anything... just asking, as someone else suggested the pics were not an accurate representation of the lady in question.

I'm providing pics of the room so it can be seen that the room in which she is depicted in the pics on my site is the same room which I can take pics of, and therefore were not obtained elsewhere. Pics of the room with Natalie in it are on the site, and I'll include one of her here as well which I took before she tossed her clothes on the floor. I really don't know exactly what accusations are being made because I never read reviews, but the pics of Natalie are really her, as are others who will permit me to take pics. I always use the same rooms and comforters so it can be recognized.

As for Marina she will not permit me to take any pics, and I freely admit that the pics I use to portray her on my site or her BP ad are not actually of her. There is a clear statement on my site that I use substitutes with some of the girls. I've heard all those accusations before. They are usually made by the same people, and they are well aware of the statement on my site [although they like to pretend it's not there]. These repeated accusations are made in bad faith. So far though there have been no complaints made to me from real customers that she looks any different than the pics provided. I guarantee you if anyone claims otherwise in a review it's because they didn't really see her, or have the appointment they claim to have in the review. I have been plagued by false reviews, with wrong dates and such, since this board began. There's nothing I can do about it. Marina has more repeat biz of anyone I've ever worked with, and part of that might have to do with her extraordinary beauty. She's the only person I work with for whom I have a list of clients who ask me to call them whenever she's available. The way things are going though I might have to make such a list for Natalie too.

So Marina is not the same gal in her pics on your website? How about the following who do not have the same background pics you posted above in this thread? Are they real or like Marina's pics?

Staci - no dark paneled wall like the pics above
Alexis - no gray striped wall to the left of the bed like the pics above
Valaria - no pics with the background posted above
Kimmy - no vertical blinds in the background to the left of the bed like the pics above
Holly - no background at all like the pics above
Ananda - no vertical blinds in the background to the left of the bed like the pics above

I really don't know what accusations are being made because I never read reviews

Ok, you do have a sense of humor as that made me laugh.

Hmm.. she seems a bit thin in these photos... Originally Posted by cockforhire

Is this one of those tricks?
Find the "providers" in this picture?
Circle and send in to win a prize? Originally Posted by harkontume

KITTYLOVRATX: I see you have time to make a "study" [albeit a false one] of each and every pic of each girl on my site; to me that's funny, particularly since you have no interest in actually making an appointment with any of them.

I will leave it up to each individual who's interested, if any, to recognize the furnishings in the two different rooms which I used to take the pics of Ananda, Natalie, Staci, Kimmy, Ananda, Adrienne and others.

As for Marina she will not permit me to take any pics, and I freely admit that the pics I use to portray her on my site or her BP ad are not actually of her. There is a clear statement on my site that I use substitutes with some of the girls. Originally Posted by theaustinescorts

That doesn't sound like an entirely dishonest approach, assuming that the pics are a pretty close representation of a lady who does not wish to be photographed. On the other hand, I think a much better (eg - more honest) way to handle this is to have a notice on individual pages where fake/substitute pics are used, instead of a general 'catch-all' disclaimer, as now I really have no idea which ones are real and which ones aren't (except for the ones you mentioned in this thread). That makes me want to avoid your whole operation, which is really too bad because the girl portraying Marina on your site really looks quite yummy

I don't usually step on any toes on this site, mainly because I'm here for one true purpose. To meet my fantasy women, and enjoy private time with them. I could really care less about anyone else's drama here, and truly, there is plenty of it.

The fact that you feel the need to defend yourself speaks volumes with me. If you truly are conducting your business in a trustworthy way, why bother to defend? Why start entire threads to do so, titling them things like "Controversy over...etc etc...".

This quote from you:

I freely admit that the pics I use to portray her on my site or her BP ad are not actually of her.

Sums it up for me. One of many reason I do things on my own, do plenty of research, and stick with indies.

Although you and I will never meet, I which you prosperity in your endeavors.

KITTYLOVRATX: I see you have time to make a "study" [albeit a false one] of each and every pic of each girl on my site; to me that's funny, particularly since you have no interest in actually making an appointment with any of them.

I will leave it up to each individual who's interested, if any, to recognize the furnishings in the two different rooms which I used to take the pics of Ananda, Natalie, Staci, Kimmy, Ananda, Adrienne and others. Originally Posted by theaustinescorts

why would it be false? You made a claim that I addressed and now you two-stepped to claim its two different rooms. However, if you review the comments you will see that there has to be at least 4 different rooms questioned by the pictures. I'm just curious and doing some due diligence....your claims aren't holding water with me, but that's just me. I'm one potential consumer so I'm sure your market share is safe with or without me

So Marina is not the same gal in her pics on your website? How about the following who do not have the same background pics you posted above in this thread? Are they real or like Marina's pics?

Staci - no dark paneled wall like the pics above
Alexis - no gray striped wall to the left of the bed like the pics above
Valaria - no pics with the background posted above
Kimmy - no vertical blinds in the background to the left of the bed like the pics above
Holly - no background at all like the pics above
Ananda - no vertical blinds in the background to the left of the bed like the pics above Originally Posted by kittyloveratx

taking a look at the pics that kittylover has called into question:

Staci - that room appears to be the incall in Austin. i have been there. quite a few reviews also have referred to an incall in Austin, so we know it exists.
Alexis - bedspread doesn't look familiar. can't tell.
Valaria - i have no idea, but i think it would be rather easy to figure out that the girl in front of you isn't her...she is CUT!
Kimmy - bedspread looks like the incall in Austin.......
Holly - can't tell
Ananda - that room appears to be the incall in Austin. i have been there.

ok... I am a fairly smart guy, and I admit that I didn't read every word of the above posts. But, how does showing pics of the room where photos are taken prove that the photos are of a certain girl... all you are verifying is the room.... not the person.

LF

ok... I am a fairly smart guy, and I admit that I didn't read every word of the above posts. But, how does showing pics of the room where photos are taken prove that the photos are of a certain girl... all you are verifying is the room.... not the person.

LF Originally Posted by LadiesFan

good point, but i believe that the reason is that people are stating that the pics of some of the girls are photos taken from elsewhere (presumably from the internet) and used to represent what the girl looks like. so i guess the line of logic is that if the background is of the incall, then this at eliminates the "stock photos" off the internet. granted there is a possibility that some body double is being used, but doesn't that require the agency owner to hire two girls - one as a photo model and another as the actual talent? sounds like alot of production costs. just my two cents.

i have seen some of these girls, but not all. so i can't say definitively if all of the pics are the actual girl. if anyone wants to pony up the money for me to find out, im game!

Well, he's already clearly stated that the photos for one girl are not actually photos of her, while attempting to disprove allegations that he posted fake pics of another girl.

So, what is the actual point of this thread? A self alert?