The Fort Hood Massacre: Blame Bill Clinton For The Dead And Wounded

It was a 1993 Clinton administration gun-control directive banning most military personnel from carrying their arms for personal protection that facilitated Hasan's massacre.................


Among President Clinton’s first acts upon taking office in 1993 was to disarm U.S. soldiers on military bases. In March 1993, the Army imposed regulations forbidding military personnel from carrying their personal firearms and making it almost impossible for commanders to issue firearms to soldiers in the U.S. for personal protection.



Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...#ixzz2bJVqyVDJ
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
Straight from the horse's ass.



It was a 1993 Clinton administration gun-control directive banning most military personnel from carrying their arms for personal protection that facilitated Hasan's massacre.................


Among President Clinton’s first acts upon taking office in 1993 was to disarm U.S. soldiers on military bases. In March 1993, the Army imposed regulations forbidding military personnel from carrying their personal firearms and making it almost impossible for commanders to issue firearms to soldiers in the U.S. for personal protection.



Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...#ixzz2bJVqyVDJ
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter Originally Posted by Whirlaway
Attached Images File Type: png untitled.png (46.2 KB, 44 views)
How about taking a look at the years of fitness reports that Hasan's evaluators wrote? Past perspective is 20/20 and his Islamic radicalization is hard to miss from this vantage point, but his superiors had a ringside seat to this madness for years. What kept them from exposing his bestiality? Could it have been the traditional military aversion to sensible critique in fitness reports? It is widely known that anything less than 100% on a fitness report is grounds for discharge. But is there something more subtle going on? Could it be a perverse coddlng of political correctness among the men and women that we want to be unequivocal warriors and death dealers to our enemies?

To be sure the Clintons and the larger military command structure bear blame for this travesty, but isn't anybody responsible for anything? Shouldn't a bunch of officers get reprimanded, demoted, or discharged over this? 13 people are dead and nobody except this hapless fool is in the spotlight for wrongdoing.
How about taking a look at the years of fitness reports that Hasan's evaluators wrote? Past perspective is 20/20 and his Islamic radicalization is hard to miss from this vantage point, but his superiors had a ringside seat to this madness for years. What kept them from exposing his bestiality? Could it have been the traditional military aversion to sensible critique in fitness reports? It is widely known that anything less than 100% on a fitness report is grounds for discharge. But is there something more subtle going on? Could it be a perverse coddlng of political correctness among the men and women that we want to be unequivocal warriors and death dealers to our enemies?

To be sure the Clintons and the larger military command structure bear blame for this travesty, but isn't anybody responsible for anything? Shouldn't a bunch of officers get reprimanded, demoted, or discharged over this? 13 people are dead and nobody except this hapless fool is in the spotlight for wrongdoing. Originally Posted by trident60
Setting aside the Monday morning quarterbacking you're doing, I suspect his position as a physician probably played some role. They're not subject to the same rules as other officers in the military for a bunch of reasons, with the main one being that it is difficult for the military to hold on to them. Physician retention rates in the military are quite low for a lot of reasons. Deployments, low pay, and lucrative civilian careers await after the enlistment is up. Not saying that is why this guy wasn't subject to more scrutiny but it is certainly a possibility.
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 08-07-2013, 03:46 PM



ITS CLINTONS FAULT !



ITS CLINTONS FAULT ! Originally Posted by CJ7
Yeah, can you imagine the onslaught of old Clinton stories and scandals that will be posted here once the 2016 campaign heats up? Whirlytard's head will explode with the overload of material.
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 08-07-2013, 04:34 PM
Yeah, can you imagine the onslaught of old Clinton stories and scandals that will be posted here once the 2016 campaign heats up? Whirlytard's head will explode with the overload of material. Originally Posted by timpage

suuuuuuuure hope he doesn't have a stroke that hampers his ability to type
Just wondering what carrying a pistol would do for all of the male on female rapings that are happening on the US military bases.
JCM800's Avatar
Just wondering what carrying a pistol would do for all of the male on female rapings that are happening on the US military bases. Originally Posted by gnadfly
that would depend on if it’s a "legitimate rape"
Just wondering what carrying a pistol would do for all of the male on female rapings that are happening on the US military bases. Originally Posted by gnadfly
Some neutered troopers?