I am not sure yet.Essentially from what I understand, whistle-blower laws are meant to protect people from specifically those types of agreements employers make them sign if they report on employers doing illegal activities.
I work in IT and we all sign an agreement stating that all information that we administer is "privately owned and not to be revealed under threat of prosecution".
If everyone who worked in a top security position revealed what they saw, we would probably go into our houses and hide or go up into the mountains and hide. Originally Posted by DarthMaul
Essentially from what I understand, whistle-blower laws are meant to protect people from specifically those types of agreements employers make them sign if they report on employers doing illegal activities.What illegal activity did his employer commit? If you mean tracking a phone call then telecommunications have been doing that from day one.
Regardless of legal protection under the law though, your career is ruined the second you blow the whistle on any corporation. No one is ever going to hire you again. Originally Posted by jbravo_123
What illegal activity did his employer commit? If you mean tracking a phone call then telecommunications have been doing that from day one.That's the rub, isn't it? (which is why I voted I'm not sure yet)
I'm surprised that anyone is surprised that this data is collected. Originally Posted by Dorian Gray
Again... I'm typing this slowly. W-h-a-t l-a-w w-a-s b-r-o-k-e-n? Originally Posted by Dorian GrayPRISM is probably entirely lawful. So was the Stamp Act. So was sending American citizens of Jap ancestry to concentration camps during WWII. The Wansee Protocol was 100% legal under German law.