The Liberal Victory over Conservatism is Almost Complete

It now appears that the liberal conquest of America is all over except for the shouting. Thanks to liberal policies in this country, and no one could credibly argue that the liberals have not completely transformed America, we are about to be overtaken by China as the world's largest economy. The only way we can defeat them now would be to export all of our liberal programs that drag us down.

http://www.theguardian.com/business/...argest-economy

its easier to bitch about the liberals and blame it on them than it is to do something about it isn't it?

It now appears that the liberal conquest of America is all over except for the shouting. Thanks to liberal policies in this country, and no one could credibly argue that the liberals have not completely transformed America, we are about to be overtaken by China as the world's largest economy. The only way we can defeat them now would be to export all of our liberal programs that drag us down.

http://www.theguardian.com/business/...argest-economy Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer

You love it when it appears that America is losing.
Talk about believing anything.
Fresh research by the International Comparison Program (ICP), coordinated by the World Bank, considered the real cost of living and purchasing power in countries around the world as the best way of comparing the size of different economies.
Using this measure, the ICP concluded that the size of the Chinese economy in 2011 was 87% of the US economy, up from 43% in 2005 when the last comparison was made.
The chinese live on less than 10% a day what we do.


The report found that although high income countries account for half of the world's GDP, they are home to only about 17% of the world's population.
Wrong. In 2008, the current top 3 economies (belonging to China, the U.S., and India) had over 40% of the world’s population (Wiki using US Census bureau data). China (1.333 billion), India (1.14 billion), and the U.S (304 million) total 2.737 billion out of 6.688 billion (40.9%) but only 38.% of world GDP.
World population is growing at 1.2% as of 2011

its easier to bitch about the liberals and blame it on them than it is to do something about it isn't it? Originally Posted by CJ7

I don't accept the proposition that I should have to clean up your mess. You guys fucked it up, you should have to sacrifice to fix it.

JL doesn't live in the same reality as most folks. He dreams about sucking dick at Love Field.

I don't accept the proposition that I should have to clean up your mess. You guys fucked it up, you should have to sacrifice to fix it. Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer

Oh? And you did nothing to stop it, did you? You're as culpable as anybody, Kayla... And what did you do? YOU RAN AWAY ... that is until your wife beat your ass into coming home to Neimann's. What a puto!

I'm figuring you won't be there at Love Field Monday when I fly through, will you? I'm bringing my ass. Will you be bringing your bare fists to kick it with?

Naww... but if you want to send any of your dopplegangers, like Don't Be Daft, I'll gladly buy him a beer. But Uncle Han can kiss my "REAL" Kosher ass!

Fresh research by the International Comparison Program (ICP), coordinated by the World Bank, considered the real cost of living and purchasing power in countries around the world as the best way of comparing the size of different economies.
Using this measure, the ICP concluded that the size of the Chinese economy in 2011 was 87% of the US economy, up from 43% in 2005 when the last comparison was made.
The chinese live on less than 10% a day what we do.

The report found that although high income countries account for half of the world's GDP, they are home to only about 17% of the world's population.
Wrong. In 2008, the current top 3 economies (belonging to China, the U.S., and India) had over 40% of the world’s population (Wiki using US Census bureau data). China (1.333 billion), India (1.14 billion), and the U.S (304 million) total 2.737 billion out of 6.688 billion (40.9%) but only 38.% of world GDP.
World population is growing at 1.2% as of 2011 Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

OK, you are mixing together different statistics when you said "Wrong".

The first statistic was that HIGH-INCOME countriis account of half of GDP, but only 17% of population. "High income" means the income of the average person in those countries. So, the US, England, Germany, etc., are high income countries.

But the second statistic wasn't "high income". It was "TOP ECONOMIES", which refers to the total GDP of ALL the people in each country. So, even though China is a low income per person country, they have SO many people that, collectively, they add up to a larger economy.

So BOTH statistics can be true.

It is entirely possible that high incomes countries (i.e., US, GB, Germany, France, etc.) may have half the GDP, but only 17% of the population, while a different group of countries (the US, China, and India) have 40% of the GDP and 38% of the population.

I don't accept the proposition that I should have to clean up your mess. You guys fucked it up, you should have to sacrifice to fix it. Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer

Banned, huh?

Looks like YOUR mess has been cleaned up.

Banned? What is that about?