Ex-az AG sat on evidence/records refuting 2020 election fraud

And the list of trumpy election lies and cover ups continues to grow.
https://apnews.com/article/arizona-s...234d5397cc8839

"PHOENIX (AP) — Arizona’s former attorney general suppressed findings by his investigators who concluded there was no basis for allegations that the 2020 election was marred by widespread fraud, according to documents released Wednesday by his successor.

Democratic Attorney General Kris Mayes, who took office last month, said the records show the 2020 election “was conducted fairly and accurately by election officials.”

Previous Attorney General Mark Brnovich, a Republican, never released a March 2022 summary of investigative findings, which ruled out most of the fraud claims spread by allies and supporters of former President Donald Trump. Yet a month later, he released an “interim report” that claimed his investigation “revealed serious vulnerabilities that must be addressed and raises questions about the 2020 election in Arizona.”

He released his April report despite pushback from his investigators who said some of its claims were refuted by their probe. Brnovich was at the time in the midst of a Republican Party primary for U.S. Senate and facing fierce criticism from Trump, who claimed he wasn’t doing enough to prosecute election fraud."


Is there no low they won't delve in their attempts at stealing the 2020 election?
Did you notice the crickets?
Why do they pretend they don't know about this?

More proof they project themselves on the people of America.

They are the party of mike flynn.

Mike Flynn the military hero who got framed and railroaded by the DNC? That Mike Flynn?

0FF TOPIC. The lying guy from AZ is the topic. The lying mike flynn is a POS and just a example.
No. The mike flynn who lied numerous times to the FBI when he was on team trump. He was fired for lying to Pence.


Are we going to have to reorient each one of these people when they come back from BANNED CAMP? Let's just assume they're still lying. Let's assume they're just the missing links.

Mike Flynn the military hero who got framed and railroaded by the DNC? That Mike Flynn? No such person Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

0FF TOPIC. The lying guy from AZ is the topic. The lying mike flynn is a POS and just a example... Originally Posted by Tigbitties38

Lemme see if I got this right. The OP goes off topic in the original post and calls someone out on following up on words (topic) contained in the OP. I'm not well enough versed in the rules of the fora here, but I think the OP has the responsibility to RTM the OP for going off topic in the original OP.

Do the right thing

0FF TOPIC. The lying guy from AZ is the topic. The lying mike flynn is a POS and just a example.
No. The mike flynn who lied numerous times to the FBI when he was on team trump. He was fired for lying to Pence.


Are we going to have to reorient each one of these people when they come back from BANNED CAMP? Let's just assume they're still lying. Let's assume they're just the missing links. Originally Posted by Tigbitties38

You introduced him into the conversation. Sit still and take your medicine.

To get back on topic, you're talking about proving a negative...not much of an argument.

Are you guys thick or what. The topic is the former AG of AZ concealed evidence that disproved election fraud. I used flynn as an example of another party member who lied about the election results. Then barley boy tries to rewrite history. Flynn pled guilty to lying to the FBI about lying about talking to the Russians about sanctions. Yes, the name mike flynn is mentioned. No he is not the topic. He is a convicted felon who was pardoned by trump. He may have done some heroic things in the past but certainly not in the last few years.
If you want to talk about flynn, start your own thread.

The topic is clear to any reasonably intelligent person.
And of course you have nothing on topic to say. The ex-AG concealed evidence that proved there was no election fraud. Read the link.
I didn't ask you to prove a negative. Your claims of election fraud are the perfect example of your/ trumpys ongoing election denial.
Since the polls closed for the 2020 election, trumpys have demanded proof the election wasn't stolen. So far you haven't made any on topic remarks. Because you can't understand written English. My "medicine" I'm taking is trying to explain something to people incapable of understanding simple comments.

You have it completely wrong. As usual.
We'll let the mods sort it out.

Lemme see if I got this right. The OP goes off topic in the original post and calls someone out on following up on words (topic) Most posts contain words. Every word in a post isn't part of the topic.
And you're right. You aren't well versed in any aspect of writing skills, composition of an idea, or other skills needed to be relevant in a discussion like this.contained in the OP. I'm not well enough versed in the rules of the fora here, but I think the OP has the responsibility to RTM the OP for going off topic in the original OP.

Do the right thing Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

You have it completely wrong. As usual.
We'll let the mods sort it out.
Originally Posted by Tigbitties38

Of course. When you put out info, they can't counter it with same so they put out bull. This causes the narrative below which they want everyone to see except the truth.

This just really goes to prove that “election deniers” and “election fraud promoters” actually fit into two categories.

1. Those lying about it but aerially know better.
2. Those who are plain stupid enough to actually believe it and are too stupid to wise up and ignore all evidence to the contrary so they can continue with their belief.

That’s all of them. There’s no in between. So those that keep claiming all the election fraud just need to ask themselves which of those two categories they fit into.