Bill Gates says we need a nationwide shutdown for at least 10 more weeks to fight coronavirus: 'The window for making important decisions hasn't closed'
https://news.yahoo.com/bill-gates-sa...sf_akfmevaatca
- dilbert firestorm
- 04-04-2020, 03:00 PM
- friendly fred
- 04-04-2020, 03:02 PM
Fuck Bill Gates!
That motherfucker can work in extreme luxury from home and not worry about paying the bills. Stupid, out of touch asshole!
Plus, we can quarantine the old and sick and wear masks (properly) and work like real men, not a bunch of pussies!
That motherfucker can work in extreme luxury from home and not worry about paying the bills. Stupid, out of touch asshole!
Plus, we can quarantine the old and sick and wear masks (properly) and work like real men, not a bunch of pussies!
- dilbert firestorm
- 04-04-2020, 03:08 PM
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...inkId=85684285
Bill Gates: Here’s how to make up for lost time on covid-19
By Bill Gates
March 31, 2020 at 6:26 p.m. CDT
Bill Gates is co-founder of Microsoft and a co-chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
There’s no question the United States missed the opportunity to get ahead of the novel coronavirus. But the window for making important decisions hasn’t closed. The choices we and our leaders make now will have an enormous impact on how soon case numbers start to go down, how long the economy remains shut down and how many Americans will have to bury a loved one because of covid-19.
Through my work with the Gates Foundation, I’ve spoken with experts and leaders in Washington and across the country. It’s become clear to me that we must take three steps.
First, we need a consistent nationwide approach to shutting down. Despite urging from public health experts, some states and counties haven’t shut down completely. In some states, beaches are still open; in others, restaurants still serve sit-down meals.
This is a recipe for disaster. Because people can travel freely across state lines, so can the virus. The country’s leaders need to be clear: Shutdown anywhere means shutdown everywhere. Until the case numbers start to go down across America — which could take 10 weeks or more — no one can continue business as usual or relax the shutdown. Any confusion about this point will only extend the economic pain, raise the odds that the virus will return, and cause more deaths.
Second, the federal government needs to step up on testing. Far more tests should be made available. We should also aggregate the results so we can quickly identify potential volunteers for clinical trials and know with confidence when it’s time to return to normal. There are good examples to follow: New York state recently expanded its capacity to up to more than 20,000 tests per day.
There’s also been some progress on more efficient testing methods, such as the self-swab developed by the Seattle Coronavirus Assessment Network, which allows patients to take a sample themselves without possibly exposing a health worker. I hope this and other innovations in testing are scaled up across the country soon.
Even so, demand for tests will probably exceed the supply for some time, and right now, there’s little rhyme or reason to who gets the few that are available. As a result, we don’t have a good handle on how many cases there are or where the virus is likely headed next, and it will be hard to know if it rebounds later. And because of the backlog of samples, it can take seven days for results to arrive when we need them within 24 hours.
This is why the country needs clear priorities for who is tested. First on the list should be people in essential roles such as health-care workers and first responders, followed by highly symptomatic people who are most at risk of becoming seriously ill and those who are likely to have been exposed.
The same goes for masks and ventilators. Forcing 50 governors to compete for lifesaving equipment — and hospitals to pay exorbitant prices for it — only makes matters worse.
Finally, we need a data-based approach to developing treatments and a vaccine. Scientists are working full speed on both; in the meantime, leaders can help by not stoking rumors or panic buying. Long before the drug hydroxychloroquine was approved as an emergency treatment for covid-19, people started hoarding it, making it hard to find for lupus patients who need it to survive.
We should stick with the process that works: Run rapid trials involving various candidates and inform the public when the results are in. Once we have a safe and effective treatment, we’ll need to ensure that the first doses go to the people who need them most.
To bring the disease to an end, we’ll need a safe and effective vaccine. If we do everything right, we could have one in less than 18 months — about the fastest a vaccine has ever been developed. But creating a vaccine is only half the battle. To protect Americans and people around the world, we’ll need to manufacture billions of doses. (Without a vaccine, developing countries are at even greater risk than wealthy ones, because it’s even harder for them to do physical distancing and shutdowns.)
We can start now by building the facilities where these vaccines will be made. Because many of the top candidates are made using unique equipment, we’ll have to build facilities for each of them, knowing that some won’t get used. Private companies can’t take that kind of risk, but the federal government can. It’s a great sign that the administration made deals this week with at least two companies to prepare for vaccine manufacturing. I hope more deals will follow.
In 2015, I urged world leaders in a TED talk to prepare for a pandemic the same way they prepare for war — by running simulations to find the cracks in the system. As we’ve seen this year, we have a long way to go. But I still believe that if we make the right decisions now, informed by science, data and the experience of medical professionals, we can save lives and get the country back to work.
Bill Gates: Here’s how to make up for lost time on covid-19
By Bill Gates
March 31, 2020 at 6:26 p.m. CDT
Bill Gates is co-founder of Microsoft and a co-chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
There’s no question the United States missed the opportunity to get ahead of the novel coronavirus. But the window for making important decisions hasn’t closed. The choices we and our leaders make now will have an enormous impact on how soon case numbers start to go down, how long the economy remains shut down and how many Americans will have to bury a loved one because of covid-19.
Through my work with the Gates Foundation, I’ve spoken with experts and leaders in Washington and across the country. It’s become clear to me that we must take three steps.
First, we need a consistent nationwide approach to shutting down. Despite urging from public health experts, some states and counties haven’t shut down completely. In some states, beaches are still open; in others, restaurants still serve sit-down meals.
This is a recipe for disaster. Because people can travel freely across state lines, so can the virus. The country’s leaders need to be clear: Shutdown anywhere means shutdown everywhere. Until the case numbers start to go down across America — which could take 10 weeks or more — no one can continue business as usual or relax the shutdown. Any confusion about this point will only extend the economic pain, raise the odds that the virus will return, and cause more deaths.
Second, the federal government needs to step up on testing. Far more tests should be made available. We should also aggregate the results so we can quickly identify potential volunteers for clinical trials and know with confidence when it’s time to return to normal. There are good examples to follow: New York state recently expanded its capacity to up to more than 20,000 tests per day.
There’s also been some progress on more efficient testing methods, such as the self-swab developed by the Seattle Coronavirus Assessment Network, which allows patients to take a sample themselves without possibly exposing a health worker. I hope this and other innovations in testing are scaled up across the country soon.
Even so, demand for tests will probably exceed the supply for some time, and right now, there’s little rhyme or reason to who gets the few that are available. As a result, we don’t have a good handle on how many cases there are or where the virus is likely headed next, and it will be hard to know if it rebounds later. And because of the backlog of samples, it can take seven days for results to arrive when we need them within 24 hours.
This is why the country needs clear priorities for who is tested. First on the list should be people in essential roles such as health-care workers and first responders, followed by highly symptomatic people who are most at risk of becoming seriously ill and those who are likely to have been exposed.
The same goes for masks and ventilators. Forcing 50 governors to compete for lifesaving equipment — and hospitals to pay exorbitant prices for it — only makes matters worse.
Finally, we need a data-based approach to developing treatments and a vaccine. Scientists are working full speed on both; in the meantime, leaders can help by not stoking rumors or panic buying. Long before the drug hydroxychloroquine was approved as an emergency treatment for covid-19, people started hoarding it, making it hard to find for lupus patients who need it to survive.
We should stick with the process that works: Run rapid trials involving various candidates and inform the public when the results are in. Once we have a safe and effective treatment, we’ll need to ensure that the first doses go to the people who need them most.
To bring the disease to an end, we’ll need a safe and effective vaccine. If we do everything right, we could have one in less than 18 months — about the fastest a vaccine has ever been developed. But creating a vaccine is only half the battle. To protect Americans and people around the world, we’ll need to manufacture billions of doses. (Without a vaccine, developing countries are at even greater risk than wealthy ones, because it’s even harder for them to do physical distancing and shutdowns.)
We can start now by building the facilities where these vaccines will be made. Because many of the top candidates are made using unique equipment, we’ll have to build facilities for each of them, knowing that some won’t get used. Private companies can’t take that kind of risk, but the federal government can. It’s a great sign that the administration made deals this week with at least two companies to prepare for vaccine manufacturing. I hope more deals will follow.
In 2015, I urged world leaders in a TED talk to prepare for a pandemic the same way they prepare for war — by running simulations to find the cracks in the system. As we’ve seen this year, we have a long way to go. But I still believe that if we make the right decisions now, informed by science, data and the experience of medical professionals, we can save lives and get the country back to work.
- Levianon17
- 04-04-2020, 03:15 PM
Bill Gates says we need a nationwide shutdown for at least 10 more weeks to fight coronavirus: 'The window for making important decisions hasn't closed'Hell, I thought Bill Gates was a Tech Guy not a man of Science. He needs to get back on his corner.
https://news.yahoo.com/bill-gates-sa...sf_akfmevaatca Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm
- friendly fred
- 04-04-2020, 03:18 PM
- dilbert firestorm
- 04-04-2020, 04:05 PM
- Jacuzzme
- 04-04-2020, 04:14 PM
Maybe he wants to start writing checks to all the people his idiocy will bankrupt. Go fuck yourself with your stolen OS, Bill.
- eccielover
- 04-04-2020, 04:14 PM
- friendly fred
- 04-04-2020, 05:42 PM
- gnadfly
- 04-04-2020, 06:14 PM
So what's going to happen 10 weeks from now after we "totally shut down" and more new CV cases and CV deaths occur? Are we going to shut down for another 4-6 months?
The economy is already in shambles. Just wait until the end of April. Shit is starting to get real. More quarantines. More prisoner releases. People lining up at Walmart.
The economy is already in shambles. Just wait until the end of April. Shit is starting to get real. More quarantines. More prisoner releases. People lining up at Walmart.
- Chung Tran
- 04-04-2020, 07:05 PM
So what's going to happen 10 weeks from now after we "totally shut down" and more new CV cases and CV deaths occur? Are we going to shut down for another 4-6 months?if people would take it seriously, end of April is a fair end point.. but many are not, still.. my workplace is arguably "essential", but I have to carry a letter from "legal" in case LE believes otherwise. and people still crowd around, ignoring the 6 foot rule, when in fact, it is easy to carry out if people were not careless. we are way behind what we should have been doing a month or 6 weeks ago.
The economy is already in shambles. Just wait until the end of April. Shit is starting to get real. More quarantines. More prisoner releases. People lining up at Walmart. Originally Posted by gnadfly
- friendly fred
- 04-04-2020, 08:11 PM
So what's going to happen 10 weeks from now after we "totally shut down" and more new CV cases and CV deaths occur? Are we going to shut down for another 4-6 months?Bill Gates couldn't care less - he just wants to strut around and show everyone how morally superior he is and how smart he is.
The economy is already in shambles. Just wait until the end of April. Shit is starting to get real. More quarantines. More prisoner releases. People lining up at Walmart. Originally Posted by gnadfly
In the meantime, we are fucking up the economy and with that, fuckers are going to get depressed they can't earn money for their families and snap.
We need to quarantine the old timers and the sick, and put everyone else back in business.
- Chung Tran
- 04-04-2020, 08:40 PM
I'm on board with this idea, IF we haven't made significant "progress" by the end of this month.
We need to quarantine the old timers and the sick, and put everyone else back in business. Originally Posted by friendly fred
but practically speaking, how can it be done?
I'm listening.. who decides who is "old", who decides who is "sick"?
- HoeHummer
- 04-04-2020, 08:45 PM
- friendly fred
- 04-05-2020, 07:42 AM
I'm on board with this idea, IF we haven't made significant "progress" by the end of this month.I would look at the chart showing the outcomes of the old and those with underlying medical problems,and start from there.
but practically speaking, how can it be done?
I'm listening.. who decides who is "old", who decides who is "sick"? Originally Posted by Chung Tran
If a motherfucker is older than 70 and is fat, he likely fits the profile. That poor old bastard is probably looking at a 20% mortality rate if he catches COVID-19.
If an oldtimer like me who takes no medication, can show a clean blood panel with no disease, all my numbers are considered healthy, no temperature, height and weight proportionate - fuck I'm not just ambulatory but I can jog at a decent rate -then I get the green QR code on my phone and get to tell everyone to fuckoff who doesn't like it!