Rasmussen’s Top Pollster Predicts a Trump Landslide

baahahahaaaaaa

Rasmussen’s Top Pollster Predicts a Trump Landslide

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/saraha...slide-n2647179


With just two days until one of the most critical elections in U.S. history, Americans are holding their breath, wondering if the next POTUS will bring change or destroy the country further.


The presidential race has been close for the most part, with Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump going neck-and-neck throughout the entire campaign season. However, just days before votes begin to be calculated, a new poll shows Trump winning in a landslide.


Rasmussen’s head pollster made a striking prediction about the winner of the 2024 election.


Mark Mitchell suggested that Trump will take a significant lead nationally and among critical battleground states, positioning him to win in a landslide.


“What you’re hearing out there is that the polls are close, and I think that’s wrong,” he told Breitbart News. “I think the polls, on average, show a strong Trump win, and my polls taken independently show that as well.”


Mitchell predicted a significant Trump landslide victory that would mirror Ronald Reagan’s historic win against Jimmy Carter in 1980. He also pointed out that most people “don’t care who Kamala Harris is.”


The pollster credited a “major political realignment” as his reasoning, pointing to Trump’s ability to outperform in the polls. Mitchell seemed sure that the former president wouldn’t suddenly lose his momentum in the polls this close to Election Day and predicted that Trump would shift to the right of the polls in many if not all, swing states.


“I think the pollsters are having a hard time keeping up with that, us included. Party [affiliation] means a lot less than whether you support Trump or Harris,” Mitchell said, adding that people care about the Biden Administration but pointed out that it has been “deeply unpopular.”


Mitchell dismissed several polls that show Harris in the lead. He suggested that Trump’s performance has improved since 2020 and other election cycles, saying he is “locked in at a Trump plus two national popular votes.”


As a result, if Trump outperforms his previous national vote and in the battleground states, “that means Trump sweeps the swing states—a big win.”

I like it, feeling pumped!

... Crikey! ... Won't be long now...

#### Salty

I tend to go with what unbiased, objective and academic people believe and not what some biased right wing pollster reports to appease his viewers. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...4/75988080007/

Regardless, we will find out who is right soon enough so that's all I will post about that.

I tend to go with what unbiased, objective and academic people believe and not what some biased right wing pollster reports to appease his viewers. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...4/75988080007/

Regardless, we will find out who is right soon enough so that's all I will post about that. Originally Posted by Lucas McCain

there's nothing "biased" about Rasmussen and Lichtman will be wrong. for the second time.

Here’s how you know it’s bullshit.

Mitchell predicted a significant Trump landslide victory that would mirror Ronald Reagan’s historic win against Jimmy Carter in 1980. He also pointed out that most people “don’t care who Kamala Harris is.”

Anyone want to bet on that?

... We'll see IF it's bullshit very soon, mate.
Then we'll know...
Though Democrat pundit Nate Silver surely don't think the
election will be close either. ... Just sayin' ...

#### Salty

Here’s how you know it’s bullshit.

Mitchell predicted a significant Trump landslide victory that would mirror Ronald Reagan’s historic win against Jimmy Carter in 1980. He also pointed out that most people “don’t care who Kamala Harris is.”

Anyone want to bet on that? Originally Posted by txdot-guy

if Rasmussen called it for Harris what would your reply be?

yeah .. we know.

Here’s how you know it’s bullshit.

Mitchell predicted a significant Trump landslide victory that would mirror Ronald Reagan’s historic win against Jimmy Carter in 1980. He also pointed out that most people “don’t care who Kamala Harris is.”

Anyone want to bet on that? Originally Posted by txdot-guy

if Rasmussen called it for Harris what would your reply be?

yeah .. we know. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Don’t get me wrong, Ol’ Schitzenpants could still win the election. But there is no way that he will sweep the electoral college like Reagan did.

That’s why it’s bullshit.

Don’t get me wrong, Ol’ Schitzenpants could still win the election. But there is no way that he will sweep the electoral college like Reagan did.

That’s why it’s bullshit. Originally Posted by txdot-guy

... Reckon that's fair enough, mate. ... We'll See! ...

### Salty

Don’t get me wrong, Ol’ Schitzenpants could still win the election. But there is no way that he will sweep the electoral college like Reagan did.

That’s why it’s bullshit. Originally Posted by txdot-guy

he won't but he doesn't have to.

that's not what Rasmussen predicts. no one will ever win 525 of 538 electoral college votes again. EVER.

only Ronnie "Make America Great Again" Reagan could do that

312 will do.

As a result, if Trump outperforms his previous national vote and in the battleground states, “that means Trump sweeps the swing states—a big win.” Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

@Waco, you did not like what you posted about the Silver Bullitin in the other thread? I believe they had 257 for Harris and 262 for Trump and Penn was undecided. Whoever wins Penn would win the electoral college was their opinion. This was not good enough for you?

I think your post on the Silver Bullitin is a better post than the Rasmussen one. Ha Ha.

Phil Silvers 538 and Real Clear Politics latest polls say the same thing, whoever wins Penn will probably win the electoral college. If Harris were to win North Carolina, Arizona and Iowa then she would not need to win Penn to get to 270. There has been some talk about Harris winning Iowa. So, we'll see in two days.

Did Rasmussen predict the 2020 election correctly? Real Clear Politics got 48 out of 50 states correct for the 2020 election.

I tend to go with what unbiased, objective and academic people believe and not what some biased right wing pollster reports to appease his viewers. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...4/75988080007/

Regardless, we will find out who is right soon enough so that's all I will post about that. Originally Posted by Lucas McCain

+1


Good post about Professor Lichtman. Let's hope Lichtman goes 10 for 11 and Harris wins the Electoral College.

@Waco, you did not like what you posted about the Silver Bullitin in the other thread? I believe they had 257 for Harris and 262 for Trump and Penn was undecided. Whoever wins Penn would win the electoral college was their opinion. This was not good enough for you?

I think your post on the Silver Bullitin is a better post than the Rasmussen one. Ha Ha.

Phil Silvers 538 and Real Clear Politics latest polls say the same thing, whoever wins Penn will probably win the electoral college. If Harris were to win North Carolina, Arizona and Iowa then she would not need to win Penn to get to 270. There has been some talk about Harris winning Iowa. So, we'll see in two days.

Did Rasmussen predict the 2020 election correctly? Real Clear Politics got 48 out of 50 states correct for the 2020 election. Originally Posted by adav8s28

@Waco, the link to your post.

https://eccie.net/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=1063619950

I tend to go with what unbiased, objective and academic people believe and not what some biased right wing pollster reports to appease his viewers. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...4/75988080007/

Regardless, we will find out who is right soon enough so that's all I will post about that. Originally Posted by Lucas McCain

I am right there with those thoughts. While I do lean the other way in what I would like to see happen, There are polls that show about whatever one would wish to happen.

So much do, that I have a hard time evaluating any of them.

And now, we all will just have to wait untill tomorrow.