New Eccie policy on posting of pics/images/videos

Folks - wanted to update you on the new Eccie guidelines for the posting of pics/images/videos.

1. Members [ clients & providers ] may no longer post images & videos depicting them engaged in sex acts, period. (Generic images that they found on the internet are fine. ex. they can post a pic of a hot porn star giving a blow job. That's fine. The line is drawn where it's them engaged in a sex act....OR a provider engaged in a sex act.)

2. Members may NOT post nude or partial-nude images of any NON-Verified Provider unless it's a picture that they pulled off the internet. (like a back page ad pic or something like that)
(Ex. if a guy sees a girl in a spa or from back page and she's not a VP here, he is welcome to post a fully-clothed pic of her that he took. No nudity whatsoever.....otherwise it can only be a pic that's also available elsewhere on the internet, like her website, studio or spa website, another advertising venue like back page, etc)

3. As this is a new guideline - it will be updated accordingly & periodically.

As always - we thank you for your co-operation and understanding .
john_deere's Avatar
makes perfect sense. what about people posting links to photos and videos stored offsite?
DocHolyday's Avatar
It don't matter where they are stored. If the pics/vids depict engaging in a sex act , they are forbiden. Unsure of how violations will shake out with points or being banned. Delimex or one of the other Mods. may have more intel on that aspect.
makes perfect sense. what about people posting links to photos and videos stored offsite? Originally Posted by john_deere
Hi JD - As said - " Members [ clients & providers ] may no longer post images & videos depicting them engaged in " Depicting them/themselves - is the key word here. So, yes even if they are stored offsite- it's still not allowed. Hope this clarifies your query. Thanks !
CryptKicker's Avatar
It don't matter where they are stored. If the pics/vids depict engaging in a sex act , they are forbiden. Unsure of how violations will shake out with points or being banned. Delimex or one of the other Mods. may have more intel on that aspect. Originally Posted by DocHolyday

Things take some time to get used to. So in the beginning pics will mostly just be pulled and a reminder sent to the poster. But repeat offenders could receive warnings/points as the case may be.

Folks this is a move to keep the site safe for you mongers to hobby. We cannot risk underage ladies to be involved on ECCIE in any capacity and there have been some issues recently. You want this site to stay up so chill about it.
DocHolyday's Avatar
Things take some time to get used to. So in the beginning pics will mostly just be pulled and a reminder sent to the poster. But repeat offenders could receive warnings/points as the case may be.

Folks this is a move to keep the site safe for you mongers to hobby. We cannot risk underage ladies to be involved on ECCIE in any capacity and there have been some issues recently. You want this site to stay up so chill about it. Originally Posted by CryptKicker
Thanks for this ^^^^ Intel. CK. You & Delimex keep up the fine job!
hutch411's Avatar
How come other areas have not posted this same message yet?
CryptKicker's Avatar
We are not on the board 24/7. I'm sure it will be. It is a board wide policy.
hutch411's Avatar
Just surprised DFW hadn't been given the news yet, seeing as they are the biggest culprit.
DocHolyday's Avatar
How come other areas have not posted this same message yet? Originally Posted by hutch411
FYI Hutch, the new Guidline is now posted in the Co-Ed Forum on the SA Board.

West TX is not being singled out, its just the West TX Mods are leading the way on the new Guideline but I expect nothing less from the West TX Mods.! Believe me about that because Ol' Doc is everywhere on this site and knows good from bad to non-existent Mods. Like Texas has the best roads in this country, West TX has the best Mods. on this website!! (Admin. please take note!!)
Twain's Avatar
  • Twain
  • 04-03-2017, 09:36 AM
Does my rendition of a very specific act count?

I was going to use this very accurate drawing in a review today...

hutch411's Avatar
That a TS review? or fantasy strap on play?
john_deere's Avatar
thanks ck and deli for clarification from an actual mod. i figured this was the answer but i also know people will find all kinds of loopholes and "but all i did was link to it , bro!!!" will certainly be one of them.
Twain, I just chocked on my dr. Pepper
hutch411's Avatar
Just realized those are arms and not shoulder length hair on the stick figure. Sorry for the TS reference then. It just made me think you were taking it in the butt from a tranny, though that may say more about me than you.