Akin scandal hands Missouri to Obama

Maybe Obama should just let the Republicans defeat themselves. He really doesn't have to campaign much at all.

http://washingtonexaminer.com/akin-s...8#.UDfoataPV8G

I am actually surprised Akin is not from Kansas.

Missouri is the show me state.Kansas has sun flowers sunshine and sons of bitches.

Missouri is the show me state.Kansas has sun flowers sunshine and sons of bitches. Originally Posted by ekim008

Josey Whales

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DcB_O4C40q0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccqdEhytKOk

Don't count Missouri out...fuckers

While the Senate race is lost for the Republicans in Missouri, as long as Akin remains the candidate, I don't think the Presidential race is lost for Romney in Missouri by any means. The margin of victory for Romney in Missouri will be smaller. But I think we need to give it more time to properly gauge just how this will effect the final outcome. The next few Rasmussen polls of the Presidential race in Missouri should be very revealing.

any poll that shows Romulus ahead will be a boon for the wingers....

Nov 6th "Show Me".

any poll that shows Romulus ahead will be a boon for the wingers.... Originally Posted by ekim008

Mike the Independent has spoken.

I guess Rasmussen polls are like fox news.the only ones that will parrot the views of the right wing...

I guess Rasmussen polls are like fox news.the only ones that will parrot the views of the right wing... Originally Posted by ekim008

They are the most accurate public pollster in the business. Their final polls taken and released on the eve of both the 2004 and 2008 Presidential elections were accurate within 1 percentage point of the results of both elections.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ...s_track_record

The good thing about Akins is that this is as bad as it is going to get for the GOP. Akins may lose but Romney is well within the margin of error for the state. I expect that Obama will continue to drop as more and more people start to pay attention.

They are the most accurate public pollster in the business. Their final polls taken and released on the eve of both the 2004 and 2008 Presidential elections were accurate within 1 percentage point of the results of both elections.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ...s_track_record Originally Posted by NiceGuy53

the key is (the eve before) this time of the campaign there are the undecided and the ones who will change their minds.The debates will swing either way,so telling me how accurate they are now is bullshit.that goes for any poll....

the key is (the eve before) this time of the campaign there are the undecided and the ones who will change their minds.The debates will swing either way,so telling me how accurate they are now is bullshit.that goes for any poll.... Originally Posted by ekim008

You were attacking the Rasmussen poll, trying to tie it to Fox News. Guilt by association in your flawed logic. But yes, any poll taken only shows what the result would probably be if the election were held at that time. And yes you always have the undecided who change their minds as a result of events that happen before they election. That's why results from 1 pollster will vary from time to time. I was simply pointing out that Rasmussen is the most accurate pollster. Look at their track record. They always include a fair representation of all demographic groups. They don't oversample Democrats or Republicans for example. But you could not challenge my statement that Rasmussen is the most accurate pollster, so you simply deflected your point to now all polls are BS. That is not what you originally said.

Well fuck live with it other people have different views on which poll is the most accurate.wingers will believe anything that reflects their beliefs the same as liberals...