Provider posted alerts: Possible LE alerts, Robbery alerts, and LexusLover (since he wants this to be all about him)

I think that I pretty much made what my opinion is on this in this alert thread: ALL LADIES PLEASE READ. Cop posing as client to set ladies up... by Taylor Maide.

It seems that whenever a provider posts this kind of alert on a client or potential client, LexusLover takes it upon himself to stifle the thread with attacks, numerous posts trying to discredit the provider and their experience, turns the alert around on the lady where she feels like she has to defend themselves, and otherwise clog up the funnel that is supposed to provide a free flow of information in a section that is designed to keep this community safe.

I do not subscribe to the notion that most alerts, especially when it is about someone who has not been proven to be a member, should be only posted in the Infoshare or provider only areas. There are many ladies who only post on BP or may have just happened upon our community, and who does not yet have access to these areas whose safety and freedom could depend on alerts like this. Yet, when men post unsubstantiated alerts that could be a harm to a provider's safety, nothing is said about it AT ALL by him.

This is one of the responses that was given when I asked him why he feels the need to attack these kinds of posts all the time:

In today's environment it can get someone executed was they approach an incall location to meet a provider whose white knight buddies don't like cops and want a notch on their belt.....or up their "respect" from the provider. I realize it's "fashionable" to bash cops ... and particularly on this board .. Originally Posted by LexusLover

And I call bullshit. Everyone on this board spends a reasonable (and sometimes unreasonable in some's eyes) amount of time trying to avoid LE. No one in their right mind trying to hobby here, male or female, is going to try and lure a cop to an incall to 'pop out' or try to engage with LE in a combative manner in any way. When cops come to an incall to bust you, they are not alone.. there is a whole squad line of cops waiting right outside your door. The same thing as if they call you for an outcall. They are NEVER there alone. Even LexusLover knows that, and so does any other hooker who has ever been caught in a sting, seen one on TV, or heard about one from a friend of theirs. So this could not possibly be the reason why.

He has also insisted and said that the provider was doing it for "advertising" or attention. Most of the ladies who have written these threads are not regular posters on the open board, and who gains from a member posting an embarrassing situation that happened to them to warn the community about a potential threat? The members in the community that are the most at risk to these kinds of situations, that's who.

When these types of threads are so convoluted with hostile posts and remarks hell bent on discrediting the OP, it makes chicks who was doing a service to the community by sharing feel like it's not worth the grief to go out of their way and warn others when things like this happen.

The alert section is unlike any other section on this board, and in my opinion the most important. It's not a place for jokes and games, it is the section that is available to every member regardless of status that highlights potential dangers to everyone's livelihood.

True, some alerts are just paranoid and egregious in reality, but even those have their place. Not only do they remind us to stay on our P's and Q's and be well aware, but some people have also self alerted on themselves! The community knows who these people are and how to discern when a story doesn't add up or makes no logical sense.

Why is it that provider alerts are allowed to be extinguished and hostilely scrutinized to the point where it doesn't pay to warn by this one member?

I submit the following evidence to the scrutiny of my peers to further illustrate my point. I only went back as far as the beginning of 2014 but since there are 51 (

...."name it I'll do it" ...

............. nothing like fair and accurate advertising. Originally Posted by LexusLover

And the OPs alert "protects" others from what? Or perhaps from whom?

An unknown male in a truck talking on the phone in an incall parking lot .... or.... the officers in the marked units that arrived while the unknown male in a truck was talking on the phone in an incall parking lot?

Any thing else is pure speculation. Originally Posted by LexusLover

But it was this one not long ago in a guy's alert thread:

Not to mention being videotaped for a sufficient period of time to get a good image.

It is "discomforting" to have LE arrive at the precise time one is "supposed" to be in the parking lot to call for the room ....

,,,,, or some "spotter" in a vehicle across the street from the gate with a pile of cigarette butts on the black top next to the driver's side door .... watching the gate when one is asked .... "Are you at the gate yet?"

Ladies ... this isn't just about your security. Originally Posted by LexusLover

At the end of the day, it's not just anyone's safety. One domino can bring down the whole deck. I've seen girls get pinched, and to save their own ass are allowed to continue working as long as they throw others under the bus to get pinched also. This includes the guys that they see, to providers who give false references for LE.

Why oh why is the alert section allowed to be used this way by one member, and one member only? And my question to you directly LexusLover, is why do you do this?

There has been rumors speculating as to why, and I thinck that's another thing he takes issue with, is that some veteran and newbie providers assume from some of his posts that he is LE because he posts LE like things, often to the contrary of possible LE alerts. This problem is no one's but his; no one controls what he posts. I know for certain quite a few new girls have been spooked out by some of the things that he posts that point in that direction, but instead of modifying the behaviour so they don't thinck that, he goes into attack mode.

And as always there's this golden nugget. Since you opened the door on this for scrutiny, as did Kam (no offense darling) I have yet another question to ask.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kammye
Although i dont like to engage in the shenanigans on here. I have to say that Lexus Lover is NOT LE....I know this for sure.

"Information" = knowledge, facts. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Since you don't write reviews (which means nothing here in my eyes practically) how does she "know for sure" that you are not? Have you guys seen each other BCD to know, or did you meet over tea and crumpets on day and have the most delightful of conversations. I'm curious as hell. A simple answer 1.yes we have seen each other BCD, or 2. No we have not. will be sufficient enough for me.

I'll let everyone else make their decision on their own (which is how it is meant to be, not having one member shove it their opinion down your throat).

Quote

From having watched this board for a while and read way too many old threads, and please correct me if I'm wrong, LL became the devil's advocate to any provider calling anyone a safety risk since he was accused of being LE himself.

It's as if he wants to prove that we, providers, can potentially poison a member's reputation by "mistakenly" assessing a situation as dangerous.

I remember when he used to make sense most of the time, then he continued to reply to DM, non-stop. That's when he "jumped the shark". Now it's almost like he generalizes this feeling to all providers who find themselves in possible alert-worthy situations.

Just my .02

Quote

A throwdown!

Honestly, it seems like the OP has put a great deal of time & thought into this, so I think it at least merits some attention.

~

Quote

From having watched this board for a while and read way too many old threads, and please correct me if I'm wrong, LL became the devil's advocate to any provider calling anyone a safety risk since he was accused of being LE himself.

It's as if he wants to prove that we, providers, can potentially poison a member's reputation by "mistakenly" assessing a situation as dangerous.
Originally Posted by Camille Fox

If that were the case, he would state that in each thread... something along the lines of "it will hurt a member's reputation by "mistakenly" assessing a situation with someone as dangerous".. instead he jumps all in and attacks the provider and their credibility. Even if the guy that she's talking about has not been identified as a member here and he knows nothing about them. On many occasions, he has went out of his way to attack the provider without anyone having any information to access the situation i.e. not giving the provider a chance to respond to questions, not only for possible LE alerts but robbery alerts also.

I'm all about playing devil's advocate, it's one of my favorite things to do. But there's a difference between that and pinching off the flow of information even before it's gotten started.

I've been here a LONG, LONG time and I read almost every freaking thread in the alert section, always have, so I know his MO and his pattern when responding to only provider posted alerts. This distinction alone makes it worth the explanation if he intends to continue to do this unchecked.

HIS PROBLEM WITH DM I COULD CARE LESS ABOUT. Usually it's because she's the only one who either has the moxie or the time to even respond to him. If you pay careful attention to these threads, she doesn't even bring him up first, he starts in on her. But alas, that is not the issue here.

A throwdown!

Honestly, it seems like the OP has but a great deal of time & thought into this, so I think it at least merits some attention.

~ Originally Posted by Lexieinhouston

I put thought into everything I post. It's just that with some things I choose not to address, until I do.

This is not a throwdown, I warned him the other day this was coming, but he chooses to continue, so I have some questions to ask as I'm sure some others do also.

Quote

Ruttin' *Golf Clap* Miss.
There were some big words thrown in there makin' me ponder on the notions you are smarter than what you apply in plain speak.

Safety is a issue, both sides. I know where this is coming from, I've been reading it through out sub-forums, and the funny thing is the "guy" never posted a NC/NS in Co-Ed.

You may show your ass in AV, yet I show mine as well.

Miss, you're my kind of stupid. =]

Quote

She puts "thought" into acting like a snatch....interesting...

On a side note....Camille's tits are aaah-mazing...

Quote

Ruttin' *Golf Clap* Miss.
There were some big words thrown in there makin' me ponder on the notions you are smarter than what you apply in plain speak.

Safety is a issue, both sides. I know where this is coming from, I've been reading it through out sub-forums, and the funny thing is the "guy" never posted a NC/NS in Co-Ed.
Originally Posted by Mojo1972

I grew up in the hood, college educated. Best of both worlds. My mamma raised no fool. Consider it a trifecta.

She puts "thought" into acting like a snatch....interesting... Originally Posted by SNL9933

Were you too pussy to say 'pussy', pussy? You act like one naturally with no forethought put into it at all.

TG has been here for a week, and you're no him. Color me observant... and please take several seats.

To the general reading public:
Do not be mistaken, this thread is not to color how anyone percieves another, or about initiating "change" (which I know probably won't happen with this particular individual).

The purpose is for it to make certain people aware of certain behaviors, highlight those behaviors, and to BUMP with threads and posts when this behavior continues to occur in the future. Whether you agree with it or carry on with your business as usual without giving it another thought is irrelevant to me.

Quote

If you were so observant and college educated you would have known that "snatch" was used metaphorically.....Plus everyone knows you have a cock so pussy would be inappropriate.

Is that "pussy" enough for you? But keep going if you wish I have no problem bitch slapping you back to the hood...

Quote

In my opinion, while he does seem to post a great deal in alerts, it isn't always against providers, this is from one of the threads you posted:

Quote:
Originally Posted by GracePreston View Post
In Prostitution arrests, bonds are based on priors and on the residence of the offender. No permanent address in the reasonably local area results in a much higher bond. Flight risk, etc.
The cop doesn't set it.

There's an "alert" in this thread within an "alert," but the topic is forbidden.

I'm sure this is BP oriented, and no self-respecting Eccie Verified Provider would even think about doing so, but ...... Providers should ONLY BRING ESSENTIALS for the meeting to the meeting....and some things are not essentials and need to be left somewhere else while visiting with a hobbyist or ANYONE ELSE.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigtex View Post
Apparently, you two Idiot's have me confused with someone who went to high school in La Marque, Texas.
Originally Posted by i'va biggen
start a sentence with a capitol, .... Once a hillbilly always a hillbilly. You are a second grader.

~

Quote

This is about specific attacks to Provider posted alerts, not any of his other errant posts Lexie. If you don't realize that you obviously did not read the threads I posted, or do not quite understand the spirit of continually and unnecessarily attacking providers who posts alerts in the alert section. He has 17,000+ posts (we could do this all day). I understand you do not like me, and that is ok because I don't give a shit but please, don't convolute the thread with each one of his random posts which do not point to one side or the other of the arrow of the original topic.

Thank you.

Quote

Okay, I was going to try to give this whole theory a chance until:

A) You questioned Kammye for stating that she knew LL was not LE

&

B) You are comparing SNL to TG...how would you know, have you met either of these people, rofl?

I'll have to go back to last week I guess and find out just what it was that got you so pissed off at LL.

~

Quote

If that were the case, he would state that in each thread... something along the lines of "it will hurt a member's reputation by "mistakenly" assessing a situation with someone as dangerous".. instead he jumps all in and attacks the provider and their credibility. Even if the guy that she's talking about has not been identified as a member here and he knows nothing about them. On many occasions, he has went out of his way to attack the provider without anyone having any information to access the situation i.e. not giving the provider a chance to respond to questions, not only for possible LE alerts but robbery alerts also.

I'm all about playing devil's advocate, it's one of my favorite things to do. But there's a difference between that and pinching off the flow of information even before it's gotten started.

That I am not disagreeing with you... He is not being rational anymore. And true, member is not even the right word, he is just trying to show that we, providers, run our mouths with nothing to back it up with. Except that we can't really back up an alert, can we? That's rhe nature of this board, take for what is worth. But he goes on and on to prove we are imagining things.

I've been here a LONG, LONG time and I read almost every freaking thread in the alert section, always have, so I know his MO and his pattern when responding to only provider posted alerts. This distinction alone makes it worth the explanation if he intends to continue to do this unchecked.

HIS PROBLEM WITH DM I COULD CARE LESS ABOUT. Usually it's because she's the only one who either has the moxie or the time to even respond to him. If you pay careful attention to these threads, she doesn't even bring him up first, he starts in on her. But alas, that is not the issue here. (...) Originally Posted by Hottentot Venus

His problem with DM is not the topic, but it was what got this dismissing behavior started. Again, nor disagreeing with you, just pointing out that he is now on a mission to discredit providers because he was the alleged victim of an accusation.

Quote

Okay, I was going to try to give this whole theory a chance until:

A) A you questioned Kammye for stating that she knew LL was not LE

&

B) You are comparing SNL to TG...how would you know, have you met either of these people, rofl?

I'll have to go back to last week I guess and find out just what it was that got you so pissed off at LL.

~ Originally Posted by Lexieinhouston

That's why you should probably stfu.. you opinion is colored by other things that have nothing to do with the matter at hand. You are ignorant to the posts I am talking about, and you have a personal agenda. When I became fed up with this? You do not have to go back to last week to figure that out, Einstein. It was the very first thread that I posted, if it helps you any, here you go: http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1406889&highlight= . I won't be entertaining your ignorance, or deflecting from the original topic, anymore. :byefelicia:

Quote

I ALWAYS read alerts & his comments and I read your links; everyone is entitled to an opinion. I always take the word of the OP in an alert unless it is blatantly obvious that it was posted by someone jealous or an angry customer, just seeking revenge. I read over LL's comments, many of them have valid points and are just questioning things.

I am all for the safety and protection of other providers, even those who it may appear that I have been at odds with, and/or who insult me on a continuous basis.

I think it's up to every provider to read the alerts and consider whether or not they are credible, only YOU can protect yourself.

~

Quote

That's why you should stfu.. you opinion is colored by other things that have nothing to do with the matter at hand. When I became fed up with this? You do not have to go back to last week to figure that out, Einstein. It was the very first thread that I posted, if it helps you any here you go: . I won't be entertaining you ignorance or deflecting as I see it, anymore. :byefelicia: Originally Posted by Hottentot Venus

Yeah...good luck with this...you seem like such a joy to be around.

~

Quote