Caitlyn Jenner looking providers or is it just me?

Is it just me being paranoid or could some guys who've had a sex change now advertising here on eccie?
dearhunter's Avatar
Of course it is just you........ijs
pyramider's Avatar
Yep, the OP fixates on the transgender.
Guest123018-4's Avatar
You mean Bruce Jenner don't you?
I will bet any cop in here a doughnut that he still has a dick.
cabletex7's Avatar
Is it just me being paranoid . . . Originally Posted by hockeyman
Why?
If you can tell, walk away.
If you can't, well . . . enjoy.
Besides, if you're thinking about it, you've probably already fucked him/her?
Most are in dimly lit spas.
I guess all you could do is trust the reviews or wait for people who TOFTT.
strongbad's Avatar
Always think of the movie "Bachelor Party". "She pees standing up!"
Yep....

This deserves to be in the OTHER Fourm.....

Winkie to Winkie.....
Lol I'm afraid!
She (C.J.) still walks like she's got a pair, just sayin'. No grace in her stride.
She (C.J.) still walks like she's got a pair, just sayin'. No grace in her stride. Originally Posted by AlexisSoftTouch
Bruce/Caitlin/Whoever is still a dude. X & Y Choromosomes + Junk = Dude, no matter how much makeup and botox you wear.
OP, are you talking about pre-op or post-op TSes?

At least in the Austin forum, it's usually considered good protocol for pre-op TS providers to clearly identify themselves as TS in their usernames. Deception on that level isn't a profitable practice and could provoke a violent response in some cases.

What about post-op TSes, though? Should post-op TSes identify themselves as purely female providers despite being born with a Y chromosome?

Gentlemen, do you think it should be an unwritten protocol or a formal rule that TSes (pre or post-op) identify themselves as such so that you can distinguish them from providers who were born as XX females?

Ladies, if you found out a fellow provider wasn't born female but was a post-op TS, would you still consider her to be a sister in the community?