So a thread was started recently with a poll about Whispers. Similar in spirit to to incessant posts with polls that Whispers has started in the past aimed at bashing an individual or whole classes of hobbyists or providers. Whispers and cohorts found such threads to be great good fun, just as not-cohorts of Whispers found the "anti-Whispers" poll to be amusing.
However, while Whispers threads have typically been allowed to go on forever (mostly from his own sustained bumps), the Whispers poll thread abruptly was closed when Sixxbach strolled in and decided that it had no reason to keep using oxygen. Oh wait, that's right, Sixx has a history of covering Whispers' six...
BAD FORM. Given Whispers habit of bashing people who were banned, he shouldn't receive special treatment in that regard. Sauce for the goose should be sauce for the gander. The rules should be the same for everybody.
Originally Posted by Bobave
Hmmmmmmmm
I seem to recall that I closed a Toyz thread when he was recently banned. I thought since he couldn't respond or defend himself in that thread, there was no point in it being open.
You can look for the thread. I could have posted a link, but thought I would make you work for it.
I guess your rebuttal will be that I was covering Toyz's ass in that thread. First Whispers, and now Toyz? Yawn......
Sauce for the goose should be sauce for the gander? You're really dating yourself there. That gives me flashbacks of the Adam Sandler movie, "Waterboy" where he quotes some old backyard sayings. "Mama said..." Any other sayings you have for us there?
Nope, no special treatment given. .
Really.
(BTW, it's known as "selective moderation". Just be glad somebody finally grew a pair and found the ban button.)
Originally Posted by gfejunkie
Gotta love our ASPD, ECCIE reject moderator with his insight.
sixx