SCOTUS TO GOP -- Get the FUCK Outta Here with your PA Bullshit!

This might be the shortest SCOTUS opinion ever:

"The application for injunctive relief presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied"

That's real nice talk for GET THE FUCK OUTTA HERE WITH THIS ALREADY!!!!

Next SCOTUS opinion may be just that.

For the world's biggest winner, all this losing's gotta be bad for the brand.

All he's got left is ... his adoring minions.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH!



https://www.npr.org/2020/12/08/94423...ection-results


Supreme Court Rejects GOP Bid To Reverse Pennsylvania Election Results
December 8, 20204:57 PM ET
Barbara Sprunt 2017 square
BARBARA SPRUNT


The U.S. Supreme Court turned back an effort to reject Pennsylvania's election results.
Updated 5:15 p.m. ET

The Supreme Court Tuesday rejected an effort to overturn the results of the presidential election in Pennsylvania, signaling that the high court would not go along with President Trump's unprecedented efforts to win another term despite a decisive popular vote and Electoral College defeat.

The lawsuit was brought by Republican Rep. Mike Kelly, who argued a 2019 state law authorizing universal mail-in voting is unconstitutional and that all ballots cast by mail in the general election in Pennsylvania should be thrown out.

"The application for injunctive relief presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied," read the court's one-sentence order, which did not suggest any dissent among the court's nine justices.

Kelly, along with several others, filed the lawsuit on Nov. 21 and requested Pennsylvania either reject the over 2.5 million ballots that were cast by mail or allow state lawmakers to select presidential electors. Republicans control Pennsylvania's state legislature.

The state Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the lawsuit on Nov. 28, saying the GOP had waited too long to challenge the law.

Article continues after sponsor message

"Unsatisfied with the results of that wager, they would now flip over the table, scattering to the shadows the votes of millions of Pennsylvanians," Justice David Wecht wrote. "It is not our role to lend legitimacy to such transparent and untimely efforts to subvert the will of Pennsylvania voters."

Associate Justice Samuel Alito, who oversees emergency matters for the court coming from Pennsylvania, had previously given election administrators until Wednesday to file their response to Kelly's appeal.

But Alito moved up that deadline on Sunday, shifting it to Tuesday, the same day that marks the "safe harbor" deadline, which acts as a cutoff date by which states must settle any remaining election disputes and certify their results.

The lawyers representing Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf's administration have said Kelly's claims that Act 77, which enables voters to cast ballots by mail for any reason, is unconstitutional is baseless.

"After waiting over a year to challenge Act 77, and engaging in procedural gamesmanship along the way, they come to this Court with unclean hands and ask it to disenfranchise an entire state," they wrote. "They make that request without any acknowledgment of the staggering upheaval, turmoil, and acrimony it would unleash."

The law was passed in 2019 with widespread support from Pennsylvania Republicans, who control both chambers of the state's legislature.

Pennsylvania certified its election results on Nov. 24, with Biden winning by more than 80,000 votes. Pennsylvania has 20 electoral votes.

Legal blows for Trump campaign

The Supreme Court's refusal to overturn Pennsylvania's election results is a blow to President Trump, who has refused to concede and has spoken openly about his desire for the highest court in the land to step in and help his losing campaign.

At a political rally in Georgia on Saturday, Trump repeated his false and unfounded claims that the election was rigged and filled with "fraud, deception, and deceit."

"Hopefully, our legislatures and the United States Supreme Court will step forward and save our country," Trump said to cheers.

His remarks echoed a sentiment he expressed three days prior in what he said may be "the most important speech I've ever made."

"What a disaster this election was, a total catastrophe," he said. "But we're going to show it, and hopefully the courts, in particular the Supreme Court of the United States will see it and respectfully, hopefully, they will do what's right for our country."

Trump's campaign has filed numerous lawsuits in states where it did not win in the Nov. 3 election, legal moves that have not gotten very far in places like Arizona, Michigan, Nevada and Pennsylvania.

In many cases, judges have offered scathing remarks in their decisions to dismiss various lawsuits from the Trump campaign and its allies.

On Friday, the legal teams of Trump and his allies lost challenges in courts in six states within a matter of hours.

The Associated Press reported Monday that a federal judge threw out a lawsuit that challenged the presidential election results in Michigan, bluntly saying, 'This ship has sailed.'

But that hasn't stopped Trump allies from continuing to test the legal waters.

On Tuesday, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, claiming that changes in these states to election procedures due to the pandemic violated federal law. He is asking the Supreme Court to block the states from voting in the Electoral College.

Electoral College electors are scheduled to meet in states across the country on Dec. 14 to cast their votes. Biden is expected to receive 306 electoral votes, 36 more than the 270 he needed to become the next president.

The ballgame is OVER. Biden/Harris will keep the 20 electoral college votes from Penn. Trump and Pence are going home 1-20-21.

And tds will be with ya'll forever lolling

And tds will be with ya'll forever lolling Originally Posted by winn dixie

Sore LOSER!

OOps not a 5 star thread anymore. lolling

The ballgame is OVER. Biden/Harris will keep the 20 electoral college votes from Penn. Trump and Pence are going home 1-20-21. Originally Posted by adav8s28

Not so fast. Texas has been joined by Louisiana in a similar lawsuit. The SCOTUS will have a bigger problem dodging that one.

Do yous have any idea how stupids Trump and his clowns parade looks?

Yous should be embarrassed. Yet you loonies and twonies keep chirping!

At this rate, I will get my COVIDS injections before yous will.

Do yous have any idea how stupids Trump and his clowns parade looks?

Yous should be embarrassed. Yet you loonies and twonies keep chirping!

At this rate, I will get my COVIDS injections before yous will. Originally Posted by HoeHummer

Lookie here, HoesDummer and YR posting in the same thread! 5 star material!!!!

Not so fast. Texas has been joined by Louisiana in a similar lawsuit. The SCOTUS will have a bigger problem dodging that one. Originally Posted by bambino

Similar in what way? The SCOTUS agreed with the Penn Supreme Court. The Penn legislature passed a law in 2019, it's too late to complain about it now.

Trump is 1 for 40 in the courts right now. Bino, it's OVER. All you have to do is just ask CONSERVATIVE lawyer Kelly Conway's husband.

How ironic is that?

Stupid people need to send trump more money really fast lol. He has to move and has a lot of bills and attorneys to pay.

Not so fast. Texas has been joined by Louisiana in a similar lawsuit. The SCOTUS will have a bigger problem dodging that one. Originally Posted by bambino

Are you as dumb as you sound. Jeff Landry joined a losing lawsuit. So what. Trust me, he’s no legal genius. This isn’t a dispute between the states as envisioned by the founders. The suit will be dismissed as unceremoniously as the Penn suit was.

The scotus only denied injunctive relief, the case is still on their docket

The scotus only denied injunctive relief, the case is still on their docket Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

The effect is the same. If the injunction is denied then Biden will be President by the time the court even takes a look at the case.

Similar in what way? The SCOTUS agreed with the Penn Supreme Court. The Penn legislature passed a law in 2019, it's too late to complain about it now.

Trump is 1 for 40 in the courts right now. Bino, it's OVER. All you have to do is just ask CONSERVATIVE lawyer Kelly Conway's husband.

How ironic is that? Originally Posted by adav8s28

Pa didn’t follow state law in reference to mail in ballots. Texas is basically saying their voters are disenfranchise because other states didn’t follow state law. It’s obviously true in Pa. even Alito told Pa to separate all ballots received or post dated after 11/3. But if you read the fine print, Alito denied “emergency” hearing. He didn’t deny on merit. But essentially he was spineless. So, the OP is jerking himself a soda.

The effect is the same. If the injunction is denied then Biden will be President by the time the court even takes a look at the case. Originally Posted by 1blackman1

How do you know? Don’t bet your life on it. On second thought, do just that.