First off, I think this thread can be done in an informative way without the mindless trashing of opinions. I know, I know, there will be some who have to troll but they can be ignored.
That being said, why is this offer so bad?
http://www.eccie.net/providers.php?do=view&id=94735
Ashley Cummz works as an adult film model. In my chats with her she is fully aware of what is needed for testing in her films and requires the same of clients who wish to partake in this service.
IMO, this is safer than the ladies out there offering BBBJ, DATY, SS, etc. without requiring the same tests. There is still saliva and genital contact and while not nearly as risky as BBFS when you factor in current tests the risk is minimized significantly. I am in the camp where it is within my tolerated risk for me to receive BBBJ and give DATY but I am also of the mindset it is within my risk tolerance to engage in BBFS with someone who is PROVEN to be routinely tested. It doesn't happen often (hasn't within the last 11 years or so) that I engage in the act with a provider of some type and I don't know when I would in the future considering the pricing structure of the ladies who do legitimately offer this service.
While I know we talk about how important testing is the folks who routinely participate in BBFS without monthly testing and who do not require it of their clients should not be lumped in with providers like Ashley Cummz and other ladies who use adult industry standard testing AND always require it of their clients who wish to participate. I believe we are being intellectually dishonest if we are unwilling to acknowledge the difference. You don't have to agree, and if you don't please feel free to discuss.