Verified Provider in the Weekend Lineup using Stolen Pics. WTF???

Summerlovin,
Being new is no excuse to post pictures that don't belong to you.

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=509115

The pictures have been used multiple times on the internet...for example:

Google Search.jpeg

Google Search2.jpeg

Google Search3.jpeg

Google Search4.jpeg

No offense to anyone you say... This is not Backpage.

Oh this is going to be good

Some would say doctored pics are as bad as fake pics

I can't state my opinion on doctored pics...so much of that is just poor picture quality, camera phone or web cam shots...that would require stating an opinion based on pure assumption rather than fact as is shown in this case. Besides if we called out every provider who doctored her pics in some form or other...I think that would be 99.9% of them. We all just want to look our best. Stealing pics is just that STEALING. What if your sister or daughter was a model and someone stole her pics and posted them on an escort site and as a result her reputation was ruined? Hmmm.

You should state your opinion on doctored pics. Same difference. It's all bamboozling. The bottom line is, when the door opens, it's not what you expected. Therefore the deception is the same.

Who vouched for her? She posted her first ad 2 hours before her WW post. I guess that's possible, but don't think I've ever seen it done...

oh oh!
She's also listing illegal services (Body-to-Body and Mutual Touching).

Some would say doctored pics are as bad as fake pics Originally Posted by CarolinaGent

Drink of choice... on me.

So, using my fabulous powers of deduction and reading between the lines, I'm going to hazard a guess that Mercianna does not look quite like her pics.

Correct?

Duh!

It appears that the majority of men who see me say I am a attractive woman and my pics are accurate. When I was new, I did make the mistake of heavily editing pics and learned my lesson harshly by a merciless community. My pictures at this point are not doctored and any one who so wishes can come see for themselves. Until then, Don't make assumptions as to my appearance. I take care of myself, my age is accurate and I am not duping anyone. I value my reputation highly and work diligently at being my best. This thread isn't about me. It is about the fact that someone is a verified provider and flagrantly posting pictures that she has stolen off the internet. Doctoring pics is still doctoring your own pics. Not illegal. Using someone else's pics in the manner she is using them is.

Doctoring pics might not be illegal but it is deceiving the buyer......
Both that and stealing pics are false advertising. To say you no longer alter pics is laughable. Anyone can tell you do

Stealing pics might be worse, but I thought it was pretty damn funny that you were the one being so righteous about it

Who vouched for her? She posted her first ad 2 hours before her WW post. I guess that's possible, but don't think I've ever seen it done... Originally Posted by trynagetlaid

For the record: being vouched for is a) not a requirement for verification, and b) has no link to pics, per se. If some other member or provider says "I vouch for her, she's legit" that's a vouch. It's not that person verifying, "she's the person in the photos she advertises with."

To add on: if fake pics are posted, there is a clear ECCIE policy on that:

Carolina Gent, do you know me? Have you seen me in person? If not then kindly hush. Until you have met me your opinion does not count. Is it so unbelievable that I am actually attractive??? I have had more than my share of haters on eccie. But i've had many many more supporters who say the exact opposite than haters. The thing is, many well respected hobbyists recommend me highly, hobbyists with 10x the reviews you have plus some. So who is a liar? Also, please learn the difference between a low pixel web cam shot and doctoring. I have used web cam shots recently. They are not doctored. I do NOT FALSE ADVERTISE. I dare anyone anyplace and anytime to say that to my face. It is simply not true. Again, you don't know me Carolina Gent. Try reading my many, many positive reviews vs. the tiny minority of negative ones. BTW, of which, one traces back to an alert i posted first and was retaliation, Another one the guy took back everything he said negative in the first one in a second review. Another one was fake and I requested it be taken down and had proof that is fake. Another one was a threatened result of me not going back to give him a free session and him retaliating as promised. Again I have proof in pm's. Now I think that leaves a couple and guess what, not everybody is going to get along. And consider the fact that maybe these guys had an issue like BO, or were plain jerks and I state it clearly in my website that YMMV. If you treat me with less respect than I give to you then you may not have the experience you desire. Now, I am through discussing me...I refuse to defend myself over something that is so beneath me. My age is accurate, My looks are appropriate for my age, my photos do not misrepresent my physical appearance...and challenge you to say it to my face. Until then "YOU DON"T KNOW ME" Btw. I am a Penthouse Pet, 2005 "PENTHOUSE GIRLS OF CALIGULA" Film I don't think I made the cut by not being attractive. It may have been a few years ago, but it's true. So hate all you want. It will not effect my reputation, which the squabblings have not hurt at all, I am seeking a certain type of clientele and believe me they are intelligent enough to see through bs.

BTW, I have every right to feel righteous when I have been dogpiled mercilessly for something that many times I was not deserving of being defrauded and discredited by. When someone actually does post blatantly fake pics, yeah I take it personal. I have never posted a pic that was not me. I guaranty that I am the same person represented in my pics and my age is my correct age. I don't steal and I am impeccable with my word. I am a lady foremost .. so I am going to do the lady like thing here. And step away.

download2.jpg

download16.jpg

download14.jpg

Doctored??? LMAO

For the record: being vouched for is a) not a requirement for verification, and b) has no link to pics, per se. If some other member or provider says "I vouch for her, she's legit" that's a vouch. It's not that person verifying, "she's the person in the photos she advertises with."

To add on: if fake pics are posted, there is a clear ECCIE policy on that:
Originally Posted by Duke of G

What was supposed to come after the colon?

The reason I asked my question is that I was curious why her reference didn't go over the rules with her. If she wasn't referred then I got my answer.

Without a reference or a provider website, I assume she must have had previous reviews from another site.