This is pretty sad... 750??? LMAO!

In California, no less...

https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/to...ign=manualpost

Say bye bye , "blue wave".

In California, no less...

https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/to...ign=manualpost

Say bye bye , "blue wave". Originally Posted by gfejunkie

Any predictions on the November elections?

Any predictions on the November elections? Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

I think the Democrats will pick up some seats in the House, but not enough to gain a majority.

The Republicans will also retain the Senate, possibly pick up a seat or two.

The Republicans need to keep former President Obama and Nancy Peloci front and center. The first to remind voters how bad things were, ad the second to remind voters how stupid Democrats really are.

I think the Democrats will pick up some seats in the House, but not enough to gain a majority.

The Republicans will also retain the Senate, possibly pick up a seat or two.

The Republicans need to keep former President Obama and Nancy Peloci front and center. The first to remind voters how bad things were, ad the second to remind voters how stupid Democrats really are. Originally Posted by Jackie S

Thanks.

The only way I am different is that I think Democrats will win the House back. Again, it all depends on which party is able to motivate their supporters the most.

And I still don't know what a "Blue Wave" or "Red Wave" is. Seems like everyone has a different interpretation.

Pretty stark comparison. OBama has lost his juice. Nobody wants to hear his lectures anymore. Hillary would have been a disaster.

Pretty stark comparison. OBama has lost his juice. Nobody wants to hear his lectures anymore. Hillary would have been a disaster. Originally Posted by bambino

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7qrx3xrCEs
Yeah when I saw him resurface...all I could think!!

Odumboo , " Never had juice" He's very old news and Billary well enough said.

Any predictions on the November elections? Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Based on what?

a. Polls?
b. LameStream media pundits?
c. Wishful thinking?
d. All of the above?

10-20-2016, 08:03 AM #21
SpeedRacerXXX


This election is OVER. Republicans should start focusing on 2020. Unless a bomb hits between now and November 8th there is no way Trump can overcome the lead that Clinton has in the polls. For those of you who are still not believing the polls . . . we'll see in a handful of days how accurate they are.

I used to believe Carter "took the cake" with respect to attempting to marginalize and/or ridicule "the next guy," but he's been put to shame by Obaminable, who's bested HillariousNoMore!

Now the "deplorables" are "insane" according to Obaminable.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

More fear and loathing from the whackadoodle RWW blogs.

You may really hate Obama, but he sure knows how to get Democrats out to the polls.

If you think Trump’s candidates will carry California, then I’ve got some beachfront property in Arizona for you!

Say good night Donnie.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

More fear and loathing from the whackadoodle RWW blogs.

You may really hate Obama, but he sure knows how to get Democrats out to the polls.

If you think Trump’s candidates will carry California, then I’ve got some beachfront property in Arizona for you!

Say good night Donnie. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Do ya mean Trump's candidates will be throwing wine bottles at TVs on election night JUST LIKE shrilLIARy did ? ! :r oflmao:

...Obama, but he sure knows how to get Democrats out to the polls..... Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

... now if he can just get them to vote for Socialists instead of Trump's candidates!

Pretty stark comparison. OBama has lost his juice. Nobody wants to hear his lectures anymore. Hillary would have been a disaster. Originally Posted by bambino

Lol... here's my favorite soundbite from the 2016 campaign:

"So why aren't I 50 points ahead, you might ask?"

(Pssst, hildebeest... maybe because you screech too much? And you forgot to blame Putin!)

Of course what the article neglected to mention is that the Obama rally was an invitation only affair. But then based on the bias of the publisher, that is not exactly a surprise.

Based on what?

a. Polls?
b. LameStream media pundits?
c. Wishful thinking?
d. All of the above?
Originally Posted by LexusLover

Based on whatever criteria a person believes is pertinent.

Possibly using information that is available that breaks down the races by district. Lots of information/opinions available.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com...orecast/house/

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-a8500316.html

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-a8501821.html

https://www.politico.com/election-re...d-predictions/