No uncircumcised men....safety first!

Yes the title line ......
No uncircumcised men....safety first!

Saw this in a providers showcase...
somebody please help me out and explain this to me....
Yes I fully understand the personal preference aspect of this and would not be offended at all....
but insinuating that I am less safe than a circumcised guy..
punish me for a decision my mother made 40 some years ago... where nowadays even medical providers often times don't cover the procedure.
aww whatever

A lot of people think that men who are uncircumcised aren't as "clean" as those who are cut. When in reality if you aren't clean uncut you wouldn't be clean cut and vise versa. Just know that she doesn't know much about sexual health and be glad you won't be seeing her.

I've had a lot of fun with uncut men, most are more sensitive and that can be a lot of fun, lol.

Some believe they can get aids or something lol.

Some believe they can get aids or something lol. Originally Posted by NalgaSuckie

I noticed most hookers education level is the same as those from a third world country.

They go by what they hear and nothing else.

The grade school theory I remember was that after uncut fucks the head is covered over with the pussy juice skin. And its touching your pee hole. You're screwed dude you got the shit.

Thats how I remember it. Mythbusters never took it on.

this gives good insight.

http://healthland.time.com/2013/04/1...s-risk-of-hiv/

it's not about "punishing you" for what your Mom did 40 years ago.. it is about safety. that's like me saying to a lady, "don't punish me by making me wear a condom, just because the last guy gave you an STD".

if I was a Provider, I would have the same policy.

If you are using a condom what difference does it make? The study by the CDC says it prevents men from catching it from women (vaginal intercourse only) but not men from catching it from men

https://www.webmd.com/parenting/baby...alth-reasons#1

"The guidelines do point out that circumcision has only been proven to prevent HIV and sexually transmitted diseases in men during vaginal sex. The procedure has not been proven to reduce the risk of infection through oral or anal sex, or to reduce the risk of HIV transmission to female partners."

In either case a thorough cleansing with a good soap (Betadine) should remove any germs from your penis....now if only the provider would do the same, lol

Gotyour6 obviously that would have something to do with the price of the escorts you see. I don't intend to insult them, but at eighty or fifty dollars an hour you are probably not going to get an educated person. In case you didn't realize.

Yes the title line ......
No uncircumcised men....safety first!

Saw this in a providers showcase...
somebody please help me out and explain this to me....
Yes I fully understand the personal preference aspect of this and would not be offended at all....
but insinuating that I am less safe than a circumcised guy..
punish me for a decision my mother made 40 some years ago... where nowadays even medical providers often times don't cover the procedure.
aww whatever Originally Posted by uncut78xxx

Why haven't you had it done?

This is interesting because circumcision is becoming less and less common, with many American parents choosing not to have it done. The US is the only industrialized nation where circumcision is/was a routine procedure. In most places it's only done for cultural and/or religious reasons.

Reading all the different studies, circumcision does make a slight difference in the spread of *some* STDs, but it's very very small. If a provider is truly concerned or wants more info then looking up info on the rate of STDs in Europe and African countries might be more useful than just reading pro/con reports in US sources that are a bit biased and use misleading statistics out of context.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/10/u...cumcision.html

Yes the title line ......
No uncircumcised men....safety first!

Saw this in a providers showcase...
somebody please help me out and explain this to me....
Yes I fully understand the personal preference aspect of this and would not be offended at all....
but insinuating that I am less safe than a circumcised guy..
punish me for a decision my mother made 40 some years ago... where nowadays even medical providers often times don't cover the procedure.
aww whatever Originally Posted by uncut78xxx

Post link to showcase

Here is one girl who will not see uncircumcised men:

https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php...ircumcised+men

Maybe, she just hates uncut cock. Whatever. Some people like the look of having a giant scar on their dick.

I can say for one have an issue only because of the simple fact that it's rare for a uncircumcised to be clean. We all know what we're about to do. If your not circumsized and have it all smelly I'm not going down on you and it shouldnt be my responsibility to clean you. It just grosses me out even more.