Another conspiracy theory proven to be true.

The Georgia prosecution of Trump was being directed by the White House.

Lies the left claims!!

Oopsies. You picked shitty allies, Communists. Nathan Wade just testified under oath that he held several meetings with the White House personnel. Of course he can't remember ANYTHING or WHO was at these meetings... but he was billing the people of Georgia for his time to meet with White House staff.

That means that yes, the communists were in fact prosecuting their political rival.

I'm really happy that communists are so stupid. It gives us normies a chance to defeat them.

Communists?

Please explain how...

"several meetings" = "Georgia prosecution of Trump was being directed by the White House"

.

Please explain how...

"several meetings" = "Georgia prosecution of Trump was being directed by the White House"

. Originally Posted by rooster

Asking a conspiracy theorist to explain. That’s funny.

This is just another example of Jim Jordan in his role as chairman of the House Judiciary Committee using his position to investigate supposed enemies of Trump and throwing meat to the crazies in the party. I expect this investigation to come to naught like most of the others.

Hey, it may not stink as much as Trump's calls to Rusty Bowers and Brad Raffensperger, but it still stinks. White House lawyers shouldn't involve themselves with a politically-charged county prosecution of an opponent.

Wade sounds incredibly evasive in the transcript.

Hey, it may not stink as much as Trump's calls to Rusty Bowers and Brad Raffensperger, but it still stinks. White House lawyers shouldn't involve themselves with a politically-charged county prosecution of an opponent.

Wade sounds incredibly evasive in the transcript. Originally Posted by Tiny

"Sounds?" How is that possible?

You really buy into all this bullshit, eh, Tiny?

Enough so to try and normalize Trump's behavior in Georgia.

That may not stink as much as what others may have bought into, but it may.

SMFH

Hey, it may not stink as much as Trump's calls to Rusty Bowers and Brad Raffensperger, but it still stinks. White House lawyers shouldn't involve themselves with a politically-charged county prosecution of an opponent.

Wade sounds incredibly evasive in the transcript. Originally Posted by Tiny

It depends on the context and nature of the meetings and who they were involved with. As far as I can tell the meetings were instigated by Wade during his investigation and prosecution of his RICO case. There are lots of legitimate reasons to involve the white house counsel specifically because the case involves the executive branch under the previous administration.

As far as his memory is concerned, As a lawyer he knows that it’s easier not to remember than it is to have something taken out of context or to have different recollections on the record that might be innocuous but could still be twisted into something damaging. Considering the partisan nature of Jim Jordan and the investigating committee I would have a faulty memory as well.

Communists? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Yeah. OP is using a unique interpretation of "Normies" also....

.