IRS Lawyer Admitted Lois Lerner’s ‘Lost’ Emails Were Backed Up

I B Hankering's Avatar
Gov’t Watchdog Says IRS Lawyer Admitted Lois Lerner’s ‘Lost’ Emails Were Backed Up


After maintaining for quite some time that Lois Lerner’s emails are completely, definitely gone (maybe), it turns out that there’s now a different story.

According to Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton:
"Department of Justice attorneys for the Internal Revenue Service told Judicial Watch on Friday that Lois Lerner’s emails, indeed all government computer records, are backed up by the federal government in case of a government-wide catastrophe."


http://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphi...-emails-exist/













Our government backs up TYRANNY... Who knew?
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Hasn't this already been posted, like, MONTHS ago?

of course it has. No wonder IBIdiot is just getting the news.
I B Hankering's Avatar
Hasn't this already been posted, like, MONTHS ago?

of course it has. No wonder IBIdiot is just getting the news
. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Forbes put the story on the internet less than two hours ago, you Hitler-worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM. So much for your stupid-ass **keeping up with the news**, you Hitler-worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.

Plus, it's the first time someone representing the IRS has publicly admitted that senior IRS personnel have been lying their collective asses off for months about "irretrievably missing e-mails", you Hitler-worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM!
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Where's the lie, IBIdiot? Was there or was there not a post about Lois Lerner's emails being backed up days ago?

Let me refresh your stupid fucking memory, Mr. Cronkite...

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?...=lois+lerner//

Of course, if you deny this thread existed then you're a bigger fool than humanly possible. Where's the LIE, you stupid fucking idiot? Where's the NEWS? There is none, just your delusional sense of self importance. Why did you start a new thread instead of simply appending the existing one?

The only lie here is your refusal to explain why you doctored your own post to remove Glenn Beck from your history.

It didn't work.
I B Hankering's Avatar
Where's the lie? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
From the source for the thread you are citing, you Hitler-worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM:

"Kane told Oversight staffers last week that the backup tapes that held two years of lost Lerner emails may actually still exist."
From the Forbes story released today, you Hitler-worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM:

So do they or don’t they?

After maintaining for quite some time that Lois Lerner’s emails are completely, definitely gone (maybe), it turns out that there’s now a different story.

According to Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton:
"Department of Justice attorneys for the Internal Revenue Service told Judicial Watch on Friday that Lois Lerner’s emails, indeed all government computer records, are backed up by the federal government in case of a government-wide catastrophe."

Fitton went on to say that those same attorneys have indicated that finding the emails would be too difficult...
So as a third grader can plainly see, Forbes is saying it's a new story, you Hitler-worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM; hence, you are a liar when you say it is not, you Hitler-worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.

Plus, it's the first time someone representing the IRS has publicly admitted that senior IRS personnel have definitely been lying their collective asses off for months about "irretrievably missing e-mails", you Hitler-worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.
Yssup Rider's Avatar
That's no lie. It's the thread as quoted. it's the OLD thread about this very subject, which you have chosen to SPAM the board with.

Notice, I didn't call you a cum-gobbling fucktard... Imwouldnt want to upset your mother/sister/brother.

Also, why did you doctor your own thread on the Glenn Beck link? Why won't you answer that?

Bop. Bam. Boom. DOWN GOES IBIDIOT. DOWN GOES IBIDIOT. DOWN GOES IBIDIOT!
Jewish Lawyer's Avatar
Forbes has a new story -excellent example of why we need a free press to fight government tyranny.
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Fraud. Fraud. Fraud.
I B Hankering's Avatar
That's no lie. It's the thread as quoted. it's the OLD thread about this very subject, which you have chosen to SPAM the board with.

Notice, I didn't call you a cum-gobbling fucktard... Imwouldnt want to upset your mother/sister/brother.

Also, why did you doctor your own thread on the Glenn Beck link? Why won't you answer that?

Bop. Bam. Boom. DOWN GOES IBIDIOT. DOWN GOES IBIDIOT. DOWN GOES IBIDIOT!
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Forbes and several other news agencies are making the claim that this is "new information"; hence, a "new story", you Hitler-worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM. The POV of Forbes and several other news agencies trumps your lying POV every day of the week, you Hitler-worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM; hence, that makes you a liar when they claim it's a new story and you stupidly claim it isn't, you Hitler-worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.
"Spam Writer" watches the MSLSD. There is no way he could have access to reality...
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
Old story or new (by the way, this is new information), the emails should be turned over. Then the President should be rightly impeached and convicted. Then he should be tried by a jury of his peers, then spend many years making little rocks out of big rocks. Ijs.
Guest123018-4's Avatar
Libtards hate it when the curtain is pulled back to reveal the great and powerful OZ.

This event should never be allowed to die. When we have a government, regardless of the party affiliation, that has such a blatant disregard for the rights of the people we should be marching in the streets. Every single person that participated in the abuse by the government should be discovered and punished, not just as an example, but as a severe deterrent to those that would do the same in the future.

This is a front page issue that should stay there until it is resolved. It is unfortunate that it will take a different administration to make that happen. Eric Holder is a criminal.
Jewish Lawyer's Avatar
Fraud. Fraud. Fraud. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
So as a third grader can plainly see, Forbes is saying it's a new story, you Hitler-worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM; hence, you are a liar when you say it is not, you Hitler-worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.

Plus, it's the first time someone representing the IRS has publicly admitted that senior IRS personnel have definitely been lying their collective asses off for months about "irretrievably missing e-mails", you Hitler-worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.
Jewish Lawyer's Avatar
Old story or new (by the way, this is new information), the emails should be turned over. Then the President should be rightly impeached and convicted. Then he should be tried by a jury of his peers, then spend many years making little rocks out of big rocks. Ijs. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
I'm not quite sure that the President should be impeached for the email scandal unless it can be shown he knowingly participated in it. The underlings involved may have thought they were doing exactly what he wanted, and they probably were, but I think constitutional protections extend to a defendant in every case. The President may be a partisan hack, and I don't care for him, but Lois Lerner lying about emails, and an orchestrated coverup of her malfeasance, is not sufficient to imprison him absent an overt act in support of the scheme.