Encounter: Baby? More Like

Date: 12-07-23
Name: Baby
Phone: 469-875-6657
Email Address: None
URL / Website: https://www.blossom-k.com/
City: Dallas
State: Texas
Address: After Screening
Activities: Shower, CG, BBBJ, 69
Hair Length and Color: Shorter
Age: 36-40
Smoking Status: Non-Smoker
Ethnic Background: Asian
Physical Description: Short. Was wearing one of those maid headdress things, which was cute. I saw people say she was young and someone specifically said she looked like a famous streamer named Kson, but I completely disagree. Had a tattoo on her back. Not a big deal at the end of the day, but I miss when reviews would actually point these things out for guys like me who aren't big on that sort of thing. She will wear glasses at your request, but they're fake and just for fashion which isn't an issue for me but just saying for those who might've been interested. Nice MMs, though
Recommendation: No

Thanks for your honest review. Reminds me of a dream I had, in that dream I thought...

honestly why one of the things why I have slowed down on my hobby (I don't review every encounter). The so-called "early 20s" are unmistakably someone in their late 30s-40s. I think only 5 of these were actually in their 20s, easily my fav and best sessions. It's a huge turn-off when you go in with these expectations, only to see someone a decade or two older than what most people say.

One in particular was so off, her skin was super stretchy, and her voice was deep and raspy, surprisingly no smell of cigarettes like another famous one that I haven't seen in a while.

If these reviews/promoters were more honest, I wouldn't have an issue with it. If she's 30 but performs well, tell me. If she's 40 but will have you wanting more, then say it. But don't flat out lie saying they're 20.

Thanks for an honest review. I feel like the TGTBT rule still applies for the Studio girls. We know we're getting a real girl and have a good idea of services unlike things like LC which are a crap shoot. But barely any of the girls are close to the age listed or look close to the pics. It sounds like Cristal and Eve are the only two that resemble their pics and the ages listed.

Didn't see baby, but her room mate told me that baby look young, maybe she lied.

The so-called "early 20s" are unmistakably someone in their late 30s-40s. I think only 5 of these were actually in their 20s, easily my fav and best sessions. It's a huge turn-off when you go in with these expectations, only to see someone a decade or two older than what most people say. Originally Posted by youthinkyouknowme

But barely any of the girls are close to the age listed or look close to the pics. Originally Posted by sfrusty26

Didn't see baby, but her room mate told me that baby look young, maybe she lied. Originally Posted by yanjunyy

Originally Posted by ErikHua621

Thanks for your honest review. Reminds me of a dream I had, in that dream I thought...

honestly why one of the things why I have slowed down on my hobby (I don't review every encounter). The so-called "early 20s" are unmistakably someone in their late 30s-40s. I think only 5 of these were actually in their 20s, easily my fav and best sessions. It's a huge turn-off when you go in with these expectations, only to see someone a decade or two older than what most people say.

One in particular was so off, her skin was super stretchy, and her voice was deep and raspy, surprisingly no smell of cigarettes like another famous one that I haven't seen in a while.

If these reviews/promoters were more honest, I wouldn't have an issue with it. If she's 30 but performs well, tell me. If she's 40 but will have you wanting more, then say it. But don't flat out lie saying they're 20. Originally Posted by youthinkyouknowme

I don’t know why guys always get so tight up about being fooled. If you have deal tight enough women esp in this hobby you know the ages a re all fudged. In the civilian world pics follow the 10/10 rule in this hobby it’s more like the 15/10 rule . If they say early 20s you’d be a fool to take them at face value.